Hi Jaqueline,
Mark Talluto wrote:
...
Use the answer effect command to bring up the dialog. Create the
transition you want in this window. When you hit the OK button, the
effect will be stored in the it variable. The string will be quite
long
so do not be surprised.
That was the
Klaus Major wrote:
One has to check all the available effects, choose one or more, store
it/them (see below)
and use it later in a script...
Hm. That's what I did yesterday and it didn't work. I did it again today
and it does work. So I must have done something stupid late at night.
Wouldn't
This one is a lot less fun, but I found this as well:
(If you dig in the Quicktime docs, you can probably even find the parameters
for all of these- parameters each have their own 4-char code, for example
wpID for the type of wipe. Just base64Encode() the 4-char code and look for
it in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this (which knowledge of one or two already helped me find):
answer effect
answer (base64Decode(char 82 to 89 of it))
You 'bout one smart cookie. :) I can see a couple of hundred people
pasting this into their script libraries -- it works great.
In the two
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one will find the difference areas between two effect descriptions- this
nails down about where you can find the actual parameter values. This is
useful if you choose the same effect twice with the same parameters, but
choose two different values. Presumably you
I tried to have a look at the "effects" substack, because there were no
responses to the above message so far, but apparently there is no
substack for the QT effects.
What QT effects substack are you referring to?
For a stack with scripted QT effects, it takes several seconds for the
first
Monte Goulding wrote/ schreef:
Are all the QT effects meant to work? any variation or just the base thing?
Implode and Explade only do it one way. There are some cool effects but they
don't work. Are they going to?
There is another problem, too. If I ask for the qtEffects, I get a Dutch
list
