> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 4:14 PM 4 wrote:
>> i'm sorry, i'm not smart, but i have a several questions. imagine that we
>> launch a ship far into space. we have only one communication channel with
>> this ship, and one day, when the ship is already very far away from
i'm sorry, i'm not smart, but i have a several questions. imagine that we
launch a ship far into space. we have only one communication channel with this
ship, and one day, when the ship is already very far away from us,
communication channel stops working because the person who wrote the
> has anyone solved this problem for themselves? three years have passed.
> terrible_ping_kludge in hid_openbsd.c gives only a few minutes of work, but
> does not solve the problem with ugen :\ it works fine in linux. maybe we can
> steal from them? ;)
allah, make sure that the theme of the
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 07:14:17PM -0500, Philippe Meunier wrote:
> This driver does not yet
> support 11n/11ac modes, and adding such support will require a big
> chunk of further development time, it won't be ready for 7.5.
dear, why didn't you write about it in man? that there is no 11ac.
azalia0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "Intel Gemini Lake HD Audio" rev 0x06: msi
azalia0: no supported codecs
-- or(with some changes) --
azalia0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 "Intel Gemini Lake HD Audio" rev 0x06: msi
azalia0: codecs: Intel/0x280d
audio0 at azalia0
-- but still doesn't work T_T --
has anyone solved this problem for themselves? three years have passed.
terrible_ping_kludge in hid_openbsd.c gives only a few minutes of work, but
does not solve the problem with ugen :\ it works fine in linux. maybe we can
steal from them? ;)
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:13:56AM +0300, 4 wrote:
> No need to be so dramatic, the ports only change when the service is
> restarted, so there is no need for constant monitoring and/or script
> running. Either you run the script (a one-liner, by the way, see below)
> on
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:13:56AM +0300, 4 wrote:
> These kind of off-topic remarks won't help you getting answers,
> -Otto
"i'm only human after all
don't put your blame on me"
>> i'm quoting the man page for mountd:
>> The -n flag historically allowed clients to use non-reserved ports when
>> communicating with mountd. In OpenBSD, a reserved port is always used.
>> "reserved port". "always".. however the port is different each time. how to
>> deal with this?
i'm quoting the man page for mountd:
The -n flag historically allowed clients to use non-reserved ports when
communicating with mountd. In OpenBSD, a reserved port is always used.
"reserved port". "always".. however the port is different each time. how to
deal with this?
how to use one key for multiple disks? i naively believed that since bioctl
does not have any keys for this, then a key on the specified key's partition
will be used, and if it is not there, a new one will be created, and deleting
the key it is the responsibility of the user, but in practice
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 03:55:49PM +0300, 4 wrote:
>>
>> "cbq can entirely be expressed in it" ok. so how do i set priorities for
>> queues in hfsc for my local(not for a router above that knows nothing about
>> my existence. tos is an absolutely unvia
> On 2023-12-01, 4 wrote:
>I don't know why you are going on about SMT here.
i'm talking about not sacrificing functionality for the sake of hypothetical
performance. the slides say that using queues degrades performance by 10%. and
you're saying there won't be anything in the queues
> On 2023-11-30, 4 wrote:
>> we can simply calculate such a basic thing as the flow rate by dividing the
>> number of bytes in the past packets by the time. we can control the speed
>> through delays in sending packets. this is one side of the question. as for
>> th
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:12:02 +0300
> 4 wrote:
>> i haven't used queues for a long time, but now there is a need.
>> previously, queues had not only a hierarchy, but also a priority. now
>> there is no priority, only the hierarchy exists.
> It took me quite some
> On 11/29/23 6:47 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2023-11-29, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
yes, all this can be make without hierarchy, only with priorities(because
hierarchy it's priorities), but who and why decided that eight would be
enough? the one who created cbq- he created it
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 02:57:23PM +0300, 4 wrote:
>> so what happened to cbq? why such the powerful and useful thing was removed?
>> or Theo delete it precisely because it was too good for obsd? %D
> Actually, the new queueing system was done by Henning, planned as far b
> On 2023-11-29, 4 wrote:
>> here is a simple task, there are millions of such tasks. there is an
>> internet connection, and although it is declared as symmetrical 100mbit
>> it's 100 for download, but for upload it depends on the time of day, so
>> we can for
so what happened to cbq? why such the powerful and useful thing was removed? or
Theo delete it precisely because it was too good for obsd? %D
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:12:02AM +0300, 4 wrote:
>> i haven't used queues for a long time, but now there is a need. previously,
>> queues had not only a hierarchy, but also a priority. now there is no
>> priority, only the hierarchy exists. i was sur
i haven't used queues for a long time, but now there is a need. previously,
queues had not only a hierarchy, but also a priority. now there is no priority,
only the hierarchy exists. i was surprised, but i thought that this is quite in
the way of Theo, and it is possible to simplify the queue
> What does mean `broadcom ac chipset`?
> Do you have example product at hand?
> Which OpenBSD driver is that?
> Are you saying this in context of hostap mode?
i've tried everything from 11n and above that host ap supports. this is the
best variant of the worst, but it definitely works(relatively
Здравствуйте, Stuart.
Вы писали 25 ноября 2022 г., 11:54:13:
> On 2022-11-24, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> If you want something standalone (non OpenBSD) take a look at tp-link's
> omada range. Their java+mongo management software (unifi clone) won't
> run on OpenBSD but the APs have a
> I'm using for few years now on OpenBSD accesspoint (mediaopt hostap)
> based on following miniPCI card:
> # dmesg | grep -e ^ath
> athn0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR928X" rev 0x01: apic 5 int 16
> athn0: AR9280 rev 2 (2T2R), ROM rev 22, address 04:f0:21:45:6a:c4
> I don't remember where
-sector PIO, LBA, 19470MB, 39876480 sectors
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 4
wd1(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 4
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0:TSSTcorp, CD/DVDW TS-H552B, TS03 ATAPI 5/cdrom
removable
atapiscsi1 at pciide0 channel 1
Hi all,
B
I have a machine with 4.8 OpenBSD, which I want to use as a gateway.
But I can not get any traffic on the 2nd nic.
Forwarding for inet and inet6 is set =1
It is not a problem of the nics. If I install nic2 first then it works and
nic1
doesn't work.
It is also not a problem of PF, which
I have a machine with OpenBSD 4.8 which Iwant to use as a gateway.
I am unable to get any traffic from, to ,through the second nic.
ifconfig shows that the interface is active
inet and inet6 forwarding is set =1
I deactivated pf
This problem is independent of the cards I use
If I install the nic2
SBS Online Epitime Ba~lad}.
Kitap Fiyat}na Epitim
5-6-7-8. S}n}flar
24 Saat Online Epitim
SBS' de En B|y|k Kaynak
2009 SBS'de Vrt|~m|~ 100 Soru
Deneyimli Vpretmenlerce Haz}rlanan Binlerce SBS Sorusu
Toplam 98 Adet vzg|n SBS Deneme S}nav}
]nternet \zerinden Vzg|n,kaliteli SBS Epitimi
Bilgisayar}
28 matches
Mail list logo
