Hi all,
I´m trying to block some spammers but my rule is not working
Spammer Address: www-data@test@hotmail.com
Here is the rule.
sub filter_sender {
my ($sender, $ip, $hostname, $helo) = @_;
if ($sender =~ /^?'www-data@test'\@hotmail\.com?$/i) {
return ('REJECT',
On 4/23/2014 2:21 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote:
Spammer Address: www-data@test@hotmail.com http://hotmail.com
[...]
if ($sender =~ /^?'www-data@test'\@hotmail\.com?$/i) {
You have an extra set of single quotes in your regex.
___
NOTE: If there
Yes. I tried also with only quote and the messages still pass. :(
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Apr, 2014, at 5:59 pm, Matt Garretson ma...@assembly.state.ny.us
wrote:
On 4/23/2014 2:21 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote:
Spammer Address: www-data@test@hotmail.com http://hotmail.com
[...]
if
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Jon Rowlan wrote:
I am rather embarrassed to say that after years of using MD, I have
recently decided to bite the bullet and install a new Debian version and
update all the associated tools that I use and for the life of me I
cannot get md_syslog to work.
Might be a stupid
On 4/23/2014 5:43 PM, Ricardson Williams wrote:
Yes. I tried also with only quote and the messages still pass. :(
Have you ever used the filter_sender and have you enabled it?
For example, in /etc/sysconfig/mimedefang, change this:
# If yes, turn on the multiplexor sender checking function
Hello all,
Is there a way to add a new (additional) attachment to an email?
Is there a way to duplicate an attachment and re-attach it to the same
email?
The original attachment (if present) would still be processed normally.
Thanks,
Michael
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Might be a stupid question, but anyway: are you sure that you have a
syslog daemon installed.
Not really a stupid question Kees, I hadn't checked that :-)
I am using Wheezy and this is a clean new install and not an upgrade.
Syslogd is a virtual package as far as I can tell from Aptitude. It's
Hi,
i use a filter_sender clause to skip any filtering if the mail is sent
by authentified users from smtp_auth
ii mimedefang 2.69-1 e-mail
filter program for sendmail
ii sendmail 8.14.3-9.4 powerful,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014, Ghislain wrote:
i use a filter_sender clause to skip any filtering if the mail is sent by
authentified users from smtp_auth
ii mimedefang 2.69-1 e-mail filter
program for sendmail
Le 16/04/2014 13:02, Steffen Kaiser a écrit :
md_syslog('warning', $RelayAddr . / . $SendmailMacros{auth_authen})
ok you helped me found the bug as the auth appear there, it seems that
it was the comparison operator that was not a good perl one
($SendmailMacros{auth_authen} !=
On 4/14/2014 10:06 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
Specifically, here's a test from my Yahoo! account to an autism
mailing list. Even though smfi_chgfrom appears to have worked, when
the email is parsed by mailman, it does not appear to reflect the
changed sender. Any thoughts appreciated...
On 4/14/2014 10:50 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
DMARC is actually checking the header From, not just the envelope
$Sender,
Thanks. That's what I was overlooking.
The problem I've got at our gateway is that milter gives us the
@Recipient as in the RCPT TO, but I need to know what the recipient is
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:35:19 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
- All the various recipients that acknowledge p=reject reject the
mail as forged
That's the part I don't understand. Mail from my list will not have
a yahoo.com envelope sender. And if I remove the DKIM header, what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I regret to inform Yahoo users that they may no longer post to any mailing
list hosted on lists.roaringpenguin.com.
The reason is a recent policy change by Yahoo to their DMARC policy that
makes third-party servers reject mailing list traffic
On 4/15/2014 9:52 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:35:19 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
- All the various recipients that acknowledge p=reject reject the
mail as forged
That's the part I don't understand. Mail from my list will not have
a yahoo.com envelope
On 2014-4-15 4:50 , Joseph Brennan wrote:
DMARC is actually checking the header From, not just the envelope
$Sender, and Yahoo is telling recipient systems to reject if the
header From has a yahoo.com address and the message was not sent
(directly) by yahoo.com. This breaks mailing lists and
On the way home I realized... all that was based on the envelope sender,
and they're checking the header From. I keep forgetting we're in some other
world where we're not checking the sender. Oh well, it's still nice to keep
my hand in doing sendmail.cf. It's been a while.
Maybe a
We are having issues with Yahoo's DMARC policy unsubscribing a very
large number of members for Mailman lists we host.
Does anyone have a quick piece of code that we can use which bounces
their message and inserts a nice description of why?
We are already matching on Yahoo senders to
On 4/14/2014 12:50 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
We are having issues with Yahoo's DMARC policy unsubscribing a very
large number of members for Mailman lists we host.
Does anyone have a quick piece of code that we can use which bounces
their message and inserts a nice description of why?
We are
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:27:58 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
However, we are seeing an issue with the change_sender(); function.
Specifically, here's a test from my Yahoo! account to an autism
mailing list. Even though smfi_chgfrom appears to have worked, when
the email is
if ($Sender =~ /kevin_mcgrail\@yahoo\.com?$/i and
($recip =~ m/\@mailman\./i or
DMARC is actually checking the header From, not just the envelope $Sender,
and Yahoo is telling recipient systems to reject if the header From has a
yahoo.com address and the message was not
All,
I thought this might be a good list where some people might care/comment
on a TLS/Sendmail issue we uncovered while dealing with Heartbleed.
We're using Sendmail 8.14.5 on a machine that had OpenSSL 1.0.0j. As a
safety measure due to heartbleed, we upgraded to open OpenSSL 1.0.1g.
We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
I use stream_by_domain and like to redirect/move spam for a single
domain to a special recipient/mailbox and collect it there. Any better
code possible?
sub filter_end {
[...]
if ($Domain eq
Hi Steffen,
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2014, 08:10 +0200 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
I use stream_by_domain and like to redirect/move spam for a single
domain to a special recipient/mailbox and collect it there. Any better
code possible?
sub
Hi,
I use stream_by_domain and like to redirect/move spam for a single
domain to a special recipient/mailbox and collect it there. Any better
code possible?
sub filter_end {
[...]
if ($Domain eq 'mydomain.de' $hits = 5) {
foreach $recip (@Recipients) {
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, David F. Skoll wrote:
Post-Cisco, ClamAV seems to have greatly declined in usefulness.
It catches hardly anything anymore... anyone else experiencing this?
Yes.
OTOH I don't really care, as having no Windows machines I mainly use
it for the third-party
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
for some of my domains I'd like to reject mails at a given spamscore of
=5. For some other domains at a higher score. Is it a good idea to read
those domain names from different external config file
(Please keep replies on-list.)
Marcus Schopen wrote:
Thanks for your idea and code. Nice idea! How did you create and modify
the BerkeleyDB from console? Never did this by hand only via tools like
saslpasswd e.g. for my cyrus/sendmail user db.
I think it took a bit of fine-tuning to get the
Hi,
for some of my domains I'd like to reject mails at a given spamscore of
=5. For some other domains at a higher score. Is it a good idea to read
those domain names from different external config file instead of
coding them hard into mimedefang-milter?
sub filter_end {
[...]
if (($Domain eq
Marcus Schopen wrote:
z for some of my domains I'd like to reject mails at a given spamscore of
=5. For some other domains at a higher score. Is it a good idea to read
those domain names from different external config file instead of
coding them hard into mimedefang-milter?
I did this a number
Hello,
Can anybody help me figure out why the below code in
/etc/mail/mimedefang-filter rejects email from all connecting sender ip's?
##
sub filter_relay {
my ( $ip, $name, $helo) = @_;
if (relay_is_blacklisted($ip, ‘zen.spamhaus.org’)) {
return(‘REJECT’,
I have to agree I find ClamAV is not catching many virus recently (over
the last few years). Great for catch old ones, but any thing new is not
being caught.
I know this since on the Windows desktops we run Trend and it catches a
lot of e-mail attachments which look bad.
Problem we run
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:45:46 +
Andrew Watkins and...@dcs.bbk.ac.uk wrote:
I should tighten up on our extension blocking.
Talking of extension blocking, I found a very nice tool called lsar
that's part of the unar package. This is packaged in Debian
(apt-get install unar) and source is
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:43:22 +0100
Lars Bjærris l...@daxzuli.com wrote:
sub filter_relay {
my ( $ip, $name, $helo) = @_;
if (relay_is_blacklisted($ip, ‘zen.spamhaus.org’)) {
return(‘REJECT’, ‘You are listed in zen.spamhaus.org’);
}
}
You don't return
On Mar 21, 2014, at 2:30 PM, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 08:43:22 +0100
Lars Bjærris l...@daxzuli.com wrote:
sub filter_relay {
my ( $ip, $name, $helo) = @_;
if (relay_is_blacklisted($ip, ‘zen.spamhaus.org’)) {
return(‘REJECT’,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Anne Bennett wrote:
A belated thanks for the patch! ;-) What are you using now
for anti-virus?
No problem :-)
Personally and professionally I've used ClamAV (via clamd) for a long
time. I actually used to be a team member pre-Cisco, pre-SourceFire.
I've used Avira
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:49:32 -0400 (EDT)
Jason Englander ja...@englanders.us wrote:
Personally and professionally I've used ClamAV (via clamd) for a
long time. I actually used to be a team member pre-Cisco,
pre-SourceFire.
Post-Cisco, ClamAV seems to have greatly declined in usefulness.
It
DFS wrote on 03/20/2014 03:04:07 PM:
Post-Cisco, ClamAV seems to have greatly declined in usefulness.
It catches hardly anything anymore... anyone else experiencing this?
In my experience, most of the commercial AV scanners for Linux are
horrible.
They often use undocumented wire protocols
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 15:04 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
Post-Cisco, ClamAV seems to have greatly declined in usefulness.
It catches hardly anything anymore... anyone else experiencing this?
Are you using clamav-unofficial-signatures? We are.
I have no idea how much we should be catching. But
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:46:49 -0400
wbr...@e1b.org wrote:
We haven't seen an increase in virii detected by McAfee or Symantec
on servers downstream from our CanIt system. Maybe that's because
blocking the unsafe extensions kills them before we even call ClamAV.
I've attached the statistics
Jason Englander responds to my question:
I wonder if there are any other Sophie users out there?
Sophos has announced that they're retiring v4 of Sophos
Anti-Virus for {Linux,Unix} this April, and I have no idea
if v9 will be compatible with Sophie (haven't tried it yet),
I'm the one that
I find myself in the same boat. Browsing the Sophos web site I find a product
called SAV Dynamic Interface. The documentation suggests it provides a daemon
which supports the Sophie protocol. I'm hoping that means the same interface
mimedefang uses to talk to sophie.
I'll hopefully get some
Hi,
is it possible to reject a message if it's sending server is listed in
more than one given DNS-blacklists before the message is running into
further resource hungry spamassassin content filtering? I'd like to
reject messages from a server if its IP is found in at least _two_ of
four given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
is it possible to reject a message if it's sending server is listed in
use the Net::DNS resolver and query the blacklists. mimedefang.pl has the
skeleton how to query.
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:16:53 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser skmimedef...@smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de wrote:
use the Net::DNS resolver and query the blacklists. mimedefang.pl has
the skeleton how to query.
I also maintain a nice CPAN module:
I wonder if there are any other Sophie users out there?
Sophos has announced that they're retiring v4 of Sophos
Anti-Virus for {Linux,Unix} this April, and I have no idea
if v9 will be compatible with Sophie (haven't tried it yet),
but since Sophie has apparently had no development since about
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Anne Bennett wrote:
I wonder if there are any other Sophie users out there?
Sophos has announced that they're retiring v4 of Sophos
Anti-Virus for {Linux,Unix} this April, and I have no idea
if v9 will be compatible with Sophie (haven't tried it yet),
but since Sophie has
On Mar 14, 2014, at 13:30 , Kees Theunissen c.j.theunis...@differ.nl wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Fredrik Pettai wrote:
Hi,
I want to disable the virus scanner (ClamAV).
If you want to disable all virus scanners (not only ClanAV) then
just remove the line:
my($code, $category, $action)
Hi Paul,
I thought that filter_recipient would be the best place but my
filter_recipient doesn't seem to get called. I think I wrote the
function some years ago but never set the trigger up.
Back to the man I think :-)
Many thanks for the feedback, that's a very useful explanation I will
keep
Hi all,
I want to collect the sender, recipient and IP of the sending server in
a single line in my log file.
I don't seem to have the recipient in the arguments to filter_sender and
I don't really want to turn on filter_recipient
And for servers listed to allow relay in access MD does not seem
Jon,
Filter_sender is called after the MAIL FROM stage of the SMTP dialog, so
the recipients are unknown at this time.
Filter_recipient is called once per envelope recipient (RCPT TO in the
SMTP dialog). You can write the (sender, recipient, RelayAddr) tuple
out from here using md_syslog, which
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Fredrik Pettai wrote:
Hi,
I want to disable the virus scanner (ClamAV).
If you want to disable all virus scanners (not only ClanAV) then
just remove the line:
my($code, $category, $action) = message_contains_virus();
and the code handling the scan results from the
Hi,
I upgraded perl + mimedefang, and then I tested the filter, it looks like this:
bash-4.2$ mimedefang.pl -test
main::rebuild_entity() called too early to check prototype at
/usr/pkg/bin/mimedefang.pl line 805.
Filter /usr/pkg/etc/mimedefang/mimedefang-filter seems syntactically correct.
New
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:50:22 +0100
Fredrik Pettai pet...@nordu.net wrote:
main::rebuild_entity() called too early to check prototype
at /usr/pkg/bin/mimedefang.pl line 805.
I have a patch in our git repo to fix this; just haven't done a new
MIMEDefang release yet.
diff --git
Hi,
I want to disable the virus scanner (ClamAV).
I've tried to add this to global part of mimedefang-filter:
[…]
# Disable Checking inside Zip
#$Features{Archive::Zip} = ;
# Disable ClamAV
$Features{Virus:CLAMAV} = ;
$Features{Virus:CLAMD} = ;
# Detect and load Perl modules
On Mar 13, 2014, at 17:49 , Fredrik Pettai pet...@nordu.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to disable the virus scanner (ClamAV).
I've tried to add this to global part of mimedefang-filter:
[…]
# Disable Checking inside Zip
#$Features{Archive::Zip} = ;
# Disable ClamAV
$Features{Virus:CLAMAV}
Hi Everyone,
So I wanted to be able to answer what and why we blocked various
attachments.
Towards that end, for our installation, we wrote this page
https://raptor.pccc.com/raptor.cgim?template=blocked_files
To help out MD, we also wrote the following patch to help document in
the
My own postings to one of my Mailman lists is being rejected. My outbound
message is using my own SMTP server and Mailman is on the same fedora
machine. How can I fix this? This is maddening
Mar 3 12:04:09 zippity mimedefang.pl[27748]: s23H43EK028228:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:26:29 -0800
Web Analysts christ...@web-analysts.net wrote:
My own postings to one of my Mailman lists is being rejected. My
outbound message is using my own SMTP server and Mailman is on the
same fedora machine. How can I fix this? This is maddening
Well, something in
If the spam is being relayed out through your filter, your IP address
is likely to be the one that will get blacklisted. It will
be seen as the source of the spam. You might want to look into rate
limiting your customers as well as scanning the messages.
To a certain extent that is already
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:30:35 -
Jon Rowlan jon.row...@sads.com wrote:
It just makes sense for me to RBL check the sending servers because
that is where the problem is and indeed we are finding these sending
servers listed on RBL servers - ours does not seem to get blacklisted.
MIMEDefang
Leading question: Do you test outbound email for spam?
I use sendmail/md/sa/clam to test for inbound, I actually don't know
whether any checks are performed on the outgoing by this combination of
systems, I would have thought that some check are made on mail going out
as well as in.
The systems
Jon wrote on 02/25/2014 04:15:31 AM:
I use sendmail/md/sa/clam to test for inbound, I actually don't know
whether any checks are performed on the outgoing by this combination of
systems, I would have thought that some check are made on mail going out
as well as in.
The systems relaying are
I'd like to get MD to email an alert to postmaster when one of my
customer relay servers is featured on an RBL list. I use
MD/Clam/SA/Sendmail.
Currently if I allow a relay from a customer server, no RBL check is
done and it can be some time later that I discover I have been spammed
through.
Is
On 2/22/2014 4:54 AM, Jon Rowlan wrote:
I'd like to get MD to email an alert to postmaster when one of my
customer relay servers is featured on an RBL list. I use
MD/Clam/SA/Sendmail.
Currently if I allow a relay from a customer server, no RBL check is
done and it can be some time later that I
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
I'm planning to move SPOOLDIR (/var/spool/MIMEDefang) to tmps.
My /etc/fstab
tmpfs /var/spool/MIMEDefang tmpfs
Hi Kees,
I put $Features{'Path:QUARANTINEDIR'} to mimedefang.pl.conf and in my
case (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) .spamassassin is automatically located
under /var/spool/MD-Quarantine without changing home in passwd or
changing HOME=/var/spool/MD-Quarantine in /etc/init.d/mimedefang. Kind
of strange, but it
Hi,
I'm planning to move SPOOLDIR (/var/spool/MIMEDefang) to tmps.
My /etc/fstab
tmpfs /var/spool/MIMEDefang tmpfs
defaults,size=128m,mode=750,uid=ofdefanguser,gid=ofdefanggroup 0 0
This works fine, but mimedefang stores quarantinedir and spamassassin
bayes files in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
I'm planning to move SPOOLDIR (/var/spool/MIMEDefang) to tmps.
My /etc/fstab
tmpfs /var/spool/MIMEDefang tmpfs
defaults,size=128m,mode=750,uid=ofdefanguser,gid=ofdefanggroup 0 0
This works
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:19:01 +0100 (CET)
Kees Theunissen c.j.theunis...@differ.nl wrote:
I found this old message when I was searching my mailboxes for
malformed Content-Disposition MIME headers.
Note that the name= field in the Content-Disposition header above is
also wrong. This should be a
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, David F. Skoll wrote:
Hi,
We've run into a malformed MIME virus that has a structure like this:
=
To: some...@example.com
Subject: Payroll Received by Intuit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:08:38 +0100 (CET)
Steffen Kaiser skmimedef...@smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de wrote:
what would be a good way to implement rate-limiting for outbound
mails per sender e.g. 50 recipients per smtp_auth sender per hour?
I do this in filter_begin. There I detect the
On Feb 8, 2014, at 8:33 AM, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
I'm certainly not a fan of the walled garden which is a
major reason why I have an Android phone, but I'm pretty sure that
ship has sailed.
That's fine. Then what I'm doing is a quixotic indication of my core
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:53:41 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Which is definitely your prerogative. But if the software contains
community contributed enhancements, fixes, etc. is that a reasonable
decision to make unilaterally?
I do not care if it's
Hi,
what would be a good way to implement rate-limiting for outbound mails
per sender e.g. 50 recipients per smtp_auth sender per hour?
Ciao
Marcus
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Marcus Schopen wrote:
what would be a good way to implement rate-limiting for outbound mails
per sender e.g. 50 recipients per smtp_auth sender per hour?
I do this in filter_begin. There I detect the sender, assign a SenderID
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:13:04 -0800
John Nemeth jnem...@cue.bc.ca wrote:
[David Skoll]
} The best way to make a platform fail is for developers to
} boycott it.
I'm certainly not a fan of the walled garden which is a
major reason why I have an Android phone, but I'm pretty sure that
ship
On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:00 PM, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
No technical reason, I suppose, but I have a giant hate-on for Apple. :)
http://david.skoll.ca/blog/2010-05-18-anti-apple.html
You might be shooting yourself in the foot.
By making products such as Mimedefang
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:11:35 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
No technical reason, I suppose, but I have a giant hate-on for
Apple. :)
http://david.skoll.ca/blog/2010-05-18-anti-apple.html
You might be shooting yourself in the foot.
Shooting *myself*
On Feb 7, 8:54am, David F. Skoll wrote:
} On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:11:35 -0700
} Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
}
} By making products such as Mimedefang available to the walled
} garden Apple users, you're giving them a glimpse into a wider world...
}
} I do not
I have some clients that are MacOS X shops, including using a Mac server box as
their mail server.
They currently don’t use Mimedefang, but I’m trying to sell them on the idea.
MacOS already ships with Perl, SpamAssassin and Postfix, of course, so adding
Mimedefang should be a no-brainer.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:17:19 -0700
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Is there an obvious reason that Mimedefang isn't used with MacOS?
No technical reason, I suppose, but I have a giant hate-on for Apple. :)
http://david.skoll.ca/blog/2010-05-18-anti-apple.html
On Jan 29, 5:17pm, Philip Prindeville wrote:
}
} I have some clients that are MacOS X shops, including using a
} Mac server box as their mail server.
}
} They currently don't use Mimedefang, but I'm trying to sell them
} on the idea.
}
} MacOS already ships with Perl, SpamAssassin and Postfix,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014, Prabin Acharya wrote:
My mailserver has been compromised.
The scenario is: bogus users are using mailing address of my company
and sending spam messages.
Do you refer to this scenario as My mailserver has been compromised?
I've come across a situation at my work recently. My mailserver has
been compromised. We use sendmail with mimedefang. There was problem
of spam attacks a year ago but after having MD installed and running
it has been under control.
The scenario is: bogus users are using mailing address of my
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:27:15 +0545
Prabin Acharya m...@prabinacharya.com.np wrote:
I know my mail server is loose in terms of security
Well... you need to fix that first, don't you think?
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
Way back in July 2005 there was some discussion re- wisdom of
maintaining a database of spammy subject lines, and blocking on the
basis of this.
Consensus seems to have been that, in the majority of cases, Bayes was a
better bet.
Recently (over the last year or so) we've been seeing an increase
Sorry for the slightly off-topic posting.
I was looking at:
http://www.first.org/members/teams
and I couldn’t figure out what team handles unresolved complaints from French
ISPs (I’ve had ongoing issues with OVH and Proxad not only not dealing with
complaints, but bouncing emails to their
I like to use different configuration files for authenticated and
non-authenticated users.
Inside MD i call SA like
($hits, $req, $names, $report) =
spam_assassin_check('/etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf');
or
($hits, $req, $names, $report) =
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:28:51 +0100
Christoph Lehmann christoph.lehmann.germ...@web.de wrote:
I like to use different configuration files for authenticated and
non-authenticated users.
($hits, $req, $names, $report) =
spam_assassin_check('/etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf');
MIMEDefang uses a
MIMEDefang uses a persistent Mail::SpamAssassin object, unfortunately.
So once it's created, subsequent calls to spam_assassin_check simply
return the same object even if the config file is specified differently.
You can prevent this by calling:
undef $SASpamTester;
just before any of the
Hi David
Hmm, maybe you pointed me to the problem. Very strange, that this
sometimes work even if it's not supposed to work. Well I guess I
could store all changes via Storable and then pull them in
filter_begin.
Yes, you will need to do that. Let me know if that fixes it.
Yes, that
Hi,
I'm using Sendmail with mimedefang.
Recently a co-worker was having trouble with a company facebook
account and got Facebook to send her a 'reset-password' email.
When she received it, it came only with the following message:
This message contains a rich-text HTML portion. Consult
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:06:08 +0800
cc c...@belfordhk.com wrote:
My question is, how come I couldn't find This message ...
in mimedefang's sources?
Something in your filter is munging the email. You need to post your
filter for us to make any sense of what's going on.
Regards,
David.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, cc wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Sendmail with mimedefang.
Recently a co-worker was having trouble with a company facebook
account and got Facebook to send her a 'reset-password' email.
When she received it, it came only with the following message:
This message contains a
Hi David
I'm not familiar with Postfix, but this does sound like a Postfix bug.
I would post on a Postfix list because I think most of the people on this
list are Sendmail users...
Thank you for your reply. Via Postfix list I found someone who could tell me
how to enable the milter debugging
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:23:17 +0100
Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote:
That's pretty weird now, because I have added an md_syslog
instruction before those recipient changes dumping what is being
changed so I know they are being run.
Where are you calling action_add_recipient? It
Hello
We moved from sendmail to postfix (unfortunately but my admin colleagues
whated it that way).
We use MIMEDefang to do some sender / recipient rewriting, mainly to implement
email forwarding in a SRS compatible way.
Now I have found a situation, where add_recipient apparently fails, but
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:35:11 +0100
Benoit Panizzon benoit.paniz...@imp.ch wrote:
Same result, only local delivery.
I'm not familiar with Postfix, but this does sound like a Postfix bug.
I would post on a Postfix list because I think most of the people on this
list are Sendmail users...
If I want to add a header via:
$entity-head()-add(‘Received’, “some-multiline-folded-text”);
how do I encode the header value such that newlines aren’t stripped? Do I need
\r\n\t ? Or \n\t ?
I tried both but couldn’t get either to work.
Thanks.
1101 - 1200 of 13378 matches
Mail list logo
