I am starting Memcache in my Linux machine the following way , the second
ip below is the replication port , configured with the help of repcached
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.1.101 -p 11211 -m 64 -x 10.1.2.102 -v (Server
1)*
and
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.2.102 -p 11211 -m 64
First of all I want to thank all of you for your replys and I want to
apologize, that I didn't replied earlier, but part of last week I was ill.
However, I may have not put enough emphasis on my real problem. Some users
losing their sessions is one thing that isn't that pretty, but not the end
Hi ,
My Application is Using Memcache installed on two machines 10.1.1.12 and
10.1.1.12.203 on which Memcache server is started the following way
memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.33.143.203 -p 11211 -m 64 -x 192.168.13.242 -v
net.rubyeye.xmemcached.exception.MemcachedException: Xmemcached is
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, SAE simsimil...@googlemail.com wrote:
But as explained above. If one of the memcached servers goes down. Some
users experience the problem, that they not only get logged out but also
have problems browsing the site at all or logging back in. Every page needs
Hi ,
I have memcached-14.5 and -repcached-2.2 installed on memcached on ubuntu.
They install went great and when i start memcached i get: replication:
connect (peer=server1:11212) replication: marugoto copying replication:
close replication: listen This looks good and for testing purpose i
Hi all,
I am a graduate student at UC San Diego and we recently presented a paper
on latency bottlenecks in cloud. Our study used Memcached as an example of
latency sensitive application. I want to share some of our results with you
all.
In our study we found that Memcached application logic
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I have memcached-14.5 and -repcached-2.2 installed on memcached on ubuntu.
They install went great and when i start memcached i get: replication:
connect (peer=server1:11212) replication: marugoto copying replication:
a point... a query like
select * from session_table where session_id='x'
where session_id is a primary key is very very fast, we are talking
about 0.1 seconds, with memcached you are trying to go down to 0.01
seconds
why should you care about speed in internet if the time to consider a
page
hum, could you reproduce the tests with last 3.6.3 kernel? i'm not
sure but i read some changes in latency of kernel maybe this could
help too since you tested with 2.6.28
2012/10/22 Rishi rkapoor.ri...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I am a graduate student at UC San Diego and we recently presented a
Hi ,
I am using Memcace server as active active (Master Master ) where two
servers will be reciving requests , and applied repcached to those servers
for replication
What i observed is that the CAS Key stored by XMemcacheClient 1.3.5 is not
being replicated among hese servers
RIght now
10 matches
Mail list logo
