On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:19:25 -0400, Brad wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
>
>You could post a URL that actually works..
>
>
Try http://www.petri.co.il/how_to_ask_a_question.htm
>From the lan
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:35:27 -0500
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be blunt, because when an enterprise just needs pure unfiltered
> inter-VLAN routing, Cisco has CEF products which can route between
> interfaces at bps and pps rates unapproachable using a general purpose
> Unix OS and COTS
I'm trying to build a pair of 3.7 machines, to replace a pair of 3.5
machines. These machine will be a simple firewall, not NAT'ing just an
internal, and an external interface, plus a dedicated network for pfsync.
At hte moment I'm having trouble getting failover to ork, when I fail one
of the sid
Hi,
Just a little question that came up when designing a firewall system
here, can a transparent bridge with pf do load balance to internal
server even if the ifaces don't have any IP adresses?
I have two ways to develop this firewall, or a transparent bridge on the
switch to router link, or an "f
Brad wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
>
> You could post a URL that actually works..
They took it down, but the KB article was "How to ask a question". The
text of the article seems to be
Vivek Ayer wrote:
Hi guys,
This has really been frustrating experience. I have a dual boot client
behind an OpenBSD firewall that uses a DHCP server. When I boot into
XP, I get an IP of 192.168.0.2 and in Linux I get 192.168.0.3. Because
of this, I can do port forwarding without editing pf.conf
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
> > Brad, think you can get them to start producing the 10Gb card I've
> > been talking to them for almost 2 years about?
> >
> > diana
>
> It would be nice if they even sent us the hardware that was offered via you
> quite some time ago nevermind vaporware 10Gb
On 7/20/05, Tim Hammerquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > Bruno Rohee wrote:
> > > Thus breaking a behaviour that people have been used too for about
> > > the last 30 years.
> >
> > Telnet was used for most of the last 30 years, too.
>
> telnet is still a wonderful tool t
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:23:04PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
> SNIP
> > I do not have any SK-based cards using the newer Yukon-2 chips. If someone
> > could get me a card or two then it would provide incentive to support the
> > cards. SysKonnect stuff is much b
Hi guys,
This has really been frustrating experience. I have a dual boot client
behind an OpenBSD firewall that uses a DHCP server. When I boot into
XP, I get an IP of 192.168.0.2 and in Linux I get 192.168.0.3. Because
of this, I can do port forwarding without editing pf.conf every boot.
Can I re
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
You could post a URL that actually works..
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Daniel Polak wrote:
SNIP
> Bill,
>
> As it happens I have been e-mailing with SysKonnect about the SK-9S22
> and a possible quad port card today!
> They are thinking about a doing a quad port card but need to be sure
> that there is enough interest.
> Anybody interested in a
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Brad wrote:
SNIP
> I do not have any SK-based cards using the newer Yukon-2 chips. If someone
> could get me a card or two then it would provide incentive to support the
> cards. SysKonnect stuff is much better than all the other Gig stuff out there.
Brad, hink you can get the
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555372
On 7/21/05, Steven Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/19/05, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
> >
> > i'm not sure why you picked those two; neither would be near the top of
> > any list i'd make. 6944a in particular is de(4), not the great
On 7/19/05, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
>
> > I need to add another ethernet card to the box, but have run out of
> > PCI slots. Currently there is an Intel dual port (fxp) in there and
> > I'm considering one of the above as a replacement. Co
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 21/07/05, Stephen Marley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> they do? I use xdm and I didnt use a sleep. Maybe its a kdm issue?
Yes, it's a kdm specific issue. It seems all gettys need to be spawned
before kdm kicks in otherwise the ke
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:13:48PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 20:06]:
> > On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > > > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above
Brandon Mercer wrote:
>Hello all,
>I've been playing around with database driven web stuff lately in the
>chrooted apache. I've got a pretty simple CGI written in C that selects
>all of my blog entries from a database and displays them in a web page.
>I got things working running httpd with the
* Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 20:06]:
> On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit route
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 09:05:13PM +0200, Daniel Polak wrote:
> Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02
>
> >All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
> >the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
> >will give it some thought
Original message from Bill Chmura at 21-7-2005 20:02
All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
will give it some thought, but the majority of the resources are
located in one spot. I will mull
On 21/07/05, Stephen Marley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > #based on a solution posted by S.Marley
> > >
> > > echo -n ' kdm'; (sleep 5; /usr/local/bin/kdm ${kdm_flags}) &
> > >
> >
> > Don't do that. Use /etc/ttys if thats t
I'll be presenting a talk and demonstration at the upcoming OSCON
event in Portland, OR on August 4th. If anyone's going to be in the
area Aug 1-4, I'd love to hook up for an ad-hoc OpenBSD BoF over some
beers.
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2005/view/e_sess/6475
--
Jason Dixon
Di
Thanks. I just wasn't sure if my problem was an openBSD problem or an assembly
problem. It's definitely the later. And I just found the amd64 ABI, which is
making the problems clear for me. Pushing those args on the stack is
definitely wrong.
Anyway, I appreciate the feedback. And thanks Art
All of the traffic pretty much will be passing over the router. I see
the wisdom of what you are saying with redesigning the network and I
will give it some thought, but the majority of the resources are
located in one spot. I will mull that over though. As it stands, only
some students doing fi
On 7/21/05, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
>
> why would you want to deal with suc
On 2005/07/21 15:32:37, Alexander Bochmann wrote:
> ...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > nc(1) doesn't work for the telnet cli on speedtouch ADSL routers,
> > though.
>
> That's probably because, quite unlike telnet(1),
> nc(1) isn't a telnet client (but
Hello all,
I've been playing around with database driven web stuff lately in the
chrooted apache. I've got a pretty simple CGI written in C that selects
all of my blog entries from a database and displays them in a web page.
I got things working running httpd with the -u flag and now i'm
attempti
Hi,
...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:50:20AM -0400, Bill Chmura wrote:
> Ethernet wise, currently the whole mess is at 100MB... It will be that
> way at least for 12 months after this. As far as heavily used, I just
> got on the scene myself and the usage is way down. School, summers
> off.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:49PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > #based on a solution posted by S.Marley
> >
> > echo -n ' kdm'; (sleep 5; /usr/local/bin/kdm ${kdm_flags}) &
> >
>
> Don't do that. Use /etc/ttys if thats the effect you want.
Any good reason not to? I posted the a soluti
For the sk(4) cards, if you buy the Linksys ones (only single seaters i
believe) you should make sure to get the rev.2 ones, as the rev.3 is realtek
based, you can tell on the retail box, it shows the little crab on the chip.
Happy hunting
- J
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Roger Neth Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:57:04 -0700
Went to the SGI O2 command monitor and input
>boot -f dksc(0,4,8)
What happens if you try
> boot -f dksc(0,4,8)/boot
On my system that loads the bootloader from from cdrom and then
continues to load the
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 17:44 schrieben Sie:
Hi,
Since you are using KDE, did you run genkdmconf to create the kdm
configuration files (eg. /usr/local/share/config/kdm/Xsession)?
HTH,
Stephan
> Folk,
>
> This one has me scratching my head:
>
> I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user
* Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 18:12]:
> I too looked for the sk cards, but there is no Quad for them. I was
> hoping to reduce interrupts by using Quad cards...
wrong assumption.
quad card does as many ints as 4 one port cards with the same type of
chip.
> If I went with
> sever
> I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user and have a stock X working.
> I can type "startx" once I'm logged in and have kde up, but with no
> mouse functionality.
? Not sure about that one, if your mouse works in kdm.
> The relevant section of /etc/rc.local reads thus:
> #based on a solution
After getting some much needed sleep I realized the key things I left
out of the last post.
Ethernet wise, currently the whole mess is at 100MB... It will be that
way at least for 12 months after this. As far as heavily used, I just
got on the scene myself and the usage is way down. School, s
Folk,
This one has me scratching my head:
I can boot into kdm, login as a regular user and have a stock X working.
I can type "startx" once I'm logged in and have kde up, but with no
mouse functionality.
The relevant section of /etc/rc.local reads thus:
#based on a solution posted by S.Marley
On 7/19/05, Gary Clemans-Gibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot about the /dev/null idea. interesting result. I scp'd a 10 Mb
> file from my gentoo box and it completed fast in a few seconds - speed
> 3.3 Mb/s. Not great but faster than the other experiences.
>
> I then did the same with a 2.5
Another option is to do something like:
STATE_LIMIT="(source-track rule, max-src-nodes 75, max-src-states 3)"
...
$NET0_IN inet proto tcp from any to $RAS port ssh flags $tcpInit \
keep state $STATE_LIMIT
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 12:16 AM +0200 7/19/05, Romain GAILLEGUE wrote:
Today
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:11 +0200, Bjvrn Sjvberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> > Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings,
> or
> > even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or
> connecti
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:11:50PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 18:01 +0200, Bruno Rohee wrote:
> > > Thus breaking a behaviour that people have been used too for about the
> > > last 30 years.
> >
> > Telnet was used for most
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 23:50, Brian wrote:
> I spent the last three days reading through all the archives.
> And I have no clue what I am doing wrong. I only started down
> this road because of some of the other posters. I figured I
> would give assembly a shot.
>
Brian, its always good idea
Hey,
Status report on the What the Hack event that takes place next week
in Netherlands: http://eurobsd.org/2005-WhatTheHack/
just a heads up, I visited the event grounds yesterday to drop off the
first load of drinks:
http://eurobsd.org/2005-WhatTheHack/images/tn/DSC03762.JPG.html
The buildup
...on Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:18:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> nc(1) doesn't work for the telnet cli on speedtouch ADSL routers,
> though.
That's probably because, quite unlike telnet(1),
nc(1) isn't a telnet client (but you can use nc -t,
if you absolutely want to).
Alex.
OpenBSD developer survey.
Sorry for using this mailing list but we are a team of researchers from the
ENST (the engineering school of telecommunication of Paris), and we are
doing a sociological survey on OpenBSD in order to better understand the
community.
After a qualitative study and sev
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> telnet is still a wonderful tool that I use all the time.
>
> $ telnet hostname 25
>
> $ telnet hostname 80
>
> $ telnet hostname 22
>
> It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings, or
> even a manual sess
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> > Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> > you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
>
> why would you want to dea
--On 21 July 2005 14:11 +0200, BjC6rn SjC6berg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings,
or even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or
connection negotiation.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:32:45PM -0700, Tim Hammerquist wrote:
> Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> It's great for testing basic service availability, version strings, or
> even a manual session without a lot of process overhead or connection
> negotiation.
I've also been using telnet to do that kind of jo
* Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-21 09:21]:
> Alternately, if you really do need router throughput at or above 1000Mbps,
> you might want to consider a purpose-built gigabit router from Cisco :)
why would you want to deal with such crap? geez.
> > I was contemplating a
> > Quad gigabit card a
During system boot, I see this:
Jul 21 10:52:05 tekkaman /bsd: cd0(atapiscsi0:0:0): Check Condition
(error 0x70) on opcode 0x0
Jul 21 10:52:06 tekkaman /bsd: SENSE KEY: Not Ready
Jul 21 10:52:06 tekkaman /bsd: ASC/ASCQ: Medium Not Present
Is it normal? Why the kernel should complain abou
:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:34:05 -0400
stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to build the gkrellm port in 3.7, and it fails at the link
> stage looking for libCrender.so.3.1. Where should this be co
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote:
>
> Never mind that the way that code does syscalls is unsupported even on
> i386. Never mind that the calling conventions on amd64 are different.
> Never mind that you're using 32-bit pointers on a 64-bit architecture.
> Never mind
Thank you all for help
There were 2 problems in my config:
1. viq was right about php, it had to connect to /var/run/mysql/mysql.sock,
not to /var/www/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock
2. chaton was right about the soft link
So now everything works fine :) Thanks you once again.
BTW Edd, I liked your tri
I'm trying to build the gkrellm port in 3.7, and it fails at the link stage
looking for libCrender.so.3.1. Where should this be coming from?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
On 21/07/05, chaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:35:38 +0300
> "Tomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hallo everyone,
> >
> > I've setup a web server with OpenBSD 3.7, default install Apache, PHP 5.0.3
> > and MySQL 4.0.23. When I connect from other hosts to mysql, everyth
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw that ports has ettercap and sniffit but I didn' get around to
testing them to see if they will do the job I need. Can anyone recommend
other tools that will do the work?
As mentioned, use the -s option in tcpdump. There's also a tool
called t
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I spent the last three days reading through all the archives.
> And I have no clue what I am doing wrong. I only started down
> this road because of some of the other posters. I figured I
> would give assembly a shot.
Why? Do you like pain?
> I read Assembly
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:35:38 +0300
"Tomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo everyone,
>
> I've setup a web server with OpenBSD 3.7, default install Apache, PHP 5.0.3
> and MySQL 4.0.23. When I connect from other hosts to mysql, everything works
> fine, and then I try to connect to mysql local c
> Hai,
>
> Running OBSD 3.6 and started to get this message :
>
> MCLPOOL LIMIT REACHED, INCREASE KERN.MAXCLUSTERS
>
> Eeeuh sure, but how and why and with how much ?
>
> I googled on this message but getting mostly unreadable sites (japanese or
> something)
> And nobody seems to explain why th
On Thursday 21 of July 2005 09:35, Tomas wrote:
> [error] PHP Warning: mysql_connect() [ href='function.mysql-connect'>function.mysql-connect]: Can't connect to
> local MySQL server through socket '/var/www/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock' (2)
>
Shouldn't it be trying to connect to /var/run/mysql/mysq
Hallo everyone,
I've setup a web server with OpenBSD 3.7, default install Apache, PHP 5.0.3
and MySQL 4.0.23. When I connect from other hosts to mysql, everything works
fine, and then I try to connect to mysql local console, it works too. I know
that apache is chrooted so my rc.local looks like th
--> Error description:
Error-For: K12NEWSLETTERS@LISTSERV.CLASSROOM.COM
Error-Code: 3
Error-Text: No such list.
Error-End: One error reported.
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> Bruno Rohee wrote:
> > Thus breaking a behaviour that people have been used too for about
> > the last 30 years.
>
> Telnet was used for most of the last 30 years, too.
telnet is still a wonderful tool that I use all the time.
$ telnet hostname 25
$ telnet hostname 80
$
On 7/21/05, Bill Chmura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We finally got some money to build a router for the center of a 200-300
> user network. Upon arrival I found it to be one giant segment with old
> old switches (sort of - not real ones) and terrible sprawl.
>
> I need to build a router that wil
66 matches
Mail list logo
