Does anyone know...does MT support the N mini-pci cards? I have a client
who wants an all N indoor installation for his private network. Would
love to stick with MT if possible.
Cameron
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, ccrum wrote:
Does anyone know...does MT support the N mini-pci cards? I have a
client who wants an all N indoor installation for his private
network. Would love to stick with MT if possible.
At the MUM in Florida, some of the MT guys were
Why not just Mac Telnet/Winbox into into it? What is connected on the
other side? Is it another MT? Is it something you can VPN into? If it is
another MT, then just log into that MT and then MAC telnet (open the
Neighbors list and right click on it to pull down an options
menu...select mac teln
Roger Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] $10/tail
Aaron, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet wrote:
Hi Everybody:
I would like to apologize to the guys over at wirelessinteractive.com.
My last post was not very well thought out.
I fully intended to speak to Jeff over at wi
Where did you find the wiki?
Cameron
Carl A jeptha wrote:
Using ver. 3.0 on main gateway and am trying to prioritize my VOIP
traffic. Trying to follow a WIKI and the RTP packet-mark is working but
my simple queue attached to the packet-mark is not working.
On which board?
Mike Delp wrote:
Jim,
I have had Success with both Sprint and Verizon Air Cards with Mikrotik. They
are a sierra wireless card, and they make a pretty mean mobile router platform.
Thanks
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Jim Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mikrot
I'm interested. What is it?
Cameron
Butch Evans wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Mike Delp wrote:
I have used the pcmcia on a Soekris 4511, and the USB Sierra card
on a RB230.
Both of these work very well, too. I have several of these deployed
with very good results (mostly the 4511).
It should be based on what your default route is in the ip routes table
isshouldn't it?
Keith Barber wrote:
Good morning all,
I was working over the weekend switching my routers over from being behind NAT to having
full blown public ips. I was hoping to be able to "overlay" the public IP
So how big a suitcase do you need to get this thin on a plane? And
forget going with a carry on only.
Cameron
Robert Andrews wrote:
I like how they use a 15db yagi instead of a 19db panel to make it look
meaner
Casey Mills wrote:
http://www.i-hacked.com/index.php?option=com_content&t
I've got 3 brand new 192 that are all showing the same problem. When I
try to boot them, I get the single beep for power but never any double
beep. I've attached a serial cable and rebooted and here is what I get:
setting up elf image... OK
jumping to kernel code
and then it freezes.
Any ide
ssage and any
attachment(s) is strictly prohibited.
On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:46 AM, ccrum wrote:
I've got 3 brand new 192 that are all showing the same problem. When I
try to boot them, I get the single beep for power but never any double
beep. I've attached a serial cable and reboo
Will the 150 cases work?
Mike Hammett wrote:
What are you guys using for your RB450s (or other board with several Ethernet
ports)? I'm looking to need a couple.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-- next part --
An HTML att
s
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "ccrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] RB450 external enclosure
Will the 150 cases work?
Mike Hammett wrote:
What ar
I'm pretty sure you can do this in the ip-routes table. Go to the rules,
put in the src address, the dst-address, action lookup and give it a
table name. Then add another default route with your "other router's ip"
as the gateway and give it a routing mark = to the table name you
created under
I've connected two remote offices using two MT's, one as a VPN server
and one as a client. I've set up static routes in the routes table as
outlined in the documentation so that each network can now ping ip's on
the other side, and print to each other's TCP/IP printers. I am having
difficulty s
t makes it a pain is that netbios is not passing the VPN
> like expected. It shouldn't be that hard to make a few firewall rules
> to keep unwanted DHCP out.
>
> Casey
>
>
>
> On 5/8/08, ccrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've connected two remote offices us
xpected. It shouldn't be that hard to make a few firewall rules
to keep unwanted DHCP out.
Casey
On 5/8/08, ccrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've connected two remote offices using two MT's, one as a VPN server
and one as a client. I've set up static routes in the ro
I have set up some 900 MHz APs running 5 MHz channels on 3.9. Wen I scan
from my CPE, also running 3.9, I get 3 of each AP on 3 different 2.4
channels. The strongest is always the channel I'm supposed to be on, but
ther eare still 2 others listed. Does anyone know why?
Cameron
Yep...haven't been able to get my hands on some of the Pac 900 wave
guides for a few weeks. Had to go with someone else.
Cameron
Mike Hammett wrote:
Let's hear your stories about the Laird acquisition of PacWireless. From what
I've heard:
They can't run the new warehouse worth a darn
Most i
Yep...have over 500 in use from AP's to CPE's. Works well.
Cameron
Aaron, Network Administrator, Great Lakes Internet, Inc. wrote:
Hi Everyone:
Does anybody know if the NMP8602-Plus card is compatible with routeros?
http://www.wisp-router.com/wri/itemdesc.asp?ic=NMP8602%2DPlus&eq=&Tp=
Also d
I do this in a few remote places where I only need to serve a couple
people and have no other way. We put a private block of ip's on the AP
side and then masquerade them. The Public IP usually sits on the BH
radio. We also route through publics if needed for our clients, but of
course that is
I've got a client who needs to connect two devices on the same subnet
through a routed wireless network. The devices are connected to switches
which connect to the ethernet ports of the MT's on each side. The AP
side (side A) has a device of 10.2.1.3 and the CPE side (side B) has a
device of 1
Tried it like on the wiki, but it did not work.
Cameron
Kevin Neal wrote:
Ethernet over IP sounds like what you're looking for. Look it up on the
wiki, I've only done it once.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
We nat our cpes, run them as routers so the customer gets another nat,
and then dome of them run routers behind our routers. No issues...
Richard Hatherill Jr. wrote:
Setting up my first cpe's using Mik.
The rest of my network has been Tranzeo cpe-15-19's.
I can't figure out how to bridge on
We are acquiring a small wisp near us and need to get everyone to switch
over their accounts. We typically run our entire network as a "hotspot"
so people are forced to sign up and log in. This new company has several
T1's which we are contractually obligated to pay for another 6 months.
These
Simple answer is no. 25 dB is pretty damn good...most dual pol feeds are
good to get between 15 and 20 dB isolation, but I'd be willing to bet
that you'd ever really see that on the same antenna with the same
frequency if you put it on a spectrum analyzer and checked it. I've done
a lot of dual
UDP...TCP is about 20-22 Mbps.
Cameron
Robert Andrews wrote:
Is that tcp or udp?
Robert
ccrum wrote:
Simple answer is no. 25 dB is pretty damn good...most dual pol feeds are
good to get between 15 and 20 dB isolation, but I'd be willing to bet
that you'd ever really see that o
I've seen this exact problem on sectors with heavy interference. Some of
my sectors are picking up as many as 100 other radios (other wisps, home
routers, etc.) spread over all channels. I can tell you that some radios
handle this better than others. Several of my older APs that were still
runn
I've got several dual-nstreme setups some with 532's and some newer with
433's. I use the Gabriel 3ft dual-pol antennas and they work great. I
had used 2 separate pac solid dishes on each end, but I get better
results with one dual-pol gabriel. Also, the pacs would lose
connectivity when the fe
What size and how much?
Cameron
Terri Kelley wrote:
@ Randy
My main path covers several hops so am using several different
frequencies. I keep an eye on what is coming in and going out of a
particular tower and plan for at least the recommended separation
between freqs. Most often I am able
4:05 PM, ccrum wrote:
What size and how much?
Cameron
Terri Kelley wrote:
@ Randy
My main path covers several hops so am using several different
frequencies. I keep an eye on what is coming in and going out of a
particular tower and plan for at least the recommended separation
between freqs
I would recommend 3 boxes with 1 radio each. It is a relatively small
expense and it will last a long time into future growth. I'd bet the
RB433AH would handle all three cards and as long as you don't use the
same channels, you should be OK, but I still say split them out.
Cameron
Wayne, Tech
Does anyone know if there is a way to get ethernet link status through
snmp? I've found the AdminStatus and OperStatus, but they both seem to
only report whether the interface is enabled or not. I need to know if
the link status is OK or if there is "no-link" like when you run the
monitor. I gu
That worked. Thanks.
Cameron
> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 08:52 -0600, ccrum wrote:
>> Does anyone know if there is a way to get ethernet link status through
>> snmp? I've found the AdminStatus and OperStatus, but they both seem to
>> only report whether the interface is
for this situation, a MUCH lower gain antenna will help. You can use a
higher power transmitter to make up the difference to your (assumed)
relatively close hotspot subscribers. If you are using a high gain omni,
like 12 or 15 dBi, the elevation or vertical pattern will be very flat,
very narro
Sounds like it could be an antenna issue. Have you replaced the omni yet?
Cameron
Terri Kelley wrote:
Have an issue with a 900mhz 13dbi omni where the rx strength on the
omni is apprx 17 to 20 db worse than the rx strength from the omni to
the CPEs. On the AP, the board/radio are located close
bited.
On Apr 15, 2009, at 11:03 PM, ccrum wrote:
Sounds like it could be an antenna issue. Have you replaced the omni
yet?
Cameron
Terri Kelley wrote:
Have an issue with a 900mhz 13dbi omni where the rx strength on the
omni is apprx 17 to 20 db worse than the rx strength from the omni
t
Most grids in the 5.8 range will work pretty well in the 5.3 range. Hech,
I've even seen them work at short distances in the 2.4 range in an
emergency.
Cameron
> I am going to be setting up a very short range (think 300ft) 5.2GHz
> link. Do you think I would have any problem using a 5.8GHz grid f
I've had difficulty with two radios on a single 433ah when one of them
is an XR5. It seems to be overdriving the other radio card to the point
that throughput is non-existent. I don't have this problem on my 532A's.
I'm guessing it is because there is a ground plane (the board itself)
between t
ouches the outside of the mmcx connector and creates a ground.
Just a suggestion..
robert
ccrum wrote:
I've had difficulty with two radios on a single 433ah when one of
them is an XR5. It seems to be overdriving the other radio card to
the point that throughput is non-existent. I don't have
OK, I'm really stumped. I've got 1 sector on a three sectored site that
is misbehaving very badly. It originally had a 532A with an 8602 plus
running 11-B, with a 20 ft LMR-400 cable and 18.5 dBi v-pol antenna.
Clients are either Tranzeo CPE-200-15s or MT 133c or MT 411 (all MT's
have 8602 plus
If you are running 4.0.2 on the Tranzeo rigs, can you do a configuration
file dump to the list?
ryan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, ccrum wrote:
OK, I'm really stumped. I've got 1 sector on a three sectored site that is
misbehaving very badly. It originally had a 532A with an 86
e
Tranzeos to new 4.0.2 firmware or change out all the way.
Steve Barnes
Manager
PCS-WIN
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of ccrum
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 3:11 PM
APs/CPE?
If you are running 4.0.2 on the Tranzeo rigs, can you do a configuration
file dump to the list?
ryan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, ccrum wrote:
OK, I'm really stumped. I've got 1 sector on a three sectored site that
is
misbehaving very badly. It o
ranzeo CPE and the Mtik APs/CPE?
If you are running 4.0.2 on the Tranzeo rigs, can you do a configuration
file dump to the list?
ryan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, ccrum wrote:
OK, I'm really stumped. I've got 1 sector on a three sectored site that
is
misbehaving very
: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of ccrum
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:17 AM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Very strange MT issue
A good portion of the 90 AP's are 2wire routers...thanks ATT. The others
are competing w
You could download and modify the hotspot page to have a simple "I
agree" button that just logs everyone in with the same username. Put a
session timeout on the user for 24 hours or whatever and make sure you
have unlimited logins. If you need help with the page, let me know.
Cameron
Steve Ba
le, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:41 PM, ccrum wrote:
You could download and modify the hotspot page to have a simple "I agree"
button that just logs everyone in with the same username. Put a session
timeout on the user for 24 hours
I think it depends on the name. If you name them the same it will
probably throw and error and continue. If you name then different, then
it will set up a new queue and use the one that is the highest number in
the list.
Cameron
Brian Bearce wrote:
Just curious. I have setup queues manually
Ralph,
If your block of publics is on the same interface as the hotspot, you
don't need to do anything. Simply assign them the public they want
staticly.
Cameron
Ralph wrote:
I have some customers behind a hotspot who are willing to pay for a public
address.
I wonder if someone could help m
Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of ccrum
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:58 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] SRCNAT through hotspot
Ralph,
If your block of publics is on the same interface as the
Is this Maxi Gastaldo?
[Max] wrote:
Hi.
I want to know if somebody knows an mesh implementation (like
municipies or goverment) with Mikrotik. I am working on city mesh and
i have to show succesful cases with this tecnology.
You know anyone?
Regards
M.
Can't you do this on MT with the Advertisement under hotspot?
> On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 12:39 -0400, Ralph wrote:
>> I'm looking for ideas on how to send messages to hotspot customers.
>
> Eje at Wisp-router has put together a solution like this. It works in
> conjunction with his hotspot signup sy
I've established a pptp connection to a router that has multiple private
subnets from windows (multile machines on differnet networks). Most of the
subnets are 10.xxx.xxx.xxx but one is 172.xxx.xxx.xxx. The PPTP gives me
an address on a 10.xx subnet and I can hit everything else that begins
with 10
Well, the computers are all MS, but different versions. I've unchecked the
use default gateway in the connection becasue I don't want to use the
gateway of the remote router, just have access to the network. I tried
adding a static route to the routing table and it does work. Unfortunately
I really
Hey Butch,
We run our entire network as a hotspot. Each AP does its own HS
management and hands out its own ip's(private) via dhcp. We have a
common radius server (Free Radius). We do not encrypt the wireless stream.
Cameron
Butch Evans wrote:
What is your preferred method for securing the
favor. Muchas gracias.
PAntes de imprimir este e-mail, piensa en si es realmente necesario: El
Medio Ambiente es responsabilidad de todos
-Original Message-
From: ccrum
To: Mikrotik discussions
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:31:25 -0600
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Wireless security
I used to have a boss tell me "There's 24 hours a dayand then there
is the night." He was a slave driver.
Cameron
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 10:47 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
This has happened three times in the last two days. Started with 4.0 and
the problem exists on 4.
RM is a good free prop tool although better ones do exist, but are very
costly. I know as I have been involved on the dev side of one before.
The Longley-Rice model used in RM is a decent model, but is not super
accurate. It is however, public domain, so that is why Roger can give
the program a
I've been doing this for a long time especially on hotspot setups. It
really helps when changing out wireless cards to just have to add them
to the bridge and not have to worry about dhcp servers, ip addresses, etc.
Cameron
Craig Baird wrote:
That's an interesting thought. If you did that, a
I use burst queues like this for all my users...here is an example:
name="" target-addresses=10.71.0.118/32
dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both
priority=8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=350k/350k
max-limit=350k/350k burst-limit=1100k/1100k b
I've done this with dst-nat before, but never a netmap. I can help if
you want to try that way.
Cameron
Bill Prince wrote:
OK, I'll play your silly little game. Sending this in plain text even
tho it mucks up the simple formatting.
original msg:
=
Does this data stay after a reboot?
Butch Evans wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 18:24 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
You can see the relative information, but what I am looking for is more
along the lines of this customer used 25GB this month, 20GB last month and
150GB that month they found Netflix
We are "re-doing" a significant portion of our backhaul due to obtaining
a new provider that is coming in on the opposite side of our network. As
an interim step I've added some devices to a tower and will eventually
use a 493ah to handle a portion of the routing. Right now, though, I
just need
I've got a perl script that will do it. It takes a file with a list of ip
addresses, and assumes that all usernames are the same. Let me know if you
want it.
Cameron
> I will have to hunt it down since I have changed computers since then
> sigh. It was a combination of a backup by ssh keys, a
Already ordered one two weeks ago...waiting on arrival. COuld be interesting.
Cameron
> Hey Guys,
>
> Don't know if anyone has seen these devices before (We have 2 Fit-PC2's
> in my house) but here goes.
> The fit-pc2 was/is a small 1.6ghz computer using incredibly low power,
> operating under te
OK...it is simple enough That I'll just post it here:
Perl Code is:
use Net::Telnet;
use Net::FTP;
my ($rtr_ip);
#open router input file and cylce through it
open(infile, "router_ips.txt");
my $line_cnt;
my $usr;
my $pwd;
#loop through
The master still functions...it's ether1 on the 493's that is not part of
the same chip so you only get the bottom row of 8 ports. You could create
a bridge though and add ether1, but that defeats the purpose of the chip.
Cameron
> Probably more information then you're asking for...
>
> http://wi
Does anyone have any experience with creating an IPsec tunnel between a MT
and a Cicso? I've been through just about everything online I can finda dn
all the settings seem correct. It appears from the Cisco side that the MT
is not accepting phase 1. I can see the Cisco trying to connect from the
ot
I don't have access to the Cisco and they are unwilling to set up the ip
ip tunnel. That example won't work for me.
Cameron
> Try half of this...
>
> http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/IPSec_VPN_with_Dynamic_Routing_/_Mikrotik_and_Cisco
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
begin_of_the_skype_highli
I've seen all these and have my router configured this way. It is still
not responding to the Cisco. I can see the Cisco try to establish the
tunnel, but the other end is saying the MT is not responding to it. Is
there some "secret sauce" that I need for it to talk to the Cisco?
Cameron
> You don
GRRturns out the guy on the Cisco side gave me the WRONG SHARED
SECRET. What a waste of time. The config of course worked as soon as I put
the correct secret in. Sorry to bother everyone with this.
Cameron
> I've seen all these and have my router configured this way. It is still
> not res
72 matches
Mail list logo
