Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-22 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012-02-21, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > read and weap. i did. when you do a cd install, it puts > src (sys), and xenocara in /usr. that "primes" the src/sys > tree. if you then _move_ those trees out of the way entirely, > and do a cvs checkout of the whole tree, well that what *I* s

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:44:19 -0500 Josh Grosse wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 > > Josh Grosse wrote: > > > > > Because the error appeared to be an out-of-sync issue, I would have liked > > > to see the ou

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Josh Grosse
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 > Josh Grosse wrote: > > > Because the error appeared to be an out-of-sync issue, I would have liked > > to see the output of: > > > > ls -l `which config` > > cat /usr/src/sys/CVS/Ta

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:20 -0500 Josh Grosse wrote: > My apologies if the redactions cause improper attributions, but > this has gotten very deep, and Dhu replied to himself. For readability > I've tried to wrap lines, too. > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:37:25PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbel

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Josh Grosse
My apologies if the redactions cause improper attributions, but this has gotten very deep, and Dhu replied to himself. For readability I've tried to wrap lines, too. On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:37:25PM -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 > Carson Chittom wr

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread patrick keshishian
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 > Carson Chittom wrote: > >> Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: >> >> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 >> > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> >>

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:52:27 -0600 Carson Chittom wrote: > Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 > > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > >> Ted Unangst wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campb

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Carson Chittom
Duncan Patton a Campbell writes: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> Ted Unangst wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >> > > Ted Unangst wrot

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:38:25 + Miod Vallat wrote: > > There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > > build witho

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Guenther
Going back to the first message in the thread... On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: ... > then do the kernel make > # cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf > # config GENERIC > config: symlink(machine -> ../../../../arch/amd64/include): File exists > config: symlink(amd64

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Nick Holland
On 02/21/2012 01:28 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: ... There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not build without the tre

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:38:25 + Miod Vallat wrote: > > There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > > build witho

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:53:48 -0800 > Philip Guenther wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 >> > Ted Unangst wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 201

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Miod Vallat
> There's a minor error in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html such that > it specifies that to "follow stable" you can pull the whole tree with cvs > and run as such. This is not the case. The 5.0-Stable tree will not > build without the tree being first primed with the 5.0-Release code. Of co

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:53:48 -0800 Philip Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell > wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:16:34 -0700 Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 > > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > > > >> you are running config from a

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Guenther
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 > Ted Unangst wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: >> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 >> > Ted Unangst wrote: >> > >> >> you are running config from a different

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-21 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:24:56 -0500 Ted Unangst wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> you are running config from a different version than the source you > >> are trying to compile. > > > > Ok, but i

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-20 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 > Ted Unangst wrote: > >> you are running config from a different version than the source you >> are trying to compile. > > Ok, but if I've started with 5.0 Release, how do I get 5.0 Stable's config > with

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-20 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:05:19 -0500 Ted Unangst wrote: > you are running config from a different version than the source you > are trying to compile. Ok, but if I've started with 5.0 Release, how do I get 5.0 Stable's config without building it? d > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a C

Re: 5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-20 Thread Ted Unangst
you are running config from a different version than the source you are trying to compile. On Mon, Feb 20, 2012, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > arrrgh. hit the send b4 that was finished, anyways > > > I install 5.0 AMD64 base.. > # uname -a > OpenBSD jimg.indx.ca 5.0 GENERIC.MP#63 amd64 > >

5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-20 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
arrrgh. hit the send b4 that was finished, anyways I install 5.0 AMD64 base.. # uname -a OpenBSD jimg.indx.ca 5.0 GENERIC.MP#63 amd64 then fetch the patchbranch source.. export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_0 -P src ports xenocara then do the

5.0 Stable (amd64) build appears broken.

2012-02-20 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
I install 5.0 AMD64 base.. # uname -a OpenBSD jimg.indx.ca 5.0 GENERIC.MP#63 amd64 -- Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostro voco.