aml parse error

2011-02-01 Thread karthic kumaran
[Sorry posted this to tech, found out that questions are meant for misc] Hello, I recently upgraded to -current because the intel graphics driver in the 4.8 release freezes my computer. I have a Core i3 with integrated graphics, every time i boot my laptop with multiprocessor turned on i get

Re: smtpd.conf syntax.

2011-02-01 Thread David Walker
Hi Gilles. I've installed a snapshot from January 29 (first time ever - very painless): uname -rvm 4.9 GENERIC#644 i386 An issue I had looks okay. That is ... accept for domain example.org relay ... and the explicit ... accept from local for domain example.org relay ... both now work. As far as

Re: simple pf match question

2011-02-01 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:28:28PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: --- pf.conf.5 23 Jan 2011 23:34:18 - 1.488 +++ pf.conf.5 1 Feb 2011 00:01:05 - @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ the first time a packet matches a .Ar pass rule, a state entry is created; for subsequent packets

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread william dunand
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote: misc@, I recently acquired a playstation 3 and have been running into some difficulties playing it online behing my openbsd gateway. After doing some research and testing I have been able to overcome most of these problems

Re: PPPoE for IPv6

2011-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-31, Martin Schmitt m...@scsy.de wrote: Now I'm in trouble! ;-) I've been using IPv6 via tunnel for a while, with decent success. Lately, I have found an ISP here in Germany who hands out free native IPv6 access, which is to be used on top of the existing DSL line. And I already

Re: test for installed status of package, ports questions

2011-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-31, Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote: Also, I've noticed that if I don't have X11 installed, I can't seem to install certain packages (such as subversion) and certain ports (EMACS, and even if I set FLAVOR=no_x11). What's up with that? xbase is now mandatory for

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-01-31, Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote: misc@, I recently acquired a playstation 3 and have been running into some difficulties playing it online behing my openbsd gateway. After doing some research and testing I have been able to overcome most of these problems by appending the

pf rules for Load Balance Incoming Connections for webservers

2011-02-01 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
Hi list, I have 3 web servers running on port 8080 behind PF firewall. I am trying to load balance these incoming connections to these web servers. I wrote rules as below. Pls pay attention to *highligthed BOLD* rules . they are the once I have written. But, I can NOT login to these web

crontab mail

2011-02-01 Thread Leslie Jensen
If I specify MAILTO=email@my.domain in roots crontab. I'll recieve mail when cron runs what I've asked it to. With MAILTO=root Mails are delivered to the local mailbox on the system In /etc/postfix/aliases I have root: email@my.domain I've executed newaliases at the command

Re: crontab mail

2011-02-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:53:26AM +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote: If I specify MAILTO=email@my.domain in roots crontab. I'll recieve mail when cron runs what I've asked it to. With MAILTO=root Mails are delivered to the local mailbox on the system In /etc/postfix/aliases I have

Re: pf rules for Load Balance Incoming Connections for webservers

2011-02-01 Thread Ryan McBride
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:22:25PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: I have 3 web servers running on port 8080 behind PF firewall. I am trying to load balance these incoming connections to these web servers. I wrote rules as below. Pls pay attention to *highligthed BOLD* rules . they are

Re: pf rules for Load Balance Incoming Connections for webservers

2011-02-01 Thread lilit-aibolit
Indunil Jayasooriya P?P8QP5Q: Hi list, I have 3 web servers running on port 8080 behind PF firewall. I am trying to load balance these incoming connections to these web servers. I wrote rules as below. Pls pay attention to *highligthed BOLD* rules . they are the once I have written. But, I

Re: Strange OSPF messages, Router generates much packet loss

2011-02-01 Thread Mindless Gr
I have found the problem, it came from the pf's states hard-limit, which by default is 10k increasing it solved the problem is there any way for pf to inform me about reaching limits thresholds? Thanks in advance From: Mindless Gr nomindles...@yahoo.com To:

Re: Strange OSPF messages, Router generates much packet loss

2011-02-01 Thread Leen Besselink
On 02/01/2011 11:10 AM, Mindless Gr wrote: I have found the problem, it came from the pf's states hard-limit, which by default is 10k increasing it solved the problem is there any way for pf to inform me about reaching limits thresholds? Thanks in advance Their is a 'set debug' option which

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Josh Smith
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: * Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net [2011-02-01 01:40]: The better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway getting ipvshit is never a better option. Henning, Why the negativity surrounding ipv6? Thanks, -- Josh

Taller Premier de Licitaciones para CFE, Actualice a su personal, 17 de Febrero.

2011-02-01 Thread Adriana Hernandez
[IMAGE] !Promociones Especiales para grupos! Capacitacisn Impartida por: Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez. Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta: Licitaciones Pzblicas para la Ley de CFE Experto Consultor Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg.

Re: pf rules for Load Balance Incoming Connections for webservers

2011-02-01 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
*match in on $ext_if inet proto tcp to $ext_if port 8080 rdr-to $web_servers \ round-robin sticky-address * You need to pass the inbound traffic somehow (match doesn't do this). Either change the 'match in' above to 'pass in', YES, changed. It worked. or add another rule

High CPU with openbgpd 4.7

2011-02-01 Thread Tay Chee Yong
Hi, I am testing openbgpd 4.7 as a route server with a pretty huge config file of ~20mb, with lots of filtering. Doing some stress testing, I am announcing 40k routes to the route server, and CPU shoot up to 99% and access to the route session got no output. May I understand what is the cause

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com [2011-02-01 13:31]: On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: * Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net [2011-02-01 01:40]: The better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway getting ipvshit is never a better option. Why the

Re: High CPU with openbgpd 4.7

2011-02-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Tay Chee Yong t...@cheeyong.org [2011-02-01 13:59]: I am testing openbgpd 4.7 as a route server with a pretty huge config file of ~20mb, with lots of filtering. there you go. filtering is not very efficient at the moment. Does it means that when the cpu is high, RDE is busy calculating and

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:38:18PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote: | * Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com [2011-02-01 13:31]: | On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: | * Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net [2011-02-01 01:40]: | The better option is to acquire

Re: smtpd.conf syntax.

2011-02-01 Thread David Walker
Hi Gilles. I noticed something that might be unexpected, in the works, maybe worth documenting. Maybe all the old sendmail hands expect this. :] If I have this ... listen on external_if map aliases { source plain /etc/mail/aliases } accept from all for domain example.org alias aliases deliver

Re: aml parse error

2011-02-01 Thread Marco Peereboom
You are hitting a workaround in the AML code. HP has BIOS' that have AML with backwards dependencies. \\_PR_.CPU0._PPC is not in scope until acpicpu runs, but we can't run acpicpu without acpiec. The best part is that it doesn't need _REG so minus an ugly warning your machine should be working

BPF device limitations

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Johnson
Hi, I wanted to know what was the restriction on BPF devices and how to possibly go around it. We are currently running a 4.8 GENERIC.MP system with 3 dhcrelay processes (and would need to run more very soon), along with ladvd daemon for CDP and they are consuming pretty much all of the 10 BPF

Re: High CPU with openbgpd 4.7

2011-02-01 Thread Cheeyong Tay
Thanks Henning. Any plans to address efficiency of filtering in future release? i also noticed that the Prf/State seems to be showing the # of routes received before the filter when the FIB is only showing 400+ routes (there is only 1 session established at the moment). Is this normal? x.x.x.x

Re: High CPU with openbgpd 4.7

2011-02-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Cheeyong Tay t...@cheeyong.org [2011-02-01 16:16]: Thanks Henning. Any plans to address efficiency of filtering in future release? yes. no promises tho. but obviously the big exchange points who do filter want this. i also noticed that the Prf/State seems to be showing the # of routes

Re: Printing (well anything) using lpd...

2011-02-01 Thread Manuel Giraud
Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org writes: foomatic is pretty easy to set up. Thread hijacker here. I tried to setup a lpd/foomatic for a printer over network and always end-up with this kind of message in /var/log/lpd-errs: --8---cut here---start-8--- Feb

Re: BPF device limitations

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Johnson
With 10 bpf devices, I was no longer able to do a tcpdump on any interface. #tcpdump -nnnvvvi bnx1 proto pfsync tcpdump: Failed to open bpf device for bnx1: No such file or directory Once I stopped ladvd, the tcpdump started working properly again. #tcpdump -nnnvvvi bnx1 proto pfsync tcpdump:

Re: aml parse error

2011-02-01 Thread karthic kumaran
Marco Peereboom wrote: You are hitting a workaround in the AML code. HP has BIOS' that have AML with backwards dependencies. \\_PR_.CPU0._PPC is not in scope until acpicpu runs, but we can't run acpicpu without acpiec. The best part is that it doesn't need _REG so minus an ugly warning your

Re: Printing (well anything) using lpd...

2011-02-01 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote: Jacob Meuser jake...@sdf.lonestar.org writes: foomatic is pretty easy to set up. Thread hijacker here. I tried to setup a lpd/foomatic for a printer over network and always end-up with this kind of message in

Problems with ospfd and multiple clients

2011-02-01 Thread Claer
Dear list, Recently I built a new VPN hub and it seems I reached a limit in ospfd. The configuration is the following : 2 central OpenBSD (4.7 on production, 4.8 and latest snapshot in our lab). they both run ospfd on LAN side. 49 OpenBSD clients, running IPSEC + gif encapsulation over to each

Re: aml parse error

2011-02-01 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:01:26PM +0530, karthic kumaran wrote: Marco Peereboom wrote: You are hitting a workaround in the AML code. HP has BIOS' that have AML with backwards dependencies. \\_PR_.CPU0._PPC is not in scope until acpicpu runs, but we can't run acpicpu without acpiec. The

Re: BPF device limitations

2011-02-01 Thread Bret S. Lambert
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:23:05AM -0500, Steve Johnson wrote: Hi, I wanted to know what was the restriction on BPF devices and how to possibly go around it. We are currently running a 4.8 GENERIC.MP system with 3 dhcrelay processes (and would need to run more very soon), along with ladvd

Re: BPF device limitations

2011-02-01 Thread Miod Vallat
With 10 bpf devices, I was no longer able to do a tcpdump on any interface. #tcpdump -nnnvvvi bnx1 proto pfsync tcpdump: Failed to open bpf device for bnx1: No such file or directory You need to create more bpf nodes in /dev; by default there are only ten of them. Miod

Re: PPPoE for IPv6

2011-02-01 Thread Martin Pelikan
2011/2/1, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org: presumably you are running this machine as a router and therefore can't use rtsol. Actually, you can. People were asking about this earlier on this list and as it turned out, you get only a warning that router solicitation isn't intended for

Re: simple pf match question

2011-02-01 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:28:28PM -0800, patrick keshishian wrote: Also consider explaining what defines a state (protocol, family, src/dst addr/port, rdomain). note that there is a stateful filtering section that documents this stuff in more detail. Then continue fresh:

Re: installing symux, can't load libraries

2011-02-01 Thread Kevin Chadwick
/usr/local/libexec/symux: can't load library 'libfontconfig.so.6.0' OK, I figured this out: I must have accidentally gotten the wrong xbase47.tgz fileset. problem solved. For the archives: You also get a missing library error if symux is run as a non root user and can't write it's pid file

Re: smtpd.conf syntax.

2011-02-01 Thread Gilles Chehade
strange. Quite frankly, the aliases expansion code does not work as it should and there are many cases where it will fail expanding users as you'd expect. Good news is ... I rewrote it entirely and refactored various parts of smtpd, I'm currently cleaning it up and testing before it can hit the

Re: BPF device limitations

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Johnson
Thanks. Pretty much what I had read on some older posts about limits of 10 but they were based on 4.1 and someone had replied that a lot had changed since then, so I wanted to make sure that it was still indeed the case, and that there should be no important impact in adding them. Thanks for the

PF match counter seems to be hitting a limit

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Johnson
Hi, I currently have a system that has no match rule in the ruleset, but that uses tables for a big chunk of the traffic, including our monitoring station that has a pretty high SNMP request rate. That system has a state table that usually stabilizes between 15-20K sessions, with a session search

Re: PF match counter seems to be hitting a limit

2011-02-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Steve Johnson maill...@sjohnson.info [2011-02-01 20:35]: I currently have a system that has no match rule in the ruleset, but that uses tables for a big chunk of the traffic, including our monitoring station that has a pretty high SNMP request rate. That system has a state table that usually

Re: installing symux, can't load libraries

2011-02-01 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:51:01PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: /usr/local/libexec/symux: can't load library 'libfontconfig.so.6.0' OK, I figured this out: I must have accidentally gotten the wrong xbase47.tgz fileset. problem solved. For the archives: You also get a missing library

Re: PF match counter seems to be hitting a limit

2011-02-01 Thread Steve Johnson
Ok, thanks for the tips. I did not have any ifq drops, but have still just increased the net.inet.icmp.errppslimit to 1 (from the 1000 that was before and shown below) and will see if that helps anything. Thanks also for the clarification on the match counter. I had forgotten to also include

Re: installing symux, can't load libraries

2011-02-01 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:30:56 +0100 Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote: You also get a missing library error if symux is run as a non root user and can't write it's pid file in /var/run That seems unlikely, are you sure? Tell a lie, sorry. Symon does report errors about

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Martin Schröder
2011/2/1 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de: * Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com [2011-02-01 13:31]: On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote: * Joel Wiramu Pauling j...@aenertia.net [2011-02-01 01:40]: The better option is to acquire IPv6 transit someway

Aspire One A110 - Keyboard unrecognized in latest i386 snapshot

2011-02-01 Thread Paolo Aglialoro
Hi folks, I was running -current (dated some days before Christmas 2010, maybe 24th) on my aspire one A110, and running smooth. I decided, having one month passed to upgrade to latest -current, which is now 4.9 (dated 20 Jan). Already during operation with bsd.rd something strange happens,

Re: PF match counter seems to be hitting a limit

2011-02-01 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Steve Johnson maill...@sjohnson.info wrote: I had forgotten to also include the sysctl changes that I had made as well, mostly based from calomel.org, which were the following: net.inet.ip.ttl=254 I love this. Bigger is better!

Re: Running ksh -l in terminal window under XFCE

2011-02-01 Thread Paolo Aglialoro
Thank you all, I missed that tick in the prefs it did the trick :) Sorry for the noise...

Re: nat static-port option

2011-02-01 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Martin Schrvder mar...@oneiros.de wrote: So what will you tell your customers 2012 when you can't get ipv4 for them? The same thing he told them in 2008.

Actualización Urgente en México D.F. Licitaciones de PEMEX, Evite Sanciones, Reserve su espacio!

2011-02-01 Thread Adriana Hernandez
[IMAGE] Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico Presenta Licitaciones Pzblicas para la Ley de PEMEX 18 de Febrero de 2011, Mixico D.F. 10 Horas de Capacitacisn Efectiva impartidas por nuestro consultor Mtro. Alberto Ledesma Gonzalez Smguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de

Re: pf rules for Load Balance Incoming Connections for webservers

2011-02-01 Thread Rodrigo Mosconi
2011/2/1 Indunil Jayasooriya induni...@gmail.com # macros (...) web_servers = { 192.168.x.64, 192.168.x.66, 192.168.x.67 } lan_net=192.168.x.0/24 A table isn't better? I mean, we can control it without reloading the pf rules and the matching algorithm is better.

Re: Aspire One A110 - Keyboard unrecognized in latest i386 snapshot

2011-02-01 Thread Miod Vallat
I was running -current (dated some days before Christmas 2010, maybe 24th) on my aspire one A110, and running smooth. I decided, having one month passed to upgrade to latest -current, which is now 4.9 (dated 20 Jan). [...] Built-in keyboard support on the Aspire One is known to be broken,

Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Keefer
4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 I write a rule that says this: pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 and pfctl shows this: pass in on em2 inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:100:900f::/56 keep state Maybe I'm crazy, but it seems 2620:100:900f:: would be /48

Re: Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:51:00PM -0800, Brian Keefer wrote: | 4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 | | I write a rule that says this: | pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 | | and pfctl shows this: | pass in on em2 inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:100:900f::/56

Re: Bug with PF IPv6 subnet calculation, or my brain?

2011-02-01 Thread Brian Keefer
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:51:00PM -0800, Brian Keefer wrote: | 4.9 GENERIC#626 i386 | | I write a rule that says this: | pass in on $ext_if inet6 proto ipv6-icmp from any to 2620:0100:900f:c9::/56 | | and pfctl shows this: | pass in on

Alege o locuinta pentru tine

2011-02-01 Thread Consilier CFI
Daca aveti probleme cu vizionarea acestui email dati [click aici] pentru a vizualiza varianta online! [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Newsletter 01.02.2011 [IMAGE] CaseFaraIntermediari.roUrmariti-ne pe Facebook!Urmariti-ne pe Twitter!Urmariti-ne pe Blogger! [IMAGE] Ultimele anunturi adaugate Vezi toate