Hi, fixed in OpenBSD 6.8. Thanks.
On 10/5/19 11:09 PM, Adrian Ali wrote:
Hello, I am Newbie in OpenBSD, I have been using it for 1 year. I am
an advanced user in Linux and Unix, I have been using it for 25 years.
My last installation of OpenBSD was on a Dell Precision 7820 Tower
workstation
https://tilde.institute/
dum., 19 iul. 2020, 08:47 Chris Cappuccio a scris:
> ibs...@ripsbusker.no.eu.org [ibs...@ripsbusker.no.eu.org] wrote:
> > Aaron Mason writes:
> > > What are you looking for in such a service?
> >
> > Minimally, SSH login, 100GB disk space, and build tools
> >
> > It's ea
Hello, I am Newbie in OpenBSD, I have been using it for 1 year. I am an
advanced user in Linux and Unix, I have been using it for 25 years. My
last installation of OpenBSD was on a Dell Precision 7820 Tower
workstation. I have problems with the detection of USB ports. The last
test was performe
. The guys who
work on the code don't necessarily have the time to read misc@ or even
tech@ religiously, but they do look at bug reports. My problem
languished for a year until someone reminded me that bug reports were a
thing. ;)
Adrian
7;re planning on more extensive
testing.
Have a look at https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html for some hints and
feel free to ping me if you get stuck.
Adrian
@. I
ended up finally logging an actual bug, which dlg@ picked up, and he put
a fix in -current that fixed my problem completely.
Try a current snapshot and see if that helps?
Adrian
t;ldpd" on the PE host, ARP
works fine as expected every time.
I guess I could fix this with static ARP entries, but that doesn't seem
like quite the right thing. My test setup is running in Virtualbox
VMs. I also replicated the issue under VMWare ESX using 'vic' interfaces.
Does anyone have any clues on this?
Thanks in advance,
Adrian Close
Hi Job,
>Make a photo to prevent typos.
No problem. I wasn't sure if the list would like attachments, but here it is
(attached).
Thanks,
Adrian Close
pe 2 at 0cfeda8000 for 16KB
Region 17: type 2 at 0xff31 for 13248KB
Region 18: type 1 at 0x1 for 534773760KB
Low ram: 624KB High ram: 1823020KB
Total free memory: 536768880KB
[..snip..]
... with apologies for any typos as I copied that manually from the screen.
Thanks.
Adrian Close
mory out?
>512GB is the limit for physmem in OpenBSD amd64 (I believe, last time I looked,
unless someone upped it). It's possible the bios remapped some memory past
512GB and we got confused.
I'll see if I can find anything obvious in the BIOS settings along those lines.
Thanks,
Adrian Close
ed to go into production as a Linux-based hypervisor (sorry), but
I've got some time with it before that needs to happen so I thought I'd try to
spin up OpenBSD on it.
Thanks,
Adrian Close
s to (eg. R630, R620) works OK. Normally I'd
try disabling stuff in UKC, but booting with "-c" has the same result and no
UKC> prompt.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I might get this going?
Thanks,
Adrian Close
Hello Kim,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:56:48AM +0200, Kim Zeitler wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
>
> On 31.07.2014 18:59, Adrian Jervolino wrote:
> >
> > My questions to you are: Has anybody ran into similar issues and was
> > able to resolve them? Do you think this is
resolve them? Do you think this is a OpenBSD related issue and
actually solveable (in a reasonable amount of time)?
Swaping the motherboard is currently no option, so I'm thankfull for
every hint.
Adrian
OpenBSD 5.5 (RAMDISK_CD) #237: Wed Mar 5 09:43:42 MST 2014
dera...@amd64.open
Proposals deadline is
Monday, May 30, 2011
so please send in your proposals to submiss...@eurobsdcon.org now!
Adrian Steinmann, on behalf of the EuroBSDCon 2011 Program Committee
EuroBSDCon 2011 Call
6.3.15 (zynapse.lan.ini.uzh.ch)
Dest address = 172.16.3.255
UDP header:
bb b5 22 3d
0 9 a5 ba
source port = bbb5 = 48053
dest port = 223d = 8765 (Ultraseek HTTP ?)
length = 9
Data:
1d
Adrian
- --
Adrian M. Whatley
Universitaet/ETH Zuerich,
Institut fuer Neuroinformatik,
Winterthurerstrasse 190,
Hello chaps :)
I just saw this on the net about a new OS from M$ called Singularity. What
do you think of it thus far?
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/174267/microsoft-releases-robust-new-operating-system.html
There are a small number of people that command respect in the IT industry
and as far as I know, Richard and Theo are two such people. I am sure that
if people like you began to endorse open source hardware more people would
move in that direction. I remember reading a quote from Sun about modern
I have read some (time does not allow me to read it all) of the threads
about C vs.C++ and would like to know if anyone here has worked through the
courses from either of the following people and if so, what did you think?
I read in the thread with Linus's thoughts of C++ but am curious that if he
Hello all,
I am sure many of you will be familiar with the web-site Linux from scratch
(http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/) which is fine for those who wish to use
Linux but is has anyone here tried it with Open?
A.
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:03:31AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> So your problem seems to be that rsync -S is inefficient to the point
> where it is not useable. I do not use rsync a lot, so I do not know
> if there's a solution to that problem. It does seem strange that a
> feature to solve a pro
How much modern computer hardware is fully open source or at least has fully
open interfaces that allow anyone to create device drivers? I Sun and
another company (Anglo-Italian firm Simply-RISC) released a processor based
on Suns offering but has anyone else? Would you be more inclined to buy a
This thread is the first I have heard of him. Who is (or was) he?
A.
On 01/11/2007, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hmm, on Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:04:37AM +0100, ropers said that
> > How would people feel about creating a Wikipedia article for Itojun?
> > Surely his IPv6 work mak
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 03:16:31PM +0300, Lars NoodC)n wrote:
> Granted that quote is from a competitor (VMware, which seems to be a
> broken linux kernel) but MS has 'partnered' with XenSource and we know
> what the ultimate results will be.
>
> The choices narrow.
> Can kqemu be compiled for OBS
I know what you mean, I have to use Flash 9 :S
A.
On 15/10/2007, Raimo Niskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:25:46PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Personally, I absolutely LOVE the fact that OpenBSD doesn't
Has anyone here used a new Quad Core chip from AMD (or indeed Intel) and if
so, how do they run with OpenBSD?
A.
1. Who here knows about OpenCVS?
2. How is it used?
3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as
4.2?
Regards,
A.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:09:08PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:32:35 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your licence puts you in the position that you always depend on the
> > goodwill of the persons from whom you want to get code ba
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:02:30PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:38:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> | > Something is wrong if your licence text clearly states that you MUST
> | > give back, but then you don't return the favour on grounds that &q
t;-- snip -->
We are talking about dual-licenced code, not about BSD licenced code
incorporated into GPL'ed code.
That other people can distribute the original dual-licenced code
dual-licenced or BSD-only, and that you can get the code under this
licences from there, is without a dou
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:38:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> | It's not about lazyness of BSD developers, many people who consider the
> | BSD licence more free than the GPL argue that the advantage of the BSD
>
F's new GPLv3. If you have such differences in
mind it sounds ridiculous when people don't differentiate between the
FSF and the Linux kernel community.
> kind regards,
> jcr
cu
Adrian
[1] I don't know the background of the 2-clause BSD licence, but at
least for the
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:20:19AM +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
Hi Hannah!
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:13:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:39:26PM +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Adrian Bun
re right now. Many of them claiming that their code
>> is being "stolen".
>
> They did not KEEP ATTRIBUTION INTACT.
This was a mistake in one patch that had never been merged, and this
mistake has been corrected once it was discovered.
> Jason Dixon
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
should give
back is simply dishonest.
Is your intention to allow people to include your code into GPL'ed code
and never give back, or is your intention that this shouldn't happen?
And whatever your intention is should be stated in your licence.
cu
Adrian
--
"I
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 10:39:26PM +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 09:59:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:48:47AM -0700, Can E. Acar wrote:
> >>...
> >> First, these developers got questionabl
tch has never been merged.
A mistake.
No bad intentions.
Shit happens.
Resolved as soon as people were made aware of the mistake.
> Can
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Adrian Fisher wrote:
>
> > Hello there,
> >
> > Does OpenBSD support virtualisation where multiple computers
> > operate as one
> > single virtual system rather than just one syste
Hello there,
Does OpenBSD support virtualisation where multiple computers operate as one
single virtual system rather than just one system running as multiple
virtual systems? I am thinking of buying a series of blade systems which I
want to run as one single system to offer redundancy for increa
Hello there,
I recently began to read about OpenBSD with a view to installing it on
my home system (I am somewhat new to Unix) and while I was able to
install the base system without any problems I was unable to find
clear instructions or pointers on how to go on from there.
I wish to install the
> cooperation extended and a knife kept behind their back.
Theo explicitely accused Alan that telling people that it was OK to
choose one licence for dual licenced code was "advising people to break
the law".
I hope you agree when talking about "cooperation [...] based on moral
nce had a GSX setup where guest hardware clocks typically ran at 1/3 -
1/10th of realtime, and sped up when the guest OS was eating lots of CPU,
but that doesn't sound like what you have...
Adrian Closeemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
107 Essex St, Pascoe Vale web:ht
Hi all
sorry to interrupt
If you have experience to run the openbsd around 700M,
can you share to me how to handle the bandwidth graph.
I post a question before about openbsd to support 64
bit counter.
My bandwidth graph is horrible when it reaches 557M
everytime.
Thank you
--- Chris C
Hi all
I heard from freebsd newsgroup that FreeBSD's internal
network counters are 32-bit and can't support 64 bit
counter in net-snmp!
how abt openbsd? I need to run net-snmp to support 64
bit counter
Thank you for your information.
> I am running freebsd 4.11 release and want to have
> net-s
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Joel Knight wrote:
Check the usual suspects?
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1?
Appropriate "pass" rules on the internal interface?
Verify the return path doesn't have a problem?
Also, make sure you're not blocking the ipencap packets.
Check various places with tcpdump - see what's
This is a bad mail?
Adrian Chelar
Home : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
susbcribe misc
test mail
Adrian Chelar
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear all
Thank you for your mail
I only know that 68.50.185.xxx is our server
but I still don't understand what it did
Thank you
--- Christopher Kruslicky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 30 April 2005 06:01 pm, adrian kok
> wrote:
>
> > 1/ Why are there
Hi all
I got the firewall log but don't understand it
1/ Why are there 3 ipaddresses in this log
what is source and destination address?
2/ 172.17.217.168 should be private ip and that
address
should not be in public network
How is it related to address 68.50.185.xxx?
What is happening here?
T
50 matches
Mail list logo
