On 11/27/05, Alexander Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if this could cause a lot of other errors, like
corrupted files and such. I am thinking about if I dare to mount and use
msdos filesystems r/w again... But then again, if noone dares to do it,
we'll never know if it works as
In all these:
I'm going to take this thread for what I think it is... the old guard
telling us youngin's that our efforts are appreciated, but we've got a
bit more to learn about how things work, and how to write good
documentation, before we're really ready to jump into these things the
way we
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 01:58:04 +0100, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:34:39AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said that
Yes, OpenBSD is the _only_ operating system that takes security as
seriously as it should be taken. Consider the why of OpenBSD's
this is a
On 11/27/05, J Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:16:27AM -0600, the unit calling itself Matthew
Weigel wrote:
snip
You should probably look to
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=popa3d first.
Yep - I looked at it first... but IIRC it doesn't support POP
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
In all these:
I'm going to take this thread for what I think it is... the old guard
telling us youngin's that our efforts are appreciated, but we've got a
bit more to learn about how things work, and how to write good
documentation, before we're really ready to jump
Am Sonntag, 27. November 2005 00:47 schrieben Sie:
Hi Kevin,
I'm in the market for a *tower-type* server box (or m/b to put in a
tower) on which to run OBSD and a very important criteria for me is this
one. I'd also like at least two cpu sockets and more PCI slots than
average but that's
Roger, Kevin List:
I think...I'll take your advise. Seems that all OS users are addicted to
their own and in Linux which I use...such a query as this is an
invitation to a disro war. In my search of course your replies, the
community at BSD is much more containedthough I do not say that
On 15:57 Sun 27 Nov, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Now, some quick question...which BSD flavour to try first...thrust is on
easy to install learn for a newbie.
Try FreeBSD first. Than the others...
Second, which would be more suited to a production web/mail server with
djbdns, apache, php, perl
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:50:37 +, Stuart Henderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fwiw, I didn't have any trouble with my cerc-ata on 3.8-release (now
running a snap from a couple of weeks ago), it looks like Dell has BIOS
and firmware newer than that on LSI's website,
http://tinyurl.com/cpmjn,
On 11/27/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- cut -
My grasp of 80960 (i960) assembler and op codes is not adequate to do
anything realistic in the way of really analyzing the binaries in a
reasonable length of time.
None the less, I'm still half tempted to just go for it and see
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:31:54 +0100, David Coppa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 11/27/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- cut -
My grasp of 80960 (i960) assembler and op codes is not adequate to do
anything realistic in the way of really analyzing the binaries in a
reasonable length of
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:39:18PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:29:27AM +0100, Jonathan Glaschke said that
The Web is against good design. You can see this by looking at the most
people's choice of browser. Bad web browsers are the biggest problem in
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:15:27PM +0100, Jonathan Glaschke said that
XHTML 1.1 must be shipped as application/xhtml+xml. IE can't handle this
and ask the user (or the idiot, as you signature says ;) where to save this
file. That's not a real problem since you can use xhtml 1.0 but that
On 14:55 Sun 27 Nov, frantisek holop wrote:
your page is unreadable at 800x600
:)
I know, it's personal site (well, just splash at this moment), and I
decided for 1024x768.
But I was talking about *code*. Offcourse that I would design OpenBSD
site totaly different... It's about code
On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Sime Ramov wrote:
On 14:55 Sun 27 Nov, frantisek holop wrote:
your page is unreadable at 800x600
:)
I know, it's personal site (well, just splash at this moment), and I
decided for 1024x768.
But I was talking about *code*. Offcourse that I would design OpenBSD
Sime Ramov hello at coastaldisturbance.com writes:
I agree. Just look at the code of my site, now, OpenBSD needs exactly
that! :) No, I'm not sarcastic, I'm serious, it would match OpenBSD
perfectly.
Can you people please shut the fuck up about the website. It's been
stated numerous times
On 14:46 Sun 27 Nov, Simon Morgan wrote:
time soon. I have a sneaking suspicion that the only people who
keep raising this are i know what's best HTML programmers who
have nothing interesting or worthwhile to contribute or discuss but
feel the overwhelming need to nitpick, bitch and moan
Oops my problem were caused by
antispoof quick for lo
On 11/26/05, Alexander Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.benzedrine.cx/transquid.html
together with any kind of a redirect_program?
I've tried first using adzapper.sf.net and then just a hello world
redirector from
Sime Ramov hello at coastaldisturbance.com writes:
Many programmers write code and think that it's the only thing that
matters. Well, web site of the product is also very important.
Matters to who? Idiots who can't read man pages and are constantly
polluting this mailing list with their idiotic
css can be used with 4.01 w/o problems. and making pages
that have css but also set things for non-css browsers (background)
is quite normal (at least until everybody catches up in year 3014).
make it at least 1998 ;-)
OpenBSD is known for it's progressive additude, if there's a new and a
Hello!
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 03:04:11PM +0100, Sime Ramov wrote:
On 14:55 Sun 27 Nov, frantisek holop wrote:
your page is unreadable at 800x600
:)
I know, it's personal site (well, just splash at this moment), and I
decided for 1024x768.
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* design.
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-26 08:57]:
I was asking myself if I would actually benefit from a dual core
processor, or multi-processor system in a routing setup and more I think
about it, I would think not as the application is not multi-treads to
start with and there isn't
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 03:04:11PM +0100, Sime Ramov wrote:
On 14:55 Sun 27 Nov, frantisek holop wrote:
your page is unreadable at 800x600
I know, it's personal site (well, just splash at this moment), and I
decided for 1024x768.
Deciding for *any* resolution is
27 Nov, 2005
Dear Sir,
I've installed OpenBSD on an Intel machine(Intel chipset GV) in a logical
partition. How can I boot that partition from a bootable floppy i.e what
should I type at the boot
Hello everyone.
I wanted to build an email server OBSD style. I have never done this,
and it has been a while since I set one up (few years). I wanted to
take advantage of many of the newer developments in the *nix email world.
I am using OBSD 3.8 with sendmail. My machine is an 800mhz via c3
On 11/27/05, Bruno S. Delbono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a secure php CMS that any of you might have had experience with
(knowing full well that php and security are an oxymoron)
Did you try SPIP (http://www.spip.net) ? Several big french websites use it.
Fabien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD claims to be done for the benefit of its developers and every
indication that I've seen says that they mean exactly what they say.
True and nothing wrong with that.
Concerns of users are secondary at best.
The developers will help you if you have something
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:14:50AM -0800, PARAMVIR DHINDSA wrote:
27 Nov, 2005
Dear Sir,
I've installed OpenBSD on an Intel machine(Intel chipset GV) in a logical
partition. How can I boot that
Alejandro Valverde Molina wrote:
I'm using pf to forwarding my dmz, but I need to forward a http subdomain to a
specific ip address, so is there a way to forward the package reading the http
url, like m$cr$s$ft isa server does?
In your httpd.conf file, you can make that do what ever you
On 11/27/05, Alejandro Valverde Molina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using pf to forwarding my dmz, but I need to forward a http subdomain
to a
specific ip address, so is there a way to forward the package reading the http
url, like m$cr$s$ft isa server does?
I don't know exactly what you
Rene Rivera wrote:
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
...
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* design.
The current openbsd.org doesn't work at 640x480... Does that make it a
bad design? And hence should be considered a bug to be fixed by a new
design?
One of our star platforms, Zaurus, has only
On 27/11/05, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 19:08, steven mestdagh wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 05:45:37PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
I finally need to activate Java support for Konqueror,
but it appears that Java is not by default part of KDE
or
Nick Holland wrote:
Rene Rivera wrote:
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* design.
The current openbsd.org doesn't work at 640x480... Does that make it a
bad design? And hence should be considered a bug to be fixed by a new
design?
So, where do you see a
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 01:41:01AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
...You should be aware that the 1.5 jdk has no java plugin! Use 1.4 if you
need it.
True for -release and -stable. But the plugin was added to -current cvs 4
days ago.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/devel/jdk/1.5/
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +, Simon Morgan said that
Sime Ramov hello at coastaldisturbance.com writes:
Many programmers write code and think that it's the only thing that
matters. Well, web site of the product is also very important.
Matters to who? Idiots who can't read
hmm, on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 05:34:49PM -0500, Nick Holland said that
Rene Rivera wrote:
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
...
Deciding for *any* resolution is *bad* design.
The current openbsd.org doesn't work at 640x480... Does that make it a
bad design? And hence should be considered a bug
snip
your only workaround is to not send any capability it does not grok.
this is guesswork. you might want to try to not announce v4 unicast
capabilities...
snip
I was wondering exactly how this was specified in the bgpd.conf file?
Since I was trying to do the same thing to connect to he.net and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 4:20 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
snip
You're not contributing anything.
if you are sent away right at the beginning, what's the point?
expressing an opinion is still a contribution. without that,
openbsd would be much
Hi there,
Iam looking for a script which could used for an remote OpenBSD 3.8
installtion on a dedicated server. Last time Ive dumped an image of 3.6
on my box but Ive read something about an installation routine for
OpenBSD 3.6 but I have forgotten the scriptname (but it wasnt the
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:15:26 +0100, Robbert Haarman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear JCR,
To the rest of list users; Please pardon another long email from me on
this. Helping reasonable people like Robbert understand why many people
consider HOWTO's to be harmful is hopefully worth the added
On 11/27/05, Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hackers like interesting problems. Pretty HTML and a nice website
layout is not an interesting problem. Stop wasting peoples time
with it. The website has its purpose and does a perfectly good
job of serving it.
I would have to disagree. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Jeremy David wrote:
On 11/27/05, Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hackers like interesting problems. Pretty HTML and a nice website
layout is not an interesting problem. Stop wasting peoples time
with it. The
frantisek holop wrote:
dear list,
before Theo brings up the (very) valid point of haven't
been able to see any proposed design (even if rejected
without looking) i would like to ask fellow designers
or anyone who feels like to make an openbsd site design
proposal just to show that actually
Hi there,
Iam looking for a script which could used for an remote OpenBSD 3.8
installation on a dedicated server. Last time Ive dumped an image of 3.6
on my box but Ive read something about an installation routine for
OpenBSD 3.6 but I have forgotten the scriptname (but it wasnt the
... both for cd37 and cd38 in a similar way.
For 3.8 is says:
CD-ROM: AC
Loading /3.8/I386/CDBOOT
probing: pc0 com0 apm mem[635k 382M a20=on]
disk: fd0 hd0+* cd0
OpenBSD /i386 CDBOOT 1.04
boot
booting cd0a: /3.8/i386/bsd.rd: 4369156+828044
[52+151072+137381]=0x53b600
entry point at 0x100120
Why don't you cut the guy some slack - or at least shut your yap on this
(puh-l-e-e-e-ze)? I don't see *any* of what you're claiming to be
OpenBSD policy stated on the website. In fact I see a statement
(somewhat) to the contrary:
Be as politics-free as possible; solutions should be decided on
On Monday 28 November 2005 01:33, J Moore wrote:
Why don't you cut the guy some slack - or at least shut your yap on this
(puh-l-e-e-e-ze)? I don't see *any* of what you're claiming to be
OpenBSD policy stated on the website. In fact I see a statement
(somewhat) to the contrary:
Be as
47 matches
Mail list logo
