WRAP board IIC port

I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board. Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624. Here is dmesg line: DS1621: iic1: addr 0x48 22=0a 40=0a 41=0f 42=0a 43=0a 44=0a 45=0a 46=0a 47=0a 48=0c 49=10 4a=c4 4b=01 4c=0e 4d=00 4e=d6 4f=00 51=0f a1=0f a2=0a a8=0c

Re: WRAP board IIC port

On 2007/06/30 10:46, Leon KomloE!i wrote: > I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board. > Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624. There's _some_ success since the devices are seen... > Here is dmesg line: > DS1624 > iic1: addr 0x48 a2=da a3=eb a4=30 a5=6e

Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

I have a server that runs OpenBSD 4.1, and a laptop running Windows. I want to use Thunderbird on the laptop to send mail via the server. The laptop connects from many different networks. I would like to use port 587, since some isps blocks port 25. I want to use my username/password to authentica

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

On 2007/06/30 12:46, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > Googling gives a lot of references to SASL. Do I really have to go > down that road to do something as simple as this? for smtp auth, yes. but for a simple use like this, why not just ssh-tunnel instead?

Re: WRAP board IIC port

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:46:55AM +0200, Leon Komlo?i wrote: > I'm trying to connect various IC's to IIC port on WRAP.1E board. > Without any success. IC's are Dallas DS1621,DS1631,DS1624. > > > Here is dmesg line: > > DS1621: > iic1: addr 0x48 22=0a 40=0a 41=0f 42=0a 43=0a 44=0a 45=0a 46=0a 47

spamd -M race condition

Hello list, I've been bitten by a race condition in spamd. I've got a low-prio MX configured as an MX trap with spamd -M: bzero.se. 900 IN MX 10 mx.bzero.se. bzero.se. 900 IN MX 99 mxtrap.bzero.se. In the log below, a re-attempt at delivery

You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !

You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . http://www.emin3m09.uv.ro/postcard.gif.exe . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ and ente

Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?

> >>In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username > >>webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so > >>httpd can access/write to their dir as well. > >>Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas? > > > >You don't want the www user being able to write to y

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On 2007/06/30 12:46, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: >> Googling gives a lot of references to SASL. Do I really have to go >> down that road to do something as simple as this? > >for smtp auth, yes. OK. >but for a simple use like this, why not just >ssh-tu

Re: Intel xeon fails to boot with 4.1 release

On 6/29/07, Austin Hook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Trying to set up a fairly heavy duty web server I encountered boot problems with this fairly new machine using the release CD ROM. Using the -c command at the boot prompt I already see error messages, before it gives me the UKC> ... UVM_PAGE_PH

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: Relaying SMTP STARTTLS can allow relaying for remote SMTP clients which have successfully authenticated themselv

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > >> I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' > >You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: > >Relaying > > >SMTP STARTTLS can allow relaying for remote SMTP c

Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?

Brian Candler schreef: In their homedir there is a `ln -s` to their /var/www/home/username webspace. That webspace is chowned username:www and chmodded 770 so httpd can access/write to their dir as well. Is that advisable / workable? Other ideas? You don't want the www user being able t

Config problem of Intel 915GM

Hello! When I exit from the X, I got following warning message: I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BUSID PCI:02:0 in Section "Device" of xorg.conf, but it can't start the X, what is the problem and how to fix it? thanks!

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' > >You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: > Then I would need client certificates, wouldn't I? Yes. As you have

problem of Intel 915GM

Hello! When I exit from the X, I got following warning message: I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BusID PCI:0:2:1 in Section "Device" of xorg.conf, but it can't start the X, what is the problem and how to fix it? thanks!

ssh and sudo, password not hidden

Hi Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: Password:secret_in_echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ I don't see anything about this in the manpage so I think this not expected behavi

Re: ssh and sudo, password not hidden

On Saturday 30 June 2007 19:31, Tom Van Looy wrote: > Hi > > Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] > $ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: > Password:secret_in_echo > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] > $ > > I don't see

Re: ssh and sudo, password not hidden

Tom Van Looy wrote: Hi Today I used sudo as command to ssh and it echoed my sudo password. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ ssh soekris sudo pfctl -s state [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: Password:secret_in_echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ I don't see anything about this in the manpage so I think this not

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: >> Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> I get the dreaded 'Relaying denied. Proper authentication needed.' > >> >You don't need AUTH, STARTTLS is sufficient. See cf/README: > >> Then I would need c

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > I have a self-signed server cert that I created using commands that > I barely understand. I have no idea where to start. By reading the fine instructions :-) man starttls sendmail operations guide: doc/op/op.* > I guess I need a CA key, and CA cert

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > >> I have a self-signed server cert that I created using commands that >> I barely understand. I have no idea where to start. > >By reading the fine instructions :-) >man starttls I have read that, done that

Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:51:22PM +0200, Matt wrote: > >You don't want user 1's web applications to be able to access data in user > >2's web application storage space. > I will only be using mod_php. In the past, without the user shell > accounts, this has worked rather well for me in combinati

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > >man starttls > > I have read that, done that. Nothing about client certs there. sendmail doesn't care as long as it is a cert. > Anyway, you are the maintainer of the free version of sendmail? Yes. > Would you consider putting in LOGIN/PLAIN s

following stable, extra file sets?

Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone. I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through the "following stable" pro

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

If someone sends a good patch: yes (see the website for the correct address where to sent patches). Note that this isn't as simple as it might seem: the problem is where you store the passwords for PLAIN. You certainly don't want to reuse the existing system passwords. Put the authentication dat

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sat, Jun 30, 2007, Fredrik Staxeng wrote: > >> >man starttls >> >> I have read that, done that. Nothing about client certs there. > >sendmail doesn't care as long as it is a cert. Surely it has to be signed with some key trusted by the particular

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

Aaron wrote: Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone. I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went through the "followi

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

Well, that is exactly what I want to do. I use the system passwords for imap anyway, so why not? Of course, the channel must be protected by SSL/TLS when you do that. Because there are a large number of IMAP clients that are not aware of LOGINDISABLED, and which will blindly attempt LOGIN or AU

Re: problem of Intel 915GM

On 6/30/07, Alex Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello! When I exit from the X, I got following warning message: I810: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found This is just a warning. You can ignore it. I try to edit the BusID PCI:0:2:0 to BusID PCI:0:2:1 in Section "

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

James Hartley wrote: On 6/30/07, *Aaron* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound correct? The following link from the FAQ

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

On 6/30/07, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and > game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound > correct? The following link from the FAQ describes what the roles of each file set. Perhaps this will pro

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

Firas Kraiem wrote: Aaron wrote: Just a quick, hopefully easy, question for everyone. I just installed a new 4.1 system, took a look at my options for keeping it up to date and decided that 'stable' would be best for me. When i installed i chose bsd, base41, etc41, comp41 and man41. I went

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

On Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 15:13:31 -0500, Aaron wrote: >What i found strange is now it seems as if i have gained the misc41 and >game41 file sets as a result of following stable. Does this sound >correct? Yes, that's the way make build works. It compiles and installs everything in the sour

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

Maurice Janssen writes: > >Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of > >following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no > >use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as > >possible. > > I'm sure it's possible to modify the tr

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

Marco S Hyman wrote: Maurice Janssen writes: > >Is there anyway to _not_ get these extra sets as part of > >following stable? I don't know that it hurts anything, but I have no > >use for them on the system and would like to keep it as minimalistic as > >possible. > > I'm sure it's po

Intel 975X Express Chipset supported?

Is the Intel 975X Express Chipset supported by OpenBSD 4.1 ? Thank you, Juan Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

On 6/30/07, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am making an assumption here that people would want to update code when needed, and be supported, why even give th

Re: Intel 975X Express Chipset supported?

The 965 works fine for me. I use the pci-e slot with an 8x raid controller instead of a 16x video card. The CPU is the cheapest 512k cache celeron D that I could find, they are really fast and around $40-$50. Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is the Intel 975X Express Chipset supported by

Re: following stable, extra file sets?

David Higgs wrote: On 6/30/07, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok this has answered the question, and thanks.This raises another question for me.. If updating just the sets that you install, and I am making an assumption here that people would want to update code when needed, and be support

Re: [OT] Open Source OSS for OpenBSD?

On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:23 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > I have been throwing around a phrase for a few weeks. Perhaps it > should > be popularized. > > OpenBSD is free as in air. Unfortunately, Richard Stallman beat you to this one by about 24 years. He never popularized it, but this was one o

Re: Setting up a virtual hosting machine w. SSH/SFTP accounts - pitfalls/experiences?

I've found that most clients don't need or expect to login to a web server. The handful of people that do can be given their own dedicated server to use or something like that. For the rest, just give each domain name/user their own httpd instance running with its own config, its own unix user, an

Re: Relaying denied. Trying to do TLS+SMTP AUTH. Do I really need SASL?

>From: Fredrik Staxeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I have a server that runs OpenBSD 4.1, and a laptop running >Windows. I want >to use Thunderbird on the laptop to send mail via the server. The >laptop >connects from many different networks. > >I would like to use port 587, since some isps blocks port

ftp-proxy binat design -- Was: Re: binat questions

On 03/22/2007 03:17:00 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: One thing to watch out for with binat: you can't use it with ftp-proxy(8), since binat is of higher priority than the rdr or nat rules which are added to the anchor. The workaround there is to list nat and rdr separately. I just figured this o