Conundrum with aucat and rc_scripts

Hi, I've configured the ices package to stream whatever happens to be flowing into my sound card line input using this roundabout method (seems to work the best given that ices will read from a FIFO but not stdin): 1. aucat writes line in to FIFO at /dev/aucat/.raw; 2. lame reads from above

Anyterm or ??

Like to setup an ssh client behind an SSL connection, .. is there anything like anyterm available? Lee

Re: Loongson -- is it actually encumbered now?

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:32:25AM +0200, ropers wrote: > I have for some time quite covetously looked at hardware for this: > (and at the Lemote Yeeloong > netbook in particular). But I could never really afford new kit, so I > still haven't bought any loongs

Trying to use AR5413 (ath(4)) based wireless card on the Soekris net5501 in OpenBSD/i386 4.9-GENERIC

Hello. I bought a 'Z-COM AG-623C 100mW 802.11a/b/g High Power Wireless Mini-PCI Card' from DealeXtreme ( http://www.dealextreme.com/p/z-com-ag-623c-100mw-802-11a-b-g-high-power-wireless-mini-pci-card-33934) not long ago. I installed it in my Soekris net5501 yesterday. Here is the uname -a: OpenBS

Loongson -- is it actually encumbered now?

I have for some time quite covetously looked at hardware for this: (and at the Lemote Yeeloong netbook in particular). But I could never really afford new kit, so I still haven't bought any loongson hardware. But I'm still thinking about it. The big draw for

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

> So, having at least some system where you run -current, preferably in > conditions similar to production machines, is a good idea to make sure you > don't run into nasty surprises. It also helps us *a lot* as developers to > find out about problems very soon after we introduce them... good point

Re: dump -L

LOL ! Yup, you realy got me. I'm coming from FreeBSD. And, yes, I'am little bit confused, and some time totally out in the wild :-) That's why it's so nice to have someone to lean on. Thanks for your answer. /Hasse. -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@ope

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:56:55AM +0200, roberth wrote: > Seriously, why? Funnily enough, a lot of people interpreted that as "why aren't you running -current on all your machines ?" which is obviously a different question, with a legitimate different answer. Most specifically, development hap

Re: dump -L

O... So sorry... I forgot "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." :-) Hasse -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Pe veg

Re: dump -L

On 8 September 2011 21:40, Hasse Hansson wrote: > O... So sorry... I forgot > > "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." > "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." > "I will not use FreeBSD documentation for OpenBSD." > > :-) Hasse Heh. :) Thanks for your gracious resp

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:16:13 -0400 Nick Holland wrote: > Actually, No. > -stable has nothing to do about debugging or troubleshooting. Points taken but I'm pretty sure there will be more servers running stable than current so hard to find bugs are more likely to be reported on by those masses all

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:31:27 -0400 Sean Howard wrote: > I've been meaning to compile -current, but rarely get the time I need. You can just use the snapshots and snapshot packages the same as release just a different folder on the server. You don't even need to compile ports if you don't want to.

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:57:57 -0400 Mike Small wrote: > A question I wonder about though, if I'm not running current in a way > that helps the project, am I just wasting system and network resources > keeping up with it? There are many mirrors, just choose a close one, I'm sure everyone would rath

Re: dump -L

On 8 September 2011 17:59, Admin ValhallaProjectet wrote: > > I intend to use dump for backups, but got a bit confused about the lack of > the "-L" switch > > I would usually issue a command like " /sbin/dump -0Lauf " to make a > snapshot of a living file system to back up. I'm not sure why you

dump -L

Hello all # uname -a OpenBSD odin.thorshammare.org 4.9 GENERIC#671 i386 I intend to use dump for backups, but got a bit confused about the lack of the "-L" switch I would usually issue a command like " /sbin/dump -0Lauf " to make a snapshot of a living file system to back up. Can't find

Re: cwm autogroup confusion

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Okan Demirmen wrote: > On Tue 2011.09.06 at 18:46 -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: >> I'm trying to put one xterm in a different autogroup. This xterm's >> relevant properties (via xprop) are: >> >> WM_CLASS(STRING) = "xterm", "XTerm" >> WM_NAME(STRING) = "largexterm"

BSD Day 2011

Are some of the devs attending or no one invited? http://www.bsdday.eu/2011

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

roberth writes: > Seriously, why? I was current for the first time in years just before the 5.0 tag to try out Dale Rahn's powerpc interrupt changes since I was seeing errors in my log that seemed to fit the description in the email in tech asking for testers. Usually, I don't run current becau

Re: DNS lookups for hostnames in PF tables

$ echo 'match to facebook.com' | pfctl -nvf - match inet from any to 69.63.189.11 match inet from any to 69.63.181.12 match inet from any to 69.63.189.16 it takes all records from the response, but doesn't track updates. If we blocked Facebook at work in Sweden, all employees would leave in a

Re: pf shape download

Hi, I already write that I wanted to do dynamic shaping. Here my test rule output from pftop, system is 4.9 : 0 Pass In Q lo0 K00 0 inet6 from any to ::1/128 flags S/SA 1 Pass In Q lo0 K00 0

Re: DNS lookups for hostnames in PF tables

On 2011-09-08, Gerard Lally wrote: > Hi. > > First post. Beginner- to intermediate user. > > How does PF update a table with hostnames resolved by round-robin DNS? > Is it just the first DNS response that is added to the table, or > multiple DNS responses? $ echo 'match to facebook.com' | pfctl

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

I want an OS that works right out of the box. I am not a kernel hacker, nor am I wanting to do nightlys or even weekly system upgrades. I want to grab the release and have a compter that lets ne actually use the damn thing like I wasn't an idiot. I've been meaning to compile -current, but rarely

Re: DNS lookups for hostnames in PF tables

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 01:13, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> For example, is it possible to block a well-known social networking >> site which resolves to multiple IP addresses, using a PF table >> with just the hostname of the website? > No. B What you want is to expand to all of the addresses. B Sin

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On 09/08/11 06:18, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:01:06 +0200 (CEST) > HSL GmbH - wrote: > > New bugs are caught by snapshots and if you need the latest package > then current is good once you know your way around. > >> >> It's supported. > > I believe that's the main reason giv

Re: Netgear WG111.

On 08/09/2011, Jonathan Gray wrote: > This is not a urtw device (which is 0x6a00) but rather an old > style fullmac prism device which we don't support. We > support the newer softmac usb prism (upgt) and the older 802.11 > prism (wi@usb) but not that particular device. Thank you Jonathon. Best

Re: cwm autogroup confusion

On Thu 2011.09.08 at 11:37 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 8 September 2011 10:39, Okan Demirmen wrote: > > confusing that the atom is named WM_NAME while WM_CLASS includes app > > name and class, which are different properties. > > No, WM_CLASS includes the *resource* name, and the class, which h

Re: Most secure Operating-System?

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Clint Pachl wrote: > Alec Taylor wrote: >> >> What's the most secure operating system? >> >> /me is thinking OpenBSD >> >> > > SELinux by far. > > I just listened to an interview with one of the devs on the project > (http://twit.tv/show/floss-weekly/156). Wow! With

Re: cwm autogroup confusion

On 8 September 2011 10:39, Okan Demirmen wrote: > confusing that the atom is named WM_NAME while WM_CLASS includes app > name and class, which are different properties. No, WM_CLASS includes the *resource* name, and the class, which has nothing to do with WM_NAME. Yes, WM_CLASS should be used, b

Re: cwm autogroup confusion

On Tue 2011.09.06 at 18:46 -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote: > I'm trying to put one xterm in a different autogroup. This xterm's > relevant properties (via xprop) are: > > WM_CLASS(STRING) = "xterm", "XTerm" > WM_NAME(STRING) = "largexterm" > > The relevant portion of my .cwmrc is: > > autogroup 1

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:01:06 +0200 (CEST) HSL GmbH - wrote: New bugs are caught by snapshots and if you need the latest package then current is good once you know your way around. > > It's supported. I believe that's the main reason given in the faq for running stable for servers in that there

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:49:16AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Wesley M. wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Need to cvs update and rebuild, so take time. >> > And configuration file can change >> >> No compilation at

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

We're using official releases in production because: It's tested. It's supported. It's coherent in means of packages and base system. No headaches during upgrades (at least none as of now, since 4.3) You can buy it (CDs, stickers!)

Re: pre-orders for 5.0

* Theo de Raadt on Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 06:35:05AM -0600: > I have activated pre-orders for the 5.0 release -- it is scheduled for > official release on Nov 1 on the FTP sites. As usual, we try to get > CDs in people's hands slightly a few days before that. > > http://www.openbsd.org/orders.h

Re: Why aren't you running -current?

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:49:16AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Wesley M. wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Need to cvs update and rebuild, so take time. > > And configuration file can change > > No compilation at all. > > With snapshots: > > binary upgrade > sysmerge(8) fo

Re: DNS lookups for hostnames in PF tables

On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:13 PM, "Theo de Raadt" wrote: > > > > How does PF update a table with hostnames resolved by round-robin > > DNS? Is it just the first DNS response that is added to the table, > > or multiple DNS responses? > > pf doesn't do this, since it is in the kernel. pf o

Re: Netgear WG111.

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 01:23:22PM +0930, David Walker wrote: > Hi Thomas. > Sorry for the delay. > > On 21/08/2011, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > post output of 'usbdevs -v' command. > > Controller /dev/usb0: > addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), > Intel(0x8