On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 04:44:57PM +0800, Chen Dai wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about browser engine.
>
> Why MeeGo use two different browser engines, Webkit/Chromium for
> netbook, Gecko/Fennec for handset?
>
> Why not use one browser engine for all device?
Please read the archives,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:49:59AM +0800, Alex Wu wrote:
> 2010/11/10 Greg KH
>
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:59:40AM +0800, Alex Wu wrote:
> > > Sorry, it's plymouth-lite. But if it could add a little bit support on
> > > animiation rather than just
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:59:40AM +0800, Alex Wu wrote:
> Sorry, it's plymouth-lite. But if it could add a little bit support on
> animiation rather than just static picture, it would be better.
That would slow things down, you shouldn't see the static picture very
long at all before X takes over
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:20:31AM -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010, Greg KH wrote:
>
> >>We are working with customer for the startup & shutdown process.
> >>
> >>We need to hide cursor and all messages then use plymou
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:15:24PM +0800, BlueGene wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are working with customer for the startup & shutdown process.
>
> We need to hide cursor and all messages then use plymouth to display splash.
Meego does not use plymouth as the kernel should boot fast enough to not
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:44:43PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > btw for the meego-kernel I really want subscriber only. I want people
> > who post patches to get not just the review comments
> > on their code, but also on everyone elses code so that they won't
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:51:22PM -0600, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>
> There's a fresh draft up, finally:
>
> http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance#Specification
>
>
> Please comment on this one.
Section 5, MeeGo Netbook Specification:
You really aren't specifing anything becides the requir
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:51:22PM -0600, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>
> There's a fresh draft up, finally:
>
> http://wiki.meego.com/Quality/Compliance#Specification
>
>
> Please comment on this one.
Line 188:
A compliant system shall use Linux kernel version 2.6.35 or
later.
Wh
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:21:15AM +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010 ?? 00:43 +0300, Felipe Contreras a ??crit :
>
> > What I'm mostly worried is *why* people felt the need to create
> > spin-offs. Maybe we should be thinking about using NetworkManager
> > instead of Conn
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:49:39PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> Hello Jos,
>
> Thank you for your email and the proposal to use "DarkRider" instead of
> "Smeegol".
>
>DarkRider, an openSUSE release based on the netbook user interface that
> came from the Meego(TM)* project.
>* Meego is
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:02:35AM -0700, Quim Gil wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 17:40 +0200, ext Greg KH wrote:
> > Of course, a "real" cease-and-desist order would have to be filed for
> > any of this to be able to be properly discussed, which I think, is the
> >
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 08:24:47AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:16:50PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:59, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > >>
> > >
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:16:50PM +0100, Andrew Flegg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:59, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, LF thinks the name Smeegol, while funny and inventive, might not be the
&
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > It is not in the benefit of MeeGo project to use "Smeegol". We therefore
> > can not approve such usage of MeeGo mark in "Smeegol". We understand that
> > you've already announced it and we will be happy to work with you to come
>
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 03:05:40PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Please accept my apologies for late reply. This is regarding your request to
> use:
>
>Smeegol, an openSUSE release based on the netbook user interface that
>came from the Meego(TM)* project.
>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 04:23:30PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Just because connman is a small component and has a fairly self-contained API
> and predictable behaviour, it's not an exception to the rule. You must use
> the
> components, all of them, in the same versions.
Ah, so the same wi
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:45:45PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday 23. September 2010 21.05.56 Greg KH wrote:
> > I don't see ConnMan providing an API or ABI, do you? If so, where is it
> > documented?
>
> Yes, I do. It has a D-Bus API.
So, if _thats_ the
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:59:14PM -0700, Ryan Ware wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 01:29 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > I don't know what it is these days, as there's only been one release,
> > and that's the netbook 1.0 one.
> >
> >
> Not to be pedantic about
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:03:00PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 09/23/10 13:48, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:31:43PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> >>On 09/23/10 13:04, David Greaves wrote:
> >>>On 23/09/10 20:05, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>>On T
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 01:31:43PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 09/23/10 13:04, David Greaves wrote:
> >On 23/09/10 20:05, Greg KH wrote:
> >>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:20:27PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dave Neary wro
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:04:07PM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> On 23/09/10 20:05, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:20:27PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> >>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> >>>Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:20:27PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> > > You can apply patches against
> > > components in the MeeGo Core stack and you can add new components but
> > > not to replace ex
Large snippage, as I think the main problem here is a lot of confusion:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:52:13AM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> > > Compliance is work in progress - please participate in the compliance
> > > discussion thread to help shape the compliance efforts and please refer
> > to
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:05:05PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em Quinta-feira 23 Setembro 2010, às 17:25:53, Jared K. Smith escreveu:
> > As I read it, the latest "compliance" draft documentation says nothing
> > about connman, but if that's really going to be a solid requirement
> > for compl
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:06:04AM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> Hi Jared,
>
> I am confirming that we were contacted by RH and you were cc-ed on the
> emails. We agreed on the wording of your spin (which is inline with the
> trademark policy and guidelines [1]), and approval was given conditiona
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:58:19AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> As part of the discussion we had internally I believe RH legal spoke
> to the LF and got some sort of response that it would be fine if we
> complied with the requirements and kept getting referred to the
> website and we complied wi
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:29:43PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:16:40PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> >> On 09/20/10 12:42, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> >> >Firstly sorry if this is the wrong
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:20:48PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 5:10 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:57:51PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2010 4:47 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On M
>>>>>> Great, as ther
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:56:00PM -0700, Christian Daudt wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:45:52PM -0700, Christian Daudt wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 20, 201
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:55:57PM -0700, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> >> >> > My next question is that of artwork. Looking at the link provided I
> >> >> > don't see anything about artwork usage. From what I can tell, there
> >> >> > is
> >> >> > the icon-theme package which refers to the Compliance
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:57:51PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 9/20/2010 4:47 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On M
> >>>Great, as there is no final compliance program, all things are free to
> >>>use, right?
> >>Depending on what is being used, some require
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:23:27PM -0700, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> >
> > What "name"? "Smeegol"? The LF can't say anything about that, sorry,
> > but it can have an influence on how the wording of the statement.
>
> It is the wording more than anything else.
Then say that :)
> The link provides
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:50:20PM -0700, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> comments inline highlighted in blue.
"blue" doesn't work in text-only email clients, sorry :)
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:00 -0700, Greg
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:44:32PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> *
> *
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> > > Please visit:
> > >
> > http://www.linuxfoundati
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:45:52PM -0700, Christian Daudt wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> >> Please visit:
> >> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/linux-foundation-trade
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:02:38PM -0500, Ibrahim Haddad wrote:
> Please visit:
> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/linux-foundation-trademark-usage-guidelines(which
> also includes correct and incorrect ways of using the mark)
>
> The link above is also reachable from: http://meego.com/about/t
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:53:43PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Otherwise, I think the name "Smeego, based on the spittle that came from
> the MeeGo(tm) release" looks like a nice phrase to use.
s/Smeego/Smeegol/
___
MeeGo-dev mailin
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:38:46PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 09/20/10 13:25, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> I hate to say it, but for all cases where legal issues are involved,
> >>> please consult your lawyer.
> >Hey, that's totally not fair here.
> >
>
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:16:40PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 09/20/10 12:42, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> >Firstly sorry if this is the wrong list to send this question to, please
> >advise on the best one if it isn't here.
> >
> >I have been spending my time trying to get the MeeGo UX into reasonable
>
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> MeeGo currently boots in about 8 seconds on a netbook. We're not
> starting things we don't need to start.
> We start all the things we know we need anyway as early as possible
> so we don't need to wait on it later.
openSUSE is b
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 08:05:56AM -0700, Michael Leibowitz wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 07:53 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > upstart has license/contribution issues which are not pretty
>
> License is GPLv2, according to Launchpad. The Canonical Contributor
> Agreement requires copyright a
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 05:23:20PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> 2010/9/17 Greg KH :
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Pertti Kellom??ki wrote:
> >> Are there any plans re upstart in MeeGo? I'm asking because we have
> >> test scripts that use in
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:19:05PM +0300, Pertti Kellomäki wrote:
> Are there any plans re upstart in MeeGo? I'm asking because we have
> test scripts that use initctl to control daemons, so the scripts
> need to be modified if there is no upstart.
I would hope it would be on the roadmap for futur
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 07:19:24PM +0200, mikhail.zabal...@nokia.com wrote:
> What, does MeeGo still maintain the kernel sources as a repository not
> cloned off the actual kernel tree?
Yes.
> Do we like having any kernel builder or contributor jump through hoops
> all the time, or is there a goo
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:59:34PM +0200, Carsten Munk wrote:
> 2010/8/24 Greg KH :
> > And is this upstream? If not, why not?
>
> Is Moorestown SGX upstream? (Both ARM and IA have skeletons in the closet).
I don't think so, and yes, I am well aware of this skeleton, we dan
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:51:32AM -0700, James wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 08:55 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:19:44PM -0700, James wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/19/2010 05:10 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:28:39PM
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:30:18PM +0200, Carsten Munk wrote:
> This is part 5 of 5 of a patchset implementing the following in MeeGo kernel:
>
> - Add OMAP DSS2 patches for supporting upgraded SGX driver:
>linux-2.6.35-OMAP-DSS2-in_use-flag-for-dss_cache.patch
>linux-2.6.35-OMAP-DSS2-Keep
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:29:53PM +0200, Carsten Munk wrote:
> This is part 4 of 5 of a patchset implementing the following in MeeGo kernel:
>
> - Add OMAP DSS2 patches for supporting upgraded SGX driver:
>linux-2.6.35-OMAP-DSS2-in_use-flag-for-dss_cache.patch
>linux-2.6.35-OMAP-DSS2-Keep
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:19:44PM -0700, James wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 05:10 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:28:39PM -0700, James wrote:
>>
> ...
>>> The above is enabled via CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_CY8CTMG110_MULTIPLE_INPUT
>>> with the default
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:50:49PM -0700, James wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 05:09 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:21:18PM -0700, James wrote:
>>
>>> This series fixes two bugs (jitter and calibration), provides some
>>> general cleanups, and adds mu
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 07:37:41PM -0700, James wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 05:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:24:59PM -0700, James wrote:
>>
>>> This patch modifies cy8ctmg110_touch_pos to map all of the data provided
>>> from the hardware into
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:24:59PM -0700, James wrote:
> This patch modifies cy8ctmg110_touch_pos to map all of the data provided
> from the hardware into the cy8ctmg110 data structure for use within the
> driver. In doing so, the patch also cleans up some endian conversions to
> use be16_to_cpup(
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:28:39PM -0700, James wrote:
> This patch optionally provides a mode of multitouch that works with
> Qt 4.7's approach of taking input from multiple /dev/input/event
> interfaces. It does so by creating one input device for each supported
> contact point (2 in this case)
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:21:18PM -0700, James wrote:
> This series fixes two bugs (jitter and calibration), provides some
> general cleanups, and adds multi-touch capabilities to for the
> cy8ctmg110 touch screen driver.
>
> James Ketrenos (4):
> cy8ctmg110: Removed X and Y scaling factor for
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 03:27:23PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
> > > +#define MODULE_NAME "pch_phub"
> >
> > This isn't needed, right? The kernel provides this to you in the build
> > service automatically.
>
> I can't understand above enough.
> Is t
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:10:29PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> We have modified our phub driver with sysfs I/F.
What is "I/F"?
The driver is a lot better, thanks for doing this. It's also simpler,
right?
> Please check below.
>
> Best Regards, Ohtake(OKISEMI).
>
> ---
> Packe
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:12:45PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:29:25PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do they all have to be ioctls? What exactly are they doing?
> > > > > > I think using ioctl is common for this
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:58:49PM +0100, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Excerpts from Greg KH's message of Fri Aug 13 22:14:19 +0100 2010:
> > And still I fail to see why you are trying to compare MeeGo to Ubuntu.
> > If you like Ubuntu, it's there for you to use, no one is forcing you to
> > use MeeGo,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:27:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>
> >>This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
> >>on a upstrea
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>The booting process has been analyzed by many peoples the last
> >>couple of years. I have not read all of there conclusions, but from
> >>what I remember, reducing the I/O activity (in number and in
> >>latency) was a far
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:20:47PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >>Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >>>On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> >>&g
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:53:09PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>
> This was the Meego decision, without the community, to not be based
> on a upstream distribution to solve this kind of issue. Several of
> us have warned at that time that this will be a big wast of time.
> The argument w
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:32:21PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Greg KH a écrit :
> >On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
> >>On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
> [snap]
> >>I guess people want the official OBS to have the
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 06:01:36PM +0200, Brendan Le Foll wrote:
> On 13 August 2010 17:53, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> >> Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >> >On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wro
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:37:04PM +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
> Foster, Dawn M a écrit :
> >On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:42 AM, David Greaves wrote:
> >This is the way open source projects are supposed to work. The
> >people who start the project pick a manageable set of hardware to
> >get us s
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:13:24AM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@suse.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:15 PM
> > To: Masayuki Ohtake
> > Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; LKML; Wang, Qi; Wang, Yong Y;
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:29:25PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > Do they all have to be ioctls? What exactly are they doing?
> I think using ioctl is common for this patch.
"Common" is not ok, right?
> Do you think that using ioctl is NOT appropriate for this patch?
Yes.
> Le
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:34:33PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> Hi Qi-san
>
> I have found Macro 'TRUE' and 'FALSE' are used as setting value in the
> driver; still,
> can't I use TRUE/FALSE macro ?
> If not, How should we implement ?
Use the 'bool' type, and 'true' and/or 'false' keywords in
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:35:59PM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> As you pointed out, PCH_PHUB patch should be implemented with sysfs interface.
Yes.
> PCH_PHUB driver need access 15,361 Byte option ROM, but on i386, the
> buffer will be 4096B. With this kind of way, we need several buffe
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:15:15PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> CAN driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> T
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:39:13PM +0800, Lv, Zhiyuan wrote:
> Ian is on travel and I am sending this patch on behalf of him.
>
> The patch is to add a kernel device driver of virtio-gl, which is used for
> data communication between QEMU emulator host and client OS running in it.
> This virtual
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:32:04PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> IEEE1588 driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:02:26PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> SPI driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> T
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:59:13PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> GPIO driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
>
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:39:41AM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 08/09/10 10:28, Carsten Munk wrote:
> >2010/8/9 Auke Kok:
> >>On 08/08/10 11:22, Anup Bansod wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I have been studying the architecture for meego for quite a few days now
> >>>and also the bugs/deficiencies, i have found so
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:40:58AM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> > +#include "i2c-pch.h"
>
> Why do you need a .h file for this driver?
> Almost all the device drivers from OKI have a separate header file.
That is not a reason to have a .h file, please don't have one if you
don't absolutely need it,
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:33:24PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtak wrote:
> I2C driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus.
> T
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:25:26PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg KH"
> To: "Development for the MeeGo Project (discussion list)"
>
> Cc: "Khor, Andrew Chih Howe"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:47
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:23:07AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 10:17 AM, Greg KH wro
> > And why doesn't it use the "standard"
> >userspace interfaces for controlling the system power states?
>
> there is no standard way to control C states
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:28:43PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
> As Arjan responded, some of the changes for this daemon is in progress
> and will be re-submitted.
re-submitted where?
> Until then this is the package that interacts with OSPM driver (the
> platform power management kernel driver
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:24:47AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 9:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:54:24AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>On 8/3/2010 8:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>>the userspace you're looking at is an his
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:54:24AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 8:48 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>the userspace you're looking at is an historic artifact, not
> >>representing the current state of code.
> >It looks like userspace applications use this l
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:21:14AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 8:03 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> > I was browsing the Handset packages when I stumbled upon the ospm
> >package. This -appears- to my skim read to fill a rather similar space
> >to the upower package
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:27:04AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 8:16 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>ar space
> >>> to the upower package.
> >One other question about the ospm package, where is the kernel code that
> >this library is talking to? I can
Linus without reworking, as I point out below.
So can you drop it from your tree for now?
thanks,
greg k-h
- Forwarded message from Greg KH -
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:57:09 -0700
From: Greg KH
To: "Development for the MeeGo Project (discussion list)"
Cc: "Khor, Andrew Chi
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 04:03:54PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was browsing the Handset packages when I stumbled upon the ospm
> package. This -appears- to my skim read to fill a rather similar space
> to the upower package.
One other question about the ospm package, where
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:03:56PM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> This patch has been accepted by the upstream.
> http://git.zen-kernel.org/?p=kernel/mmotm.git;a=commit;h=79a0ac666c36d75c98039251cbe0775ea54d9c3e
Ah, that's just the -mm tree, everything ends up there :)
Please fix this an
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:48:48PM +0900, Masayuki Ohtake wrote:
> Hi Greg KH,
>
> I have added my answer below.
> Please find ''.
>
> Thanks, Ohtake
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Greg KH"
> To: "Development for the MeeGo
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:34:32AM +0800, Wang, Qi wrote:
> Packet hub driver of Topcliff PCH
>
> Topcliff PCH is the platform controller hub that is going to be used in
> Intel's upcoming general embedded platform. All IO peripherals in
> Topcliff PCH are actually devices sitting on AMBA bus. Pac
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:07:32PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> On 08/02/10 11:09, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:48:47AM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> >>However, I haven't had enough time yet thus far, and some of the
> >>methods used by systemd don't
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:48:47AM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> However, I haven't had enough time yet thus far, and some of the
> methods used by systemd don't look that compatible with smartphones
> just yet.
In what way are the methods not compatible with Linux on a phone?
curious,
greg k-h
_
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 09:14:43AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 7/29/2010 1:35 AM, Andrew Wafaa wrote:
> >Aloha all,
> >
> >I'm having some issues getting the network panel to display properly
> >using NetworkManager as the backend via network-manager-netbook. I
> >appreciate MeeGo uses con
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 03:32:10PM +0300, Tim Gorree wrote:
> So far, what would you say are the main difference between MeeGo and Android?
Lots.
> What does it do better? And what does it do worse? Benefits vs. shortcomings?
Try both out and see for yourself.
good luck,
greg k-h
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:32:33AM +0800, wrote:
> Hi all:
> i have a hardware sample of slate(Moorestown) now, the site :
> http://www.umpcportal.com/2010/06/meego-tablets-land-wistron-w1-moorestown-meego-and-no-demo-until-tomorrow/.
> now i don't know which image be used and how to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 05:35:36PM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote:
> Here is another example: CONFIG_USB_HSO
What's wrong with this module, are you not going to support any random
USB device being plugged into your system?
thanks,
greg k-h
___
MeeGo-dev ma
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 10:23:45PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:35:39PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> So one would expect that such distro-agnostic spec file can be use in
> >> Me
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:35:39PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, AFAIK build.meego.com is closed, so many people probably don't
> know what it means to maintain a package in MeeGo. Let's shine some
> light on that.
>
> Say you have a package that has a spec file that is distro-agno
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:18:00AM -0600, Clark, Joel wrote:
> Folks need to talk to the graphics driver business group to review the
> license and get access to the driver. That's why I put the web site up
> there. I don't work in that group and can't get the driver for you.
As someone who has b
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:49:29AM +0200, Mike Massonnet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just figured /dev/stdin is missing (as well as stdout and stderr). I
> guess it won't be re-added unless it's a bug, however I had like to
> know why. I have a small program that reads from /dev/stdin for user
> input and
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 03:57:36PM +0300, Toni Nikkanen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 05:54:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > also want to know how USB webcam fits into it.
> > It is different, it uses the v4l2 layer, not gstreamer.
>
> Can't it be used via gst
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
