‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, 20 December 2020 10:28, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> The story is, that I log time to lives (TTL) with a setsockopt() on my logging
> DNS server. Whenever mail.openbsd.org sends a mail it does not ask its cache
> but does a dns query every time. This
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:49:49AM +, Laura Smith wrote:
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Sunday, 20 December 2020 10:28, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>
>
> > The story is, that I log time to lives (TTL) with a setsockopt() on my
> > logging
> > DNS server. Whenever
Hi,
This is a question to the mail administrator. What happened on Friday Oct. 9th
of this year on the Internet? Now I don't want you to overly worry because I'm
just going through my logs and there is a small story to tell, and besides it
could have happened on the Internet and had no
Hi Patrick,
Le 05/09/2013 05:24, patrick keshishian a écrit :
Does there exist a nice way to do this without further sub-dividing
the /28?
I would bridge the Internet-facing interface and the interface that
connects to the switch. This way you can filter with PF without
subnetting your
On 9/4/13, Denis Fondras open...@ledeuns.net wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Le 05/09/2013 05:24, patrick keshishian a écrit :
Does there exist a nice way to do this without further sub-dividing
the /28?
I would bridge the Internet-facing interface and the interface that
connects to the switch. This
Hi Networking gurus,
Say I have /28 address space. Between them and the internet is
pf. Not all of the addresses are in use ATM.
I may have the need to add a couple new servers behind that pf
server within the same /28 range. Problem: I need to have traffic
between the new servers and what
Seems like it would be pretty straightforward to NAT, no?
/--existing servers /28
EVIL - lie agreed upon [Puffy]
\-new servers on RFC 1918
Would need to know more to make better recommendations.
On
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:57:09PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe I just wrote too many words. In simple terms, once a new route
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Claudio Jekercje...@diehard.n-r-g.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 05:57:09PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
*aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
Maybe I just wrote too many words. In simple terms, once a new route
has been added to the routing table, all traffic should consider the
new route right? So, is the ppp interface treated differently when it
comes to routing in OpenBSD?
--patrick
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
*aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
Well, you elided useful data by only including part of the netstat
output, you obfuscated it to make it harder to read, you failed to
even mention what version of OpenBSD
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
*aham* B ... was this a really stupid question?
Well, you elided useful data by only including part of the netstat
output, you obfuscated it
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Philip Guentherguent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:36 AM, patrick keshishianpkesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
*aham* ... was this a really stupid question?
Well, you elided
Hello,
I ran into an interesting problem trying to port some code to linux
and thinking about it a bit, I am not sure which has the more
desirable behavior: linux or openbsd.
Say host h1 starts exchanging some packets with host h2, which is
on a remote network (n2). As this is going on, h1
The upgrade to OpenBSD 4.1 on my Zaurus 3000 went without
problem, but then I tried to connect the Zaurus to my LAN
using the (supported) USB Netgear FA120 dongle. I am not
using a USB hub, although I have one and have shown that
it works. The Netgear FA120 works, too, but NOT INITIALLY!
I must
On 5/23/07, William Bulley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) is the Netgear FA120 detected? (doesn't seem that it is
until after I unplug/re-plug in the USB cable)
Yes, though you may be asking for slightly too much power...
2) why do I have to unplug/re-plug in the USB cable for it
According to Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 5/23/07, William Bulley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) is the Netgear FA120 detected? (doesn't seem that it is
until after I unplug/re-plug in the USB cable)
Yes, though you may be asking for slightly too much power...
Thanks for the
Finally I'm going to have time, to put in house a firewall with openbsd,
to learn pf.
I'm not an expert in networks, so sorry for this OT, not related to
openbsd.
There are 3 questions: about Vlans, usb installation and DoS atacks...
The scene is the following one:
about 50
On 2006/10/15 13:33, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
To the garage, only a network cable can go, because they do not fit more
in the tubes. I would like that everything was filtered, but I cannot
put a always runing machine in my room. Switch of 8 ports is not
manageable and the 3com produces
On 15/10/06, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally I'm going to have time, to put in house a firewall with openbsd,
to learn pf.
I'm not an expert in networks, so sorry for this OT, not related to
openbsd.
There are 3 questions: about Vlans, usb installation and DoS atacks...
El dom, 15-10-2006 a las 14:41 +0200, ropers escribis:
My questions are:
If i send all the traffic direct to the garage, passing by the 8 ports,
and soon returns by the same cable, the machines in the 8 ports are in
danger some? (they would be in a diferent vlan, managed by firewall,
El dom, 15-10-2006 a las 13:38 +0100, Stuart Henderson escribis:
On 2006/10/15 13:33, Iqigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
To the garage, only a network cable can go, because they do not fit more
in the tubes. I would like that everything was filtered, but I cannot
put a always runing machine in my
23 matches
Mail list logo
