On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 22:55 +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
but at the end of the day,
end users won't even notice either of the two.
Actually users do notice: GConf/dconf settings are instant apply with
notifications across the desktop, QSettings not so much.
Ross
--
Intel Open Source
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 11:33:00, Ross Burton escreveu:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 22:55 +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
but at the end of the day,
end users won't even notice either of the two.
Actually users do notice: GConf/dconf settings are instant apply with
notifications
On 25/01/11 12:12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 11:33:00, Ross Burton escreveu:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 22:55 +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
but at the end of the day,
end users won't even notice either of the two.
Actually users do notice: GConf/dconf
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 12:17:05, Robin Burchell escreveu:
Though, at present, QSettings provides no API for change notifications
(something which has irritated me, and obviously others, many times -
going by the number of GConf uses and wrappers that have proliferated
around
On 25/01/11 13:21, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 12:17:05, Robin Burchell escreveu:
Though, at present, QSettings provides no API for change notifications
(something which has irritated me, and obviously others, many times -
going by the number of GConf uses
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 12:17:05, Robin Burchell escreveu:
Though, at present, QSettings provides no API for change notifications
(something which has irritated me, and obviously others, many times -
going by the number of GConf uses and wrappers that have proliferated
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 15:27:02, Urho Konttori escreveu:
Don't we have mobility publish and subscribe (or qvaluespace) for the
exact purpose outlined here as the change notification?
PS is very good at providing dynamic value changes across the entire system.
But as it is
ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 15:27:02, Urho Konttori escreveu:
Don't we have mobility publish and subscribe (or qvaluespace) for the
exact purpose outlined here as the change notification?
PS is very good at providing dynamic value changes
Em terça-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2011, às 16:15:43, Urho Konttori escreveu:
There are different backends to PS. Shared memory is the most volatile
and the one people often mistake to be the only backend.
Take a peek at:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/qtmobility-1.2/publ-subs.html
Gconf is even now
ext Rob Taylor rob.tay...@codethink.co.uk writes:
I have to say, I rather like the idea of using the Qt Pub/Sub API to
expose configuration settings (as is done now for gconf).
Yes, that's the natural API candidate.
What are the drawbacks with that approach?
It is not part of QtCore, and
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Marius Vollmer
marius.voll...@nokia.com wrote:
What about moving Qt Mob PS into QtCore?
QSettings is using it btw? Or has plumbing to allow usage thereof? (I
now recalled I talked to you about this a long while back)
-Sivan
Hi,
Andre Klapper wrote:
Users (=apps) would rather convert to using GSettings in Glib/gio.
Most users (=apps) would probably like to continue using the same API,
and only have the backing store change.
Then there's the second type of users (=people) who want to
transparently have the same
On Wednesday 19 January 2011 07:38:06 Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com
wrote:
I also recall a couple of emails about it from the beginning of the
project. What has Ubuntu made already that could be served to a
transitioning or
On 1/24/2011 10:29 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
I agree with Aaron that just embracing what Ubuntu does and create Ubuntu-
specific versions of Qt applications is a bad idea. If dconf is the way to go,
it needs to be properly integrated into Qt instead of coming as Ubuntu-
specific bindings. Then
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use the
proper abstraction API.
... which is, presumably, GSettings?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Email: dne...@maemo.org
Jabber: bo...@jabber.org
___
MeeGo-dev mailing
Em segunda-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2011, às 16:38:46, Dave Neary escreveu:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use the
proper abstraction API.
... which is, presumably, GSettings?
Or a revamped QSettings if we can make it.
Besides, the
On 1/24/2011 11:38 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use the
proper abstraction API.
... which is, presumably, GSettings?
since MeeGo API's are Qt based... it'll be some Qt API.
-Original Message-
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On
Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:49 AM
To: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Dconf
Em segunda-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2011, às 16:38:46, Dave Neary escreveu
Em segunda-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2011, às 09:35:28, Foster, Margie escreveu:
On MeeGo, I have no clue where it's supposed to be configured, given the
different implementations between netbook and the others.
Of course, Qt doesn't integrate with any of those. The only way to
configuyre the
ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org writes:
Em segunda-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2011, às 16:38:46, Dave Neary escreveu:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use the
proper abstraction API.
... which is, presumably, GSettings?
Or a revamped
On Tuesday, 25 de January de 2011 08:05:46 Marius Vollmer wrote:
ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org writes:
Em segunda-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2011, às 16:38:46, Dave Neary escreveu:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Heck, app writers wouldn't even notice the difference if you use
the
proper
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 15:06 +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
it needs a plan and then execution to convert existing users of gconf...
and their keys.
there are still many keys that are very generic and used by many folks
does dconf has a compatibility mode that maps gconf legacy paths to
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; Ryan Lortie
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Dconf
On 1/19/2011 2:49 PM, Rob Taylor wrote:
On 19 Jan 2011, at 00:28, Arjan van de Venar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 6:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
Now that the internet is telling me Ubuntu is warming up to Qt
Now that the internet is telling me Ubuntu is warming up to Qt and making Qt
wrappers for dconf... Perhaps this is a bandwagon meego should jump to? It's
not like we have anything better lined up in that area.
--
Sent from my Nokia N900
___
MeeGo-dev
On 1/19/2011 6:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
Now that the internet is telling me Ubuntu is warming up to Qt and
making Qt wrappers for dconf... Perhaps this is a bandwagon meego
should jump to? It's not like we have anything better lined up in that
area.
--
this has come up several
I also recall a couple of emails about it from the beginning of the
project. What has Ubuntu made already that could be served to a
transitioning or testing phase ?
-Sivan
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Arjan van de Ven
ar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 6:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote:
I also recall a couple of emails about it from the beginning of the
project. What has Ubuntu made already that could be served to a
transitioning or testing phase ?
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/568
Quote:
On 19 Jan 2011, at 00:28, Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 6:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
Now that the internet is telling me Ubuntu is warming up to Qt and making Qt
wrappers for dconf... Perhaps this is a bandwagon meego should jump to? It's
not like we have
On 1/19/2011 2:49 PM, Rob Taylor wrote:
On 19 Jan 2011, at 00:28, Arjan van de Venar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 1/19/2011 6:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
Now that the internet is telling me Ubuntu is warming up to Qt and making Qt
wrappers for dconf... Perhaps this is a bandwagon meego
29 matches
Mail list logo
