thank you your quick reply
>
> HI Timo:
> I am working on enabling our accelerometer in Nokia's sensor
> framework. Here are some issues i met:
>
> 1. hard coding of adaptor name. accelerometer chain and accelerometer hard
> codes the adaptor name to
> "accelerometer". If all adaptors ha
Hi,
I tried by downdling the libhal rpm packages, while i tried installing its
showing
PolicyKit not explicitly disabled no PolicyKit found..
I have installed Policy kit still its showing same problem..
Please if any one have any idea help me
regards
Lakshmi
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:40 AM, L
HI Timo:
I am working on enabling our accelerometer in Nokia's sensor framework.
Here are some issues i met:
1. hard coding of adaptor name. accelerometer chain and accelerometer hard
codes the adaptor name to
"accelerometer". If all adaptors have same name, sensord failed to distinguis
Am Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2010 10:27:15 schrieb Zhang, Austin:
> > So I guess that they are the cross compiler and toolchain for the N900
> > device,
> For armv7 ISA
We've 2 tree's - armv5 and armv7.
> > and they should be installed on a host linux PC.Is my understanding
> > correct? And How cou
You may also try smart:
http://piscoespecial.blogspot.com/2010/03/chroot-with-smart.html
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Bintian Wang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems Intel just releases this Meego public repo:
> http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo
>
> Bintian
>
> On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 08:26 +0100, prasanna g
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ware, Ryan R wrote:
> We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
> non-ARM hardware. ;-)
>
Non ARM is much more easy because we will be dealing with TPM chip and TXT.
Does atom based boards come with TPM. If yes I can start contributi
We also need to take into account that this solution needs to work on
non-ARM hardware. ;-)
Ryan
On 6/10/10 9:56 AM, "Shaz" wrote:
> Secondly, I do agree that EVM is not very suitable for trustzone but what is
> more suitable? In my opinion a single file protected by secure/trusted boot
> and
here's a rather crappy video of me booting meego on the 900, launching
chrome, and shutting down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=701yd1IX7iw
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Robert Rambo wrote:
> Then you were running some pretty slow OSes before this one :)
>
> not at all :-) MeeGo
On 10 Jun 2010, at 16:34, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Robert Rambo wrote:
are you saying that MeeGo will be slow on non SSSE3 computers??
that's not
the case at all.. of all the OS I've installed on my EeePC 900
(Celeron),
MeeGo is by far the fastest running
Then you were running some pretty slow OSes before this one :)
not at all :-) MeeGo on the 900 with a Celeron boots in about 9
seconds, Chrome launches in about 3 seconds... navigation in the menus are
instantaneous... previously I've ran NBR, 9.10 and recently NBE 10.04..
I've also ra
On 6/10/10 12:04 PM, "Shaz" wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Janne Karhunen
wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>>
Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
>
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Janne Karhunen
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
> >> against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
> >> framework.
> >
> > Please re-read t
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:17:25PM +0100, Glen Gray wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2010, at 16:34, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Robert Rambo wrote:
> >>are you saying that MeeGo will be slow on non SSSE3 computers??
> >>that's not
> >>the case at all.. of all the OS I've insta
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:39 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Do you have in mind a particular use case and risks you wish to protect
>> against? I can take that example to explain how it can be done by our
>> framework.
>
> Please re-read the use-case again ... you have overly simplified it.
> Openness betwee
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me try to answer some questions.
>
> > How can we fit this in TCG MPWG and OMTP TR0/1 specs?
>
> I prefer to speak about the needed properties/features, rather than about
> particular specs unless there is a requirement to sat
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:13:52AM -0600, Doug Gibbs wrote:
> I have been asked about the minimum size Flash and RAM to use for a MeeGo
> based platform we are working on.
>
> Yes, I know how difficult this question is. It all depends on the number of
> features needed. The basics are:
> Minimal k
I have been asked about the minimum size Flash and RAM to use for a MeeGo
based platform we are working on.
Yes, I know how difficult this question is. It all depends on the number of
features needed. The basics are:
Minimal kernel with networking, 802.11 with security, and USB host (MeeGo is
the
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
> >> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
> >> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
> >> not
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:18:10AM -0400, Robert Rambo wrote:
> are you saying that MeeGo will be slow on non SSSE3 computers?? that's not
> the case at all.. of all the OS I've installed on my EeePC
are you saying that MeeGo will be slow on non SSSE3 computers?? that's not
the case at all.. of all the OS I've installed on my EeePC 900 (Celeron),
MeeGo is by far the fastest running..
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:30:13PM +0100, John Lawman wr
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
>> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
>> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
>> not granted for.
>
> This is where dbus comes in ... right?
Well we d
>
> As learned by people maintaining kernel packages, it works better this
> way over the long term (and even the short term). You have an easy
> separation of upstream and added patches and you can remove/add patches
> at any place in the stream. It also makes it much easier to forward
> port to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:30:13PM +0100, John Lawman wrote:
> Will including SSSE3 support as part of the minimum requirement is going to
> be a limiting factor in the adoption of MeeGo?
If you don't, it will be very slow. Try it and see...
good luck,
greg k-h
_
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:08:38AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all I want to thank you very much for giving us this great
> mobile platform. MeeGo is just amazing!
>
> I know that the MeeGo kernel process has been a big debate before (I
> have read the archives).
Will including SSSE3 support as part of the minimum requirement is going to
be a limiting factor in the adoption of MeeGo?
There are many other x86 computers out there that can run Linux-based
systems (including 3D acceleration) quite comfortably.
So, sure Atom benefits from SSSE3. Does this mean
Hello,
First of all I want to thank you very much for giving us this great
mobile platform. MeeGo is just amazing!
I know that the MeeGo kernel process has been a big debate before (I
have read the archives).
I cloned the kernel-source tree and saw that it only contains patches
against different
This also makes it more clear what's MeeGo and what`s the HW integration layer.
But I can guess there will be some issues with OBS structure and project
dependencies(circular).
Maybe someone with more OBS insight can confirm or reject this.
/R
> -Original Message-
> From: meego-dev-boun
>
> Task can hold tokens named 'Calendar' and 'Phonebook' for
> accessing these interfaces. Or, we can drop this even
> lower by saying Calendar::function and everything else is
> not granted for.
>
>
This is where dbus comes in ... right? And now I am loosing what LSM and
rbac does here :)
>
> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> >> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
>> >> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
>> >> The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
>> >> multiple task labels and the fact t
On 6/10/2010 2:29 AM, chenmeng wrote:
hello all:
I am interesting about power managerment of meego. Will meego use ospm
which was used by moblin? Why is ospm not included in meego releases of
0.9& 1.0?
Can anyone is working on power managerment of meego give me some
infomation,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
> >> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
> >> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
> >> The 'real' difference between smack and this is t
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a couple of
> days ago.
>
> As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
Duh, that was just Pekka going solo and nothing more serious
than that..
--
// Ja
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 14:52, Glen Gray wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> What's the policy on supporting MeeGo releases ? Are we looking at an 18
> month lifespan or is it simply, stick to the latest ?
Maintenance policy is explained at
http://wiki.meego.com/MeeGo_Release_Creation#Maintenance_phase
--
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>> Effective bits in access control are quite simple and similar to
>> SMACK. Check the linux-security-module discussion for starters.
>> The 'real' difference between smack and this is that we support
>> multiple task labels and the fact that we don't
Carsten kindly pointed me to http://wiki.meego.com/MeeGo_Release_Creation
On 10 Jun 2010, at 12:52, Glen Gray wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> What's the policy on supporting MeeGo releases ? Are we looking at an 18
> month lifespan or is it simply, stick to the latest ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> --
> G
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Shaz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> >> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> >> and codebase. More details about that:
>> >>
>> >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Janne Karhunen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
> >> and codebase. More details about that:
> >>
> >> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
> >>
> >> Nokia
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> MeeGo security architecture will be base on Maemo6 (Harmattan) model
>> and codebase. More details about that:
>>
>> http://fosdem.org/2010/schedule/events/maemo
>>
>> Nokia is open sourcing the security componets starting now.
>
> "now"? Cool,
Hi,
Glen Gray wrote:
> What's the policy on supporting MeeGo releases ? Are we looking at an 18
> month lifespan or is it simply, stick to the latest ?
My opinion (which doesn't count much on this issue) is that support is
up to distributors. Nokia will be providing support for MeeGo based
Nokia
Hey Guys,
What's the policy on supporting MeeGo releases ? Are we looking at an 18 month
lifespan or is it simply, stick to the latest ?
Thanks in advance,
--
Glen Gray
___
MeeGo-dev mailing list
MeeGo-dev@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo
Em Quinta-feira 10 Junho 2010, às 12:59:13, Tomas Frydrych escreveu:
> > As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
>
> I wonder, why was it expected ?
Well, it was expected to me. A few months ago, I was contacted about some
questions on modifying D-Bus, which looked like a se
Hi,
On 09/06/10 22:38, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> FYI, a number of patches were posted to the D-Bus mailing list a
> couple of days ago.
>
> As expected, the mailing list's reaction was "use PolKit"...
I wonder, why was it expected ?
Looking through the dbus archive, the mailing list reaction to
Hi,
I want to raise discussion about the repositories, especially the
structure of Core repository. If I have understood correctly the core
repository contains the main parts of the MeeGo which create the base of
MeeGo OS for all of the devices/architectures.
In case of Nokia N900 there are alrea
2010/6/9 Carsten Munk :
> Seems like we forgot to announce this one, but:
>
> We're going to be having a N900 hardware
> adaptation team sync meeting in #meego-meeting on irc.freenode.net
> tomorrow Thursday 9 June 9.00 EEST (8.00 CEST, 6.00 UTC, wednesday 23.00 PDT).
>
> Feel free to join and part
hello all:
I am interesting about power managerment of meego. Will meego use ospm
which was used by moblin? Why is ospm not included in meego releases of
0.9 & 1.0?
Can anyone is working on power managerment of meego give me some
infomation, URL etc.?
thanks
chenmeng
__
Dear meego-dev ,
I have a question about how to establish an IRC connection via IM(Empathy).
In my experience , I use xchat before.
After I connect to IRC network , it will popup a window to input a specific
channel.
But base on my meego testing , the IRC can not pop up the enter channel
windo
Hello,
I would like to contribute to MeeGo project as Software developer
I have a previous experience in Software development about 4 years (it
includes development for embedded system and application development
for desktops).
I use C/C++/GtK/Qt. I have development exposure on Inte
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Sylvia Liu wrote:
> Sorry, I cannot use git protocol. Only http is supported because of
> the proxy rules.
> So, is that possible to make the http way working?
Git over http works perfectly on Gitorious.
I just tried:
git clone http://git.gitorious.org/nokia
Hi,
It seems Intel just releases this Meego public repo:
http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo
Bintian
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 08:26 +0100, prasanna grande wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for info
> While i am trying to install libhal its showing "No package
> libhal-devel available"
> please let me know wheth
> So I guess that they are the cross compiler and toolchain for the N900
> device,
For armv7 ISA
> and they should be installed on a host linux PC.Is my understanding correct?
> And How could I install them on my PC, is there any guide about it ?
You'd better install them in one meego environme
Hi Zheng,
I normally use cross compiler from:
http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/subscripti...@template=lite
Here are the steps to compile kernel using this cross compiler:
1. Extract it (lets say /opt/arm-2010q1)
2. export PATH=$PATH:/opt/arm-2010q1/bin
3. export ARCH=arm; export C
Sorry, I cannot use git protocol. Only http is supported because of
the proxy rules.
So, is that possible to make the http way working?
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Ameya Palande wrote:
> Hi Sylvia,
>
> Instead of using "http" can you try "git" protocol.
> git clone git://gitorious.or
Hi,
I am doing some research about the MeGoo kernel build system for N900
device, and I have notice that in the repo
http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/releases/1.0/core/repos/ia32/packages/i586/ I
can find some rpm packages following:
[ ] cross-armv7l-gcc-4.4.2-2.3.i586.rpm10-
Hi Sylvia,
Instead of using "http" can you try "git" protocol.
git clone git://gitorious.org/nokia-n900-kernel/nokia-n900-kernel.git
I just tried it at my local machine, and didn't see any error :)
Cheers,
Ameya.
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 09:24 +0200, ext Sylvia Liu wrote:
> Hi Ameya,
>
> While tr
Hi,
Thanks for info
While i am trying to install libhal its showing "No package libhal-devel
available"
please let me know whether to add any url to repo's
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Bintian Wang wrote:
> You can use command "yum install xxx-devel" as root, make sure you have
> correct co
Hi Ameya,
While try to git the repository from the site you provided, I
encountered the following errors.
Can you help to check it out?
BTW: I can clone other repositories on gitorious. So I think that
might be an error from the repo. side.
$git clone http://git.gitorious.org/nokia-n900-kernel/n
56 matches
Mail list logo
