On 2015-05-01, Marko Cupać wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have another failed build after errata patch application, this time
> with 005_httpd.patch.sig.
>
> # make
> yacc -d /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/parse.y
> mv y.tab.c parse.c
> make: don't know how to make /usr/include/ressl.h (prerequisite of:
> parse.o) S
Hello,
On freshly-installed OpenBSD 5.7, I found that any compressed manpage
isn't be displayed;
# uname -a
OpenBSD nimbus5.localnet 5.7 GENERIC#738 i386
# sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC) #738: Sun Mar 8 10:59:31 MDT 2015
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/u
On 05/01/15 19:09, Ralph Siegler wrote:
> On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:00:43 +0100, OpenBSD Store Misc wrote:
>
>> Ralph Siegler wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 May 2015 00:06:46 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>
May 1, 2015.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.7.
This
On May 1, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Melameth wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Kevin wrote:
>> How does one go about specifying a custom 404 page w/the new httpd?
>>
>> This seems like the correct directive:
>>
>>error_page 404 /some/path/404.html
>>
>> Yet it am no workie for me
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:00:43 +0100, OpenBSD Store Misc wrote:
> Ralph Siegler wrote:
>> On Fri, 01 May 2015 00:06:46 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>
>>> May 1, 2015.
>>>
>>> We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.7.
>>> This is our 37th release on CD-ROM
>>
>> strange, this
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Kevin wrote:
> How does one go about specifying a custom 404 page w/the new httpd?
>
> This seems like the correct directive:
>
> error_page 404 /some/path/404.html
>
> Yet it am no workie for me when I specify it thusly:
>
> listen on 192.168.2.10 p
Nope, nothing special in /var/log/messages. Now im compiling opennx from
ports. After OpenBSD upgrade i ran "pkg_delete -a", maybe something usefull
was deleted (samba gone for sure), so now im trying to reinstall this stuff.
Hope ill get something.
2015-05-01 18:37 GMT-04:00 Stuart Henderson :
>
Hi @misc,
after upgrading my T60 from 5.6-stable to 5.7-stable, I am experiencing the
same issue described above. Should this be filed using sendbug ? I am
currently reverting to the athn0 interface which is working fine. The em0
interface hangs after some minutes or even seconds and isn't usable
Helllooo misc,
How does one go about specifying a custom 404 page w/the new httpd?
This seems like the correct directive:
error_page 404 /some/path/404.html
Yet it am no workie for me when I specify it thusly:
listen on 192.168.2.10 port 80
root "/htdocs/example.com"
Paul de Weerd (2015-05-01 21:16 +0200):
> Note that the 27th of April is actually both "Koningsdag" (King's Day)
> and our king's birthday.
You're right, of course. As the day is commonly referred to as "King's
Day", I suggested that.
> | one more question though:
> |
> | calendar.holiday:12
Hi,
I have another failed build after errata patch application, this time
with 005_httpd.patch.sig.
# make
yacc -d /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd/parse.y
mv y.tab.c parse.c
make: don't know how to make /usr/include/ressl.h (prerequisite of:
parse.o) Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/httpd
I can't but notice th
Hi,
I have just upgraded to 5.7 and am in process of applying errata
patches.
04_smtpd.patch.sig applies fine, but building smtpd afterwards fails
with the following message:
ssl.o(.text+0x9df): In function `ssl_ctx_create':
: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_mem'
collect2:
I want to push routes to vpn clients via l2tp/ipsec. I think it is
possible because isc-dhcp-server can response to DHCPINFORM
request. But isc-dhcp server-requires to specify interface to listen,
so how i should specify clients l2tp/ipsec interfaces?
â
Gersaimov Andrew
email: grs...@gmail.com
Hi Jason,
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:39:42PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
| > 04/21 Tiradentes in Brazil
| > 04/25 Anniversary of the Revolution in Portugal
| > +04/27 King's day in Netherlands
| > 04/29 Greenary day in Japan
| > -04/30 Queen's Birthday in Netherlands, Netherlands Antilles
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:00 AM, OpenBSD Store Misc
wrote:
> one of the master CD's was damaged in transit to the production facility
The NSA agent needed more time to record an alternate version of the song.
Okay got the answer, group quota does work like a shared limit so all
user of the group are bound to the group quota.
regards
markus
Am 01.05.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Markus Rosjat:
Hi there,
when I set a quota for a group does this mean the limit is added for
the wohle group or is it added fo
Hi,
during process of applying errata patch 002_libxfont.patch.sig I have
found a typo, so here's the patch which corrects it:
--- 002_libxfont.patch.sig.orig Fri May 1 21:07:02 2015
+++ 002_libxfont.patch.sig Fri May 1 21:07:24 2015
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
Then build and install a new libXfo
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:08:07PM +0200, Einfach Jemand wrote:
> Am 01.05.2015 um 19:25 schrieb Tim van der Molen:
> > Einfach Jemand (2015-05-01 03:22 +0200):
> >> According to
> >>
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koningsdag
> >>
> >> the Netherlands are no longer celebrating the Queen's Birthd
Am 01.05.2015 um 19:25 schrieb Tim van der Molen:
> Einfach Jemand (2015-05-01 03:22 +0200):
>> According to
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koningsdag
>>
>> the Netherlands are no longer celebrating the Queen's Birthday on
>> April 30 but the King's birthday on April 27 since 2014.
>>
>> The pa
Einfach Jemand (2015-05-01 03:22 +0200):
> According to
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koningsdag
>
> the Netherlands are no longer celebrating the Queen's Birthday on
> April 30 but the King's birthday on April 27 since 2014.
>
> The patch below does not reflect the fact that this holiday is
There is some additional info:
Openbsd 5.7 stable, amd 64
dmesg:
penBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #881: Sun Mar 8 11:04:17 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4062691328 (3874MB)
avail mem = 3950624768 (3767MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256
Hi there,
when I set a quota for a group does this mean the limit is added for the
wohle group or is it added for each user in the group?
like I set 100mb as limit for the group does every member now has a
limit of 100mb or does it mean that all members have to share it? So 10
user can write
Simply use filters to deny sending prefixes to your normal peer.
The filter syntax is well explained in the bgpd.conf manpage.
On 5/2/2015 午前 12:49, Motty Cruz wrote:
Hello,
My company is getting another Internet connection, our new ISP ask that
we setup bgp to peer with one of their router to
Hello,
My company is getting another Internet connection, our new ISP ask that
we setup bgp to peer with one of their router to receive updates and
peer to another router to broadcast our routes. ISP gave us the
following setup example:
My questions is how would this setup be done in OpenBSD 5
On 05/01/15 09:35, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> well I got it running to a point were my user got loged in to his home dir.
> he is now chrooted to /var/sftp because this one is owned by root and
> not writeable for others.
> still can jump from home dir (well it's not really this home)
> /var/sftp/te
Just a minor problem with patches 004 -> 007 in 5.7
Apply by doing:
cd /usr/src
signify -Vep /etc/signify/openbsd-57-base.pub -x 005_httpd.patch.sig
-m - | \
patch -p0
--
J. Scott Heppler
i've updated my os to 5.7 stable and opennx got broken.
First connection is like "can't write to file descriptor 11 (error 32:
Broken pipe)". Second one - "Unexpected termination of nxssh"
It also generates core file, here is it - http://rghost.net/74pwCx74d
Help me, please, solve this.
Hi. There is a festival on the 30th in Edinburgh, yes. But that doesn't mean
that's the one true date. At least reading the wikipedia entry will give some
background. I think changing our calendar entry would be wrong.
By the way, your mail would have been clearer if you'd attached a diff.
jmc
okay short "improvement" maybe the wrong way but so you can revoke the
exexute permission on others
I changed ownership of /var/sftp to root:sftpuser and permission to 0710
Am 01.05.2015 um 15:46 schrieb Markus Rosjat:
Am 01.05.2015 um 15:36 schrieb Markus Rosjat:
well I got it running to a po
Am 01.05.2015 um 15:36 schrieb Markus Rosjat:
well I got it running to a point were my user got loged in to his
home dir.
he is now chrooted to /var/sftp because this one is owned by root and
not writeable for others.
still can jump from home dir (well it's not really this home)
/var/sftp/test
well I got it running to a point were my user got loged in to his home dir.
he is now chrooted to /var/sftp because this one is owned by root and
not writeable for others.
still can jump from home dir (well it's not really this home)
/var/sftp/testsftp to the root (which is the actual home)/var
On 05/01/15 07:07, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I just do some testing with sftp access and I stumbled about some things
> I dont get.
>
> if I use the chroot I would asume the user cant browse to the root dir
> but it seems he can.
> Do I get the whole chroot thing wrong here ?
You g
hi there,
I just do some testing with sftp access and I stumbled about some things
I dont get.
if I use the chroot I would asume the user cant browse to the root dir
but it seems he can.
Do I get the whole chroot thing wrong here ?
I set sshd up to just use key auth and gave the user a nol
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> > There is currently no support for 5th generation Core i*/Broadwell
>> > graphics in inteldrm(4). So all X operations with be unaccelerated.
>>
>> Thanks for the answer! Is this evident somewhere in the documentation?
>> intel(4) explicitly
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 06:23:32AM -0400, Maximilian Pichler wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > There is currently no support for 5th generation Core i*/Broadwell
> > graphics in inteldrm(4). So all X operations with be unaccelerated.
>
> Thanks for the answer! Is
Hiya,
Beltane was last night in the capital city:
- Forwarded message from Reminder Service -
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 07:09:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Reminder Service
To: skin...@britvault.co.uk
Subject: Friday's Calendar
...
..
May 01 Beltaine; Feast of the god Bel, sun god
May 01 May D
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> There is currently no support for 5th generation Core i*/Broadwell
> graphics in inteldrm(4). So all X operations with be unaccelerated.
Thanks for the answer! Is this evident somewhere in the documentation?
intel(4) explicitly lists "Intel(
On 2015-04-30 Thu 16:29 PM |, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
>
> ...
>
> dump is calling opendev() with dflags=0 (defaults), so it's using the
> character device.
>
Perfect! Ordinary users like myself can place massive confidence in
you developers' work again as:
1.1 Files With Holes In Them
...
..
OpenBSD Store Misc wrote:
We are very sorry, but there has been a production problem with 5.7 CDs
- this is NOT a problem with the 5.7 release, but a manufacturing
problem in that one of the master CD's was damaged in transit to the
production facility, and this has resulted in a delay in shippin
Ralph Siegler wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2015 00:06:46 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
May 1, 2015.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.7.
This is our 37th release on CD-ROM
strange, this time round the pre-ordered (hours after announcement) CD's
haven't shown up by now, e
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:20:59PM -0400, Maximilian Pichler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting quite slow graphics on an Intel NUC with an integrated
> Iris 6100. My guess is that acceleration is not working, although I'm
> not sure how to confirm this. The symptoms are that the X process
> constantly
I have just discovered this nice, fast emacs imitate. The man page
says:
>
> CAVEATS
> Since it is written completely in C, there is currently no language in
> which you can write extensions; however, you can rebind keys and change
> certain parameters in startup files.
> [...]
In my
42 matches
Mail list logo