Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-05-02 Thread tero.kojo
-Original Message- From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Jeremiah Foster Sent: 30 April, 2010 15:25 To: meego-dev List Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps Look at it from the position of the vendor

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-30 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Dave Neary wrote: Because we may still need some distinction between app store downloads, I'm still inclined to name these Add ons or Extras. Maybe think of the name from the end-user perspective? Those people will see different stores and then this community

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-30 Thread tero.kojo
-Original Message- From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] On Behalf Of ext Jeremiah Foster Sent: 30 April, 2010 12:08 To: meego-dev List Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Dave Neary wrote

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-30 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Apr 30, 2010, at 12:06 PM, tero.k...@nokia.com tero.k...@nokia.com wrote: On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Dave Neary wrote: Because we may still need some distinction between app store downloads, I'm still inclined to name these Add ons or Extras. Maybe think of the name from the

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-29 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote: But we also need the process and mechanisms to ensure that the community apps are of good quality. The apps are one of the calling cards of the community. Also some process to ensure that the people building on the community OBS do not hog the system or try to

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-28 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 00:27, Spencer, Bob bob.spen...@intel.com wrote: My ears were burning and now I know why.  I've read through the thread and picked here to jump in for a few comments below. Great to see you here, Bob. Here's some more stuff to throw into the discussion.  We've been

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-28 Thread David Greaves
Clint Christopher Cañada wrote: +1 from me. It looks like the best term so far. On 4/28/2010 1:15 PM, Quim Gil wrote: ext Graham Cobb wrote: why don't we call this the Community Repositories Team. +1 Quim Gil wrote: understands it. ;) Surrounds is indeed poetic but We

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-28 Thread Spencer, Bob
What's in a name? Shaver, Michael R wrote: On 4/28/10 1:39 AM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 00:27, Spencer, Bob bob.spen...@intel.com wrote: My ears were burning and now I know why.  I've read through the thread and picked here to jump in for a few comments

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, ext David Greaves wrote: quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, I think we have a mismatch between the name and the content. How to call this? Names carried from maemo.org or moblin.org would be Downloads, Extras or Garage. Apps, Addons, Catalog are also used in similar contexts. None of them

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread David Greaves
Quim Gil wrote: Hi, ext David Greaves wrote: quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, I think we have a mismatch between the name and the content. How to call this? Names carried from maemo.org or moblin.org would be Downloads, Extras or Garage. Apps, Addons, Catalog are also used in similar

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread Glen Gray
On 27 Apr 2010, at 17:04, David Greaves wrote: Quim Gil wrote: Hi, ext David Greaves wrote: quim@nokia.com wrote: Hi, I think we have a mismatch between the name and the content. How to call this? Names carried from maemo.org or moblin.org would be Downloads, Extras or Garage.

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread Shaver, Michael R
Let me insist on Downloads, then. :) well, sure. But it feels to me that that would be like calling the Community Working Group Forums. And we both know that there's a lot more to it than that :) Obviously we (well, the CWG probably) will need to find some branding for the services

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread Graham Cobb
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 17:59:16 Shaver, Michael R wrote: I think coming up with the overall name will inform how we name the various processes and components that make up this. An example would be if the overall name to end users was called Extras, then for the developer uploading their

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-27 Thread Quim Gil
ext Graham Cobb wrote: why don't we call this the Community Repositories Team. +1 Being picky someone still could say that since all MeeGo is community all repos are community repos. Still, most people do understand that one thing are the repos of software officially supported making a MeeGo

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-20 Thread Jeremiah Foster
On Apr 20, 2010, at 12:24 AM, David Greaves wrote: So is this area managed by the core project? How can it be? MeeGo core is a distro, not an app-store or sourceforge. It has no policies or processes for handling non-affiliated applications. There isn't even community access to the core

Re: [MeeGo-dev] Repository Working Group - next steps

2010-04-20 Thread Marko Vertainen
2010/4/20 Jeremiah Foster jeremiah.fos...@pelagicore.com: If there is no access to the build system, MeeGo is effectively closed. There is open bug for this: http://bugzilla.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615 -- Marko ___ MeeGo-dev mailing list