Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> on my quest to promote OpenBSD I found a new user today, but we ran into
> some issues concerning wpi.
> The laptop is a "Dell Inspirion 6400".
>
I have a similar Dell Inspiron 8600 currently running 4.0 I too have had
a difficult time with the built
Cory Albrecht wrote:
Marc Balmer wrote:
Cory Albrecht wrote:
I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
On a side note, you are aware that you must create the accounts
locally as well for things to work pro
Running 2.2 on -current (19 Feb) with no issues. Will let you know if
I come up against any issues
On 2/21/07, Robert Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I would like to ask everyone who uses OpenOffice.Org to test the new 2.2m8
packages. Version 2.2 is going to be released on the 27th of F
I just wanted to ask this question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] My situation is
100Mbps/100Mbps that is needed to be managed. I need bandwidth
management and I want to ask if someone has such experience. I plan to
implement it on OpenBSD. Any recommendations?
Shohrukh
Alex Thurlow wrote:
So anywhere
On 2/21/07, Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Greg,
Greg Thomas wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:16:35PM -0800:
> This has been bugging me for a couple of days, and I can't figure out
> if I'm missing something or the fstab (or another) man page is.
As fstab(5) does not explain any o
On 2/21/07, Ryan Corder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does anyone know why GSSAPI authentication has been disabled on the port
of msmtp in 4.0?
Might be a good question for ports@ and (if not ports@) the maintainer.
DS
Hi Greg,
Greg Thomas wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:16:35PM -0800:
> This has been bugging me for a couple of days, and I can't figure out
> if I'm missing something or the fstab (or another) man page is.
As fstab(5) does not explain any options except the generic ones
rw ro sw xx
does anyone know why GSSAPI authentication has been disabled on the port
of msmtp in 4.0?
thanks.
ryanc
--
Ryan Corder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Systems Engineer, NovaSys Health LLC.
501-219- ext. 646
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signat
On 2/21/07, smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:56:50 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote
> IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
> Consider limiting the size of attachments that go through your email
> gateway; SMTP isn't an efficient protocol for bulk
Cory Albrecht wrote:
So, you're saying that if I had an organization with 100 OpenBSD
desktops (and associated typical file /print/etc servers), that I would
have to create every new login on *each* of those 100 desktops in
addition adding it to the LDAP server every time we got a new employee?
On 21 Feb 2007, at 23:41, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Alex Thurlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 00:25]:
I have 2 GigE lines from different providers balanced via BGP with
full
routes from both providers. Currently, these are running through a
Linux/Quagga/Iptables router/firewall with a P4 3.
This has been bugging me for a couple of days, and I can't figure out
if I'm missing something or the fstab (or another) man page is.
From the example in the fstab man page:
server:/export/ports /usr/ports nfs rw,nodev,nosuid,tcp,soft,intr 0 0
Many of the options in the fourth field are expla
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 02:19:58PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 19:01, Nick Holland wrote:
> > J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > > FAQ 4.9
> > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SendDmesg
> > > "NOTE - Please send only GENERIC kernel dmesgs. Custom kernels that
> > > have devi
On 2007/02/21 18:38, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> problem is really I can't replace Cisco DS3 and multi channel DS3 with
> OpenBSD yet for the lack of decent hardware for that! (;<
eotdm may be worth a look where you have both ends of the line.
some vendors mentioned here:
http://marc.10east.com/?l=c
On 2007/02/21 23:44, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> After uping wpi0 the machine completely freezes for a couple of seconds,
> then accepts input every couple of seconds. There is no unusual
> interrupt load coming from wpi.
> The "funny" thing: If there is traffic on the ethernet (bce) the machine
> b
Oops, forgot that part. At 325Mbps, we do about 60,000pps, so that puts
us at about 360,000pps needed for 2Gbps.
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Alex Thurlow wrote:
We're pushing streaming video, so it's almost all outbound traffic by
about a 30:1 factor, and our average packet size is quite large -
a
Alex Thurlow wrote:
We're pushing streaming video, so it's almost all outbound traffic by
about a 30:1 factor, and our average packet size is quite large - around
1200 bytes. At the moment, when we hit about 350Mbps, the router gets
to ~30% CPU usage, and it appears that we stop being able to
* Alex Thurlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 00:25]:
> I have 2 GigE lines from different providers balanced via BGP with full
> routes from both providers. Currently, these are running through a
> Linux/Quagga/Iptables router/firewall with a P4 3.2 GHz. The distro is
> Gentoo, and we've str
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:56:50 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote
> IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
> Consider limiting the size of attachments that go through your email
> gateway; SMTP isn't an efficient protocol for bulk file transfers,
> and like you've found out y
> I figure there's some kind of automatic processing that is done on the
> dmesg's so I'm wondering if there are any "rules" or preferences on
> email line wrap settings?
>
> Also, can attachments be processed?
When people use attachments in their dmesg mails, it is a total
pain in the ass for
So anywhere I look for router performance on OpenBSD, all the benchmarks
are on small lines or old machines. I also see mentions of people using
it in large scale installations, which is what I'm looking to do. I
thought I'd ask here and see what people have done.
I have 2 GigE lines from di
Hi,
several topics have been discussed.
Mail is a company topic, even none IT associates don't
mind how it works and just want to send/receive mail.
For my part, saleforces ("profit center") have been
sensitive to large mails when their client messaging
system refused their "heavy mails" (more t
Hello misc@,
on my quest to promote OpenBSD I found a new user today, but we ran into
some issues concerning wpi.
The laptop is a "Dell Inspirion 6400".
With GENERIC[.MP]:
After uping wpi0 the machine completely freezes for a couple of seconds,
then accepts input every couple of seconds. There is
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 19:01, Nick Holland wrote:
> J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > FAQ 4.9
> > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SendDmesg
> > "NOTE - Please send only GENERIC kernel dmesgs. Custom kernels that
> > have device drivers removed are not helpful."
> >
> > On systems where one can run
Yep, that's the attitude. A few jobs ago I worked for a small to
medium sized company that was getting by with an IT manager and
me as the assistant. When I put in my 2 wks notice the owner
decided that I never did anything and he wasn't replacing me. The
IT manager put his 2 wks notice in the
Marc Balmer wrote:
Cory Albrecht wrote:
I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
On a side note, you are aware that you must create the accounts
locally as well for things to work properly? It is not enou
Hi,
On Wed, 21.02.2007 at 14:26:00 -0600, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bigger question is - how does the BOSS know there was a 30 second
> delay in incoming email due to virus scanning?
the BOSS probably doesn't know that the delay is owed to the virus
scanning, but I've experie
On 2007/02/21 11:39, stuartv wrote:
> I have FINALLY been allowed to schedule time to replace the
> aging mail server. Currently, it is running OpenBSD 3.7,
> with sendmail, smtp-vilter, and clamav. This is our internal
> mail server and it uses fetchmail to get our email off of
> the public se
Darren Spruell wrote:
The 'man -M' method gives you good flexibility for choosing what page.
Not to mention doing something like 'man -a spamd'.
On 2/21/07, Tim Pushor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Darren,
Just want to say thank you. You helped solve a problem thats been
hounding me for a while now.
Cool. ;) Being right once in 10 tries isn't too bad...
Now I just have to figure out why Path MTU discovery isn't working, but
thats min
Hi
I would like to ask everyone who uses OpenOffice.Org to test the new 2.2m8
packages. Version 2.2 is going to be released on the 27th of February and I
plan to include this version in OpenBSD 4.1.
Their tree has been frozen since January, so the update is safe; however,
I still need people to te
On 2/21/07, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Darren et al,
>
> > IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
>
> He could ask the boss for 'more' hardware. Most problems tend to go away
> when thrown adequate amounts of money at them, and timeouts because of
> s
On 2/21/07, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Darren et al,
> IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
He could ask the boss for 'more' hardware. Most problems tend to go away
when thrown adequate amounts of money at them, and timeouts because of
scanning an
Hi,
On Wed, 21.02.2007 at 20:42:13 +0100, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're dead right. In day to day business, I've found that most people
> have no clue how to transfer files from one place to the other, other than
> through mail.
you probably *could* make them use WebDAV if their
I agree, I'm looking for a technical solution to a much bigger
problem. Unfortuneatly, you can't fix stupid. I often have to
deal with people who can barely attach a file to an email,
asking them to check what size that file is or to send it using
another method is out of the question (imagine h
Hey Darren et al,
> IMHO you're trying to find a technical solution to a bigger problem.
He could ask the boss for 'more' hardware. Most problems tend to go away
when thrown adequate amounts of money at them, and timeouts because of
scanning and filtering is probably one of those types of problem
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> TTFR, but you missed the point I was making - LDAP is seldom used for
> *machine authentication*, rather it is designed for applications like
> email, file sharing, et al.
>
> Per your comment, it appears that the discontinuity lies with *local
> logins*
Hi Darren,
Just want to say thank you. You helped solve a problem thats been
hounding me for a while now. It was in fact the smartdefence, but it was
the number of fragmented packets allowed in a certain timespan.
The problem was that I don't have access to the device and thus had to
trouble
On 2/21/07, stuartv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
spamassassin. Lately, we have been receiving emails with
larger and larger attachments which has been causing the
clamav to take to long scanning them and thus a time-out and
again, no more email until I get it straitened out.
So now to my question
VIERNES & SABADOS
V A L D E S
Organizacion gral:
EMANES Producciones
www.emanesproducciones.com.ar
Cumpleaqos
Bar de Eventos Privados y Semi-Privados
Reuniones
Despedidas
P a l e r m o ... H o l l y w o o d
Cenas
Con tres sectores bien diferenciados, es una estructura de 3 pisos, nos
da un
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:07:45PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >In fact, there are spammers who ARE noticing that greylisting servers
> >look (or behave) different, and they are disconnecting and not sending
> >spam through them. Thus, no spam is delivered.
>
> i have
I am trying to set up failover default routes. The situation is three
OpenBSD machines, client, rtr0 and rtr1. Client has two interfaces, one
with a crossover link to rtr0 and one to rtr1. I would like the default
route for client to be rtr0 unless rtr0 has failed in some way
(unreachable, etc). As
Hello Stuart,
On Wed, 21.02.2007 at 11:39:14 -0500, stuartv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now to my question. What software works really well for
> an internal mail server? I would like some spam protection
> and I NEED Anti-virus, and I need it all to work even when
> a customer sends an emai
> on OpenBSD, for things like samba servers or user logins to the
> machine, the account must be created locally as well as in the LDAP
> database. at least this is the current state of affairs.
>
>
trivia:
This contrasts to e.g. the linux/solaris situation where a nss (Name Service
Switch) modu
On 2/21/07, stuartv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now to my question. What software works really well for
> an internal mail server? I would like some spam protection
> and I NEED Anti-virus, and I need it all to work even when
> a customer sends an email with a 50M file attachment because
> t
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:22, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> Personally, I'm having trouble using login-ldap with my local(host)
> LDAP server using SSL. It refuses to connect and I can't find where
> the problem lies. But since the two run on the same server, I manage
> to live with unsecured con
At 05:22 PM 2/21/2007 +0100, Rogier Krieger wrote:
On 2/21/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PMFJI, but could you clarify that? Requiring local accounts totally
defeats the purpose of an LDAP server.
Yes, it does. In fact, it is clearly documented in the login-ldap port
materials.
I have FINALLY been allowed to schedule time to replace the
aging mail server. Currently, it is running OpenBSD 3.7,
with sendmail, smtp-vilter, and clamav. This is our internal
mail server and it uses fetchmail to get our email off of
the public server and sends our email out using a smart rel
On 2/21/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PMFJI, but could you clarify that? Requiring local accounts totally
defeats the purpose of an LDAP server.
Yes, it does. In fact, it is clearly documented in the login-ldap port
materials.
You may get around said local accounts requirement i
L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
Cory Albrecht wrote:
I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
On a side note, you are aware that you must create the accounts
locally as well f
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 08:01:19PM -0700, Open Phugu wrote:
> On 2/20/07, Bray Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I ran an nmap -sS localhost which output
> >
> >port state service
> >13/tcp open daytime
> >22/tcp open ssh
> >25/tcp open smtp
> >37/
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Cory Albrecht wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
> > accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
>
> On a side note, you are aware that you must create the accounts
> locally as well for things
I presume you are aware that a) -current has this patch in its PHP port,
and b) 4.0 (at least) has a -hardened flavour which, while it uses
another patch, is pretty comparable?
Yes. 5.1.6 is in -CURRENT ports and uses Suhosin, but this is still a couple
of versions behind. Under normal circumst
Toni Mueller schrieb:
Hi,
On Wed, 07.02.2007 at 19:08:46 +0100, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had the same problem with botnets, attacking a specific URL. Even
sending out 404 errors didn't help at all.
I wouldn't recommend the pf overload feature, as this depends on the
number o
>i was wondering if it was possible to use known_hosts for some kind
>of "local alias" database.
That's what ~/.ssh/config file is for, for example:
--
Host box
HostName 111.222.333.444
Host box2
HostName some.domain.name
--
p.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominik Zalewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:14 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Realtime traffic watch per IP
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using OpenBSD 4.0 as my main firewall in our company.
> What is the best way
> to see in r
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:49:20PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
>i was wondering if it was possible to use known_hosts for some kind
>of "local alias" database.
Why not use ssh_config?
Host aliasname
HostName real_name_or_ip
hmm, on Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 03:49:20PM +0100, frantisek holop said that
> hi there,
>
> i was wondering if it was possible to use known_hosts for some kind
> of "local alias" database.
all right, i see now that this is possible using
~/.ssh/config:
Host box
HostName aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
so
Hi all,
I have had considerable troubles installing 4.0 on the G4 version of the
HP ML110.
In short the message axe0: read PHY failed flooded the screen and the
system became unresponsive.
In my case boot -c whether on the main console or serial console sat
unresponsive at the ukc prompt.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/21 11:05, John Huss wrote:
Or do I have to create a new config file (man page seems to point at
/etc/ipsec.conf) in a new format?
In case you're interested in the relationship between these:
ipsecctl translates ipsec.conf into isakmpd.conf format an
hi there,
i was wondering if it was possible to use known_hosts for some kind
of "local alias" database.
e.g. i have only an ip. it would be nice imho if i could add
a symbolic name:
before:
aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd ssh-rsa B3NzaC1yc2EBvI snip snip snip
after:
box,aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd ssh-rsa
On 2007/02/21 11:05, John Huss wrote:
> Or do I have to create a new config file (man page seems to point at
> /etc/ipsec.conf) in a new format?
In case you're interested in the relationship between these:
ipsecctl translates ipsec.conf into isakmpd.conf format and feeds it
to isakmpd over a fi
Hello all,
Previously I had a pair of Openbsd 3.9 boxes doing ipsec between each
other quite happily. One of these boxes has been replaced with Openbsd
4.0 and I have to get the ipsec working again.
Previously I was using /etc/isakmpd/isakmpd.conf and the ipsecadm
command. In 4.0 I've been
*ahem* Seems to be working now with the isakmpd command. Sorry about
using the wrong command. Still a bit lost so will read up some more.
Glad it seems to be working. Thanks again for your time.
Cheers,
Johnny
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 09:39:56AM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> I'll send a new dmesg and notify if anything has changed when I get
> back.
Got back, it was the graphics card not the mobo, but I did ask him to
test my NIC too and he said it ran just fine (of course I asked for a
specific duplex tes
Hello,
I have a strange problem: A machine I have to tend locks up once or
twice a day.
The situation:
LAN --- box1 (OpenBSD 4.0-stable)
| |
| |
| |
pppoe0 pppoe1
1.2.3.41.2.3.5
--- The Intern
Hi All,
I'm using OpenBSD 4.0 as my main firewall in our company. What is the best way
to see in realtime which IP address is taking bandwidth?
Anyone knows howto do a SVG realtime graph like they did in pfSense?
Thank you in advance,
Dominik
On 2/21/07, Craig Barraclough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Running inside VMware ESX2.5.1, kernel from 16FEB, I was just getting
ready to gather info on why the box was crashing with vic(4) enabled,
and this crash happened.
vic(4) apparently has issues. It crashes on VMware Server 1.01 running
L
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:35:46PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Can anyone suggest clues as to a reasonably successful way to handle
> receiving an IX /24 over both OSPF and BGP?
>
> If ospfd has to be restarted and bgpd gets to install the /24 before
> the new ospfd, the nexthops within that
Cory Albrecht wrote:
I'm trying to get my OpenBSD firewall to authenticate normal user
accounts off of an LDAP server running on a different machine.
On a side note, you are aware that you must create the accounts
locally as well for things to work properly? It is not enough
to have the accou
Woodchuck wrote:
As a work-around, you can name the spamassassin spamd's man pages something
else, say Spamd.
I don't know if there is an easy solution for this (I don't want to call
it a problem), but I think this shouldn't happen.
This is probably a matter for the spamassassin port maintai
Woodchuck wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Mike Erdely wrote:
Guido Tschakert wrote:
The first and the last entry are both spamd (8), but spamassassin from
ports has overwritten /usr/local/man/man8/spamd.8 from the system (which
I am looking for)
The man page for OpenBSD's spamd is not in /usr/loc
72 matches
Mail list logo
