On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Matthew Bettinger wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities. I know I can go
piecemeal one from FRY'
Matthew Bettinger wrote:
> I was glancing at the sunfire v20z , ibm xseries 306 and HP DL360
> with Smart Array 6i. The dl360 looks like it fits the bill but I
> have had problems in the past with the smart array on older DL class
> boxes. The server(s) will be used for web sh
I run heaps off Dell PowerEdge 1550, 1650, 1750 and 1850 without issues.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:24:18PM -0500, Matthew Bettinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a ma
On 7/27/05, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:24:18PM -0500, Matthew Bettinger wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> > that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
> >
Matthew Bettinger wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
>that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
>that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities. I know I can go
>piecemeal one from FRY's but I
ou
then tell OpenBSD to use a serial console in the usual way.
Just my experiences.
-Bob
* Matthew Bettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 18:47]:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> that will run OpenBSD for webserver
d success running i386. 650's and 750's are ide only.
I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
Dell didn't have an amd64 based server, and Sun and IBM did, so we
switched. Prior to that I bought lots of dell stuff and had good
experiences with them. (still do w
On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
> Dell didn't have an amd64 based server, and Sun and IBM did, so we
> switched. Prior to that I bought lots of dell stuff and had good
> experiences wit
Kevin wrote:
>On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
>>Dell didn't have an amd64 based server, and Sun and IBM did, so we
>>switched. Prior to that I bought lots of dell
> At work I don't really have a choice -- we can either buy Sun or
> Dell, or spend weeks justifying not using the approved vendors.
>
Then my reccomendation under your supported hardware agreement
is exactly what I use:
sun V20Z server
Dell Perc
1650, 1750 machines
> with good success. I use the ami builtin for raid on the 1650 and 1750
> with good success running i386. 650's and 750's are ide only.
>
>I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
> Dell didn't have an amd64 based server,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Why do you say that? performance and security implications
amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
--
Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2005-07-28 13:21:06 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> BTW, my one bitch about the v20z is sun are a bunch of retards
> and put all the vents on the top and bottom, so I'm reluctant to rack
> them one on top of the other.
The only thing from Sun on the v20z is the label (and an os
which you won't u
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:38:31 -0600 Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are running production web servers on OpenBSD running on IBM
> 325E's as well as Sun V20Z's, running OpenBSD. We've had decent luck
> with both the i386 and amd64 distro on those. I have used a demo HP
> with good s
* Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
>
> amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
>
Bingo. You got it.
-Bob
> * Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
> >
> > amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
> >
>
> Bingo. You got it.
This is hogwash. Our
And about performance reason?
Thanks once more.
On 7/28/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > > > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
> >
> That is not a valid security reason. Sorry.
>
Hogwash. It is when the machine doesn't run OpenBSD. Not all of mine
do. and I don't count on *any* vendor other than OpenBSD doing
anything like W^X on i386. (i.e. solaris, windows, etc.) I do expect
in the next year or two we will see stu
Kevin wrote:
While Sun is offering some very nice AMD64 (and Sparc64) kit,
Sun just never seems to understand that customers want
embedded hardware RAID controllers on the motherboard.
Kevin Kadow
No need for such thing, it would make things (much) more expensive,
DiskSuite will do.
Ioan
Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-07-28 13:21:06 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
BTW, my one bitch about the v20z is sun are a bunch of retards
and put all the vents on the top and bottom, so I'm reluctant to rack
them one on top of the other.
The only thing from Sun on the v20z is the la
On 2005-07-30 13:01:32 +1000, Ioan Nemes wrote:
> Martin Schrvder wrote:
> >The only thing from Sun on the v20z is the label (and an os
> >which you won't use).
> Yes, and Dell is all re-branded Intel.
Next time you see a v20z read the label at the back.
Best
Martin
--
ht
On 2005-07-30 14:13:25 +0200, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> On 2005-07-30 13:01:32 +1000, Ioan Nemes wrote:
> > Martin Schrvder wrote:
> > >The only thing from Sun on the v20z is the label (and an os
> > >which you won't use).
> > Yes, and Dell is all re-branded Intel.
>
> Next time you see a v20z read
Hi folk
has anyone every attempted (or would it be possible
(relatively painlessly)) to get openbsd running on
something like this?
http://www.projectblackdog.com/site/product.html
it comes with linux kernel, but I would love a few of
these around with OpenBSD to use as a secure ultra
portable b
Brandon Mercer wrote:
> Matthew Bettinger wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
>>that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
>>that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities
On 8/23/05, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Mercer wrote:
> > Matthew Bettinger wrote:
> >>Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> >>that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
> >>that has
Kevin wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Brandon Mercer wrote:
>>
>>>Matthew Bettinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
>>>>that will run OpenBSD for webs
On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Kevin wrote:
If you can go beyond the big vendors, you might also look at smaller
companies that support OpenBSD. Iron Systems, Sera Systems, etc.
I've been getting quotes from Iron Systems the last few days. I
haven't ordered any of their hardware yet, but the
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason Dixon
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 7:33 PM
> To: Kevin
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: 1U server recommendation
>
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Kevin wrote:
o my queries regarding
serial BIOS redirection and OpenBSD supported cards.
I'm working on a serial console server project and have some odd
requirements to meet, plus a (relatively) tight budget.
> I ended up buying one machine (for starters) from the folks at Iron
> Systems. They m
Matthew Bettinger wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dixon
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 7:33 PM
To: Kevin
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: 1U server recommendation
On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Kevin wrote:
If you can
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:11 PM, Kevin wrote:
>
> > If you can go beyond the big vendors, you might also look at smaller
> > companies that support OpenBSD. Iron Systems, Sera Systems, etc.
>
> I've been getting quotes from Iron Systems the last few days.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Don Boling wrote:
SNIP
> Are their sales staff very knowledgeable? Dell's are not!
> The Dell rep asked me what kind of "Windows version", BSD was.
> He was schooled.
>
> --don
they speak BSD just fine
diana
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Kevin wrote:
> I've been getting quotes from Bob Sidhu at Iron Systems for the last
> few hours, he's been very responsive to my queries regarding serial
> BIOS redirection and OpenBSD supported cards.
Bob Sidhu has always been very helpful to me in the past. Iron Systems
ev
On 7/27/05, Matthew Bettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
> that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
> that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities. I know I c
Diana Eichert wrote:
> Bob Sidhu has always been very helpful to me in the past. Iron Systems
> even helped me out in one of the hardware fundraisers I did or maybe they
> actually provided hardware, gee I can't remember.
I too have been getting quotes from them the past few days. Although
I can
Hi
I have a problem with openbsd with pf
I try to do
[(fxp0) - 100.0.100.10] -> [web server 1 (100.0.100.1)]
|
[openbsd (xl0)] <---> Internet
|
[(sis0) - 100.0.200.10] -> [web server 2 (100.0.200.1)]
i hope it's enough clear...
So my problem is that i can&#
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:58:48 -0800
"Bruno S. Delbono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> One of our servers got hacked this morning. The culprit turned out to be
> mambo. This is a second time this has happened with mambo and I am ready
> to junk it.
I would've junked it the first time thoug
> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
Tried postnuke or phpnuke or one of the other hundreds of varients
based around the word "nuke"?
I love the way these people have a website telling you all about them.
Regards
Edd
On 26 Nov 2005, at 11:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
>
> Tried postnuke or phpnuke or one of the other hundreds of varients
> based around the word "nuke"?
I've heard that they're not great in terms of security either.
Have you considered Ruby on R
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:58:48 -0800, "Bruno S. Delbono"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>One of our servers got hacked this morning. The culprit turned out to be
>mambo. This is a second time this has happened with mambo and I am ready
>to junk it.
>
>Is there a better, more secure replacem
this is a bit off-topic, but hey
On 11/26/05, Bruno S. Delbono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
use google, there are tons of cms out there, your question is
obviously too generic.
look at their vulnerabilities, look at their code, look at their
knitti wrote:
try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes, with
both languages it is _possible_ to write secure code, but actually
very seldom practiced. Everything else is a matter of taste and the
task to solve.
This is a shame about perl, but I can't say you're wrong.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:36:46AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> But this isn't really a perl problem, or a php problem. It's possible to
> write secure code in many environments, but it's not easy. Most cms
> developers worry more about having tons of features than about secure
> code. "Security
Bruno S. Delbono wrote:
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
typo3
Stephan
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:56:41PM +0100, knitti said that
> try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes, with
that is a silly advice. if one knows what to look for, php and
perl are just as secure as anything else. as with anything else,
there are security conscious ph
t being visible. However, thanks to complexities,
we also need Identity managers etc. that glue on the webserver and of
course webmail which is a java based webmail solution (Sun JES Server).
Looking deeper into plone, I can't find it being anymore secure than
mambo and the complexities i
On Nov 26, 2005, at 7:39 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:56:41PM +0100, knitti said that
try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes,
with
that is a silly advice. if one knows what to look for, php and
perl are just as secure as anything else.
On 11/27/05, Bruno S. Delbono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a secure php CMS that any of you might have had experience with
> (knowing full well that php and security are an oxymoron)
Did you try SPIP (http://www.spip.net) ? Several big french websites use it.
Fabien
On 11/26/05 11:58, Bruno S. Delbono wrote:
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
If you are interested in a KISS approach take a look at TinyMCE, an easy to
configure JavaScript WYSIWYG(!!!) editor:
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/example_full.php?example=true
(Instantly drop a
Hello!
I use adsl, and I have direct access to internet, and I go though pf (rdr)
to dmz windows server (protocol rdp)
Our internet provider change protocol to PPPoE, I make change in pf.cont,
But now rdr did -not work :-(
That's say tcpdump
tcpdump -i tun0 port rdp
tcpdump: ve
I know carp is the way to go to provide address redundancy but I was
wondering if it's the best way to do it on one server? I've got two
interfaces and I'd like to only use one public ip address.
Is carp the way to go or is there a better way?
thanks!
On 2/25/07, Bray Mailloux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been toying with the DHCP server options but cannot seem to bring
up the process; everytime I run ps there is no dhcpd process to be found
Take a look in /etc/rc and see how the system initializes dhcpd. Are
you missing the
On Feb 25, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Bray Mailloux wrote:
I've been toying with the DHCP server options but cannot seem to
bring up the process; everytime I run ps there is no dhcpd process
to be found and no computers on my network are pulling down
addresses from the server.
My DHCPD.conf
running dhcpd
under a debugger, or when running it out of inittab on
System V
systems.
On 26 Feb 2007, at 00:45, Bray Mailloux wrote:
I've been toying with the DHCP server options but cannot seem to
bring up the process; everytime I run ps there is no dhcpd pr
On 2007 Feb 25 (Sun) at 16:45:46 -0800 (-0800), Bray Mailloux wrote:
:And my interfaces are configured as such.
:
:cat /etc/hostname.rl0 < External interface
:inet 192.168.1.2255.255.255.0 NONE
:
:cat /etc/hostname.rl1 < Internal Interface
:192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0
You
I know there is software out there to split up servers into multiple
virtual private servers (ie: partitioning) But what about the reverse?
Combine multiple physical servers to run a task with the physical
systems acting on a virtual layer as a single system.. the closest I can
come is the beowu
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering getting a Dell PowerEdge SC1420 SATA. We need a
small, cheap server for hosting some websites and email. A dual
PIII-733 generic server isn't cutting the mustard any more so it
looks like it's time to spend money.
Has anybody man
xpecting at least
> 150 mbps transfer rates and Im only geting 80. Technical support
> was knowlegable and I didn't have to wait more than 5 minutes to
> talk to someone. The informed me that this card performs best in a
> 64 bit/100 mhz slot such as a server board. IMHO
level cycle counter enabled
apm0: disconnected
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaby vanhegan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:09 PM
> To: OpenBSD general usage lis
gig raptors in RAID 0. I was expecting at least
150 mbps transfer rates and Im only geting 80. Technical support
was knowlegable and I didn't have to wait more than 5 minutes to
talk to someone. The informed me that this card performs best in a
64 bit/100 mhz slot such as a server boar
Hi
A simple question.
How to enable dns server to only make dns cache service to my LAN ?
I running OpenBSD 3.7 and with:
named_flags=""
in rc.conf.local but I have this output :
server1# dig @127.0.0.1 yahoo.com
; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> @127.0.0.1 yaho
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 07:19:18PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Hello. Basic sendmail question.
>
> I want to set up a backup mx server to field incoming mail when my
> primary mail server goes down. I understand how to do this from a DNS
> standpoint, but what I don't know is
Really? So when the box goes down, just let the mail bounce?
How would it break spamassassin (which is what I use)?
David Terrell wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 07:19:18PM -0500, Chris wrote:
>
>
>>Hello. Basic sendmail question.
>>
>>I want to set up a backup
bounces,
and my spam tools aren't broken.
I have noticed that spammers won't even bother trying to connect to
the primary, they just try the backup thinking that my primary server
will accept mail as a relay from the backup, which of course it will,
but only if that message passes spamd,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Chris wrote:
> I want to set up a backup mx server to field incoming mail when my
> primary mail server goes down. I understand how to do this from a DNS
> standpoint, but what I don't know is what should be in my
> sendmail.mc/sendmail.cf file for
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:49:44 -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 01, 2006, Chris wrote:
>
>> I want to set up a backup mx server to field incoming mail when my
>> primary mail server goes down. I understand how to do this from a DNS
>> standpoint, but what I don
>> Backup MX is a relic and a legacy. It breaks almost all spam filters.
>> Modern mail infrastructure doesn't need it, except in rare cases.
me thinks this is spreading FUD. define "modern mail infrastructure". perhaps
the origin of the FUD is the M$ visual studio .net overexposure?
On Thursday 02 March 2006 10:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> me thinks this is spreading FUD. define "modern mail infrastructure".
> perhaps the origin of the FUD is the M$ visual studio .net overexposure?
No, it's not FUD. The large majorityt domains dont need backup MX's. Mail wont
bounce just b
Although I know where David is coming from with this slightly
contentious comment, he's wrong. The argument is that most
senders will do their own back-off, and the hassle of setting
up a *good* backup MX server is so high that the benefit scarcely
justifies it.
However where he is wrong i
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 11:16:59PM -0600, Graham Toal wrote:
> Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper
> relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but
> not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
> if you do spam checking *and rejection
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:16:59 -0600, Graham Toal wrote:
>Although I know where David is coming from with this slightly
>contentious comment, he's wrong. The argument is that most
>senders will do their own back-off, and the hassle of setting
>up a *good* backup MX server is
On Thursday, March 2, "Rod.. Whitworth" wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:16:59 -0600, Graham Toal wrote:
> >
> >If your DNS is on the same net as the mailer, its down too. Senders
> >soon get no result at all when they look you up, with the result that
> >mail *bounces* (unknown address) rather tha
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:14, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> If the client can't find any DNS information on the destination, it
> tends to bounce. At least in all non-broken MTAs. Try it. Send
> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see what happens.
> This was 1/2 his argument. No DNS info means no
>>>>> "Rod" == Rod Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> As a result spammers target secondaries strongly in preference to
Rod> primaries. As a project I listed a secondary for a server I support
Rod> using an alias on the same machine. All of the
> NO - it does not! Well, not unless the sending MTA is broken. To quote
> from Postfix documentation referring to not getting an MX record from
> DNS:
> " By default, the Postfix SMTP client defers delivery and tries again
> after some delay. This behavior is required by the SMTP standard."
Yes i
> $ host -t mx stonehenge.com
> stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
> stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
>
> Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
>
> 450 Violation of RFC2821 Section 5 Paragraph 8 correlates highly with
> sp
On 2006/03/02 08:16, Graham Toal wrote:
> > Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
> >
> > 450 Violation of RFC2821 Section 5 Paragraph 8 correlates highly with
> > spamming and is therefore rejected.
>
> Ouch! You're a brave one. That's fine until your first big network
> "Graham" == Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Graham> Ouch! You're a brave one. That's fine until your first big network
outage :-)
Graham> Oh wait - I bet they're both on the same net segment, right? You
wouldn't
Graham> dare do that with a machine elsewhere on the net!
No, they
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper
> relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but
> not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
Do you know just how disturbing it is to receive
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $ host -t mx stonehenge.com
> > stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
> > stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
> >
> > Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
> >
> > 450 Viola
On 02 Mar 2006 06:54:45 -0800 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L.
Schwartz) wrote:
> I hate greylisting. It hurts legit mail to solve the spam problem.
> And I don't need it, based on the amount of spam I can kill with this
> (and a few other tricks described in the referenced paper).
If you used spa
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Graham,
>
> You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
> difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
> approach? Isn't it essentially a variation of the very same thing,
> nam
On 02/03/06, David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > Graham,
> >
> > You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
> > difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
> > approac
Wouldn't a even simpler solution be to define a
high MX record to a dummy address that would never
answer. The spammers were going to retry, they would
anyway and a real server would retry for sure.
> "Constantine" == Constantine A Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Constantine> Correction: this very neat trick is by Randal L. Schwartz; Graham
Constantine> was the one opposing it in this thread. :-)
Constantine> Here are some results of 'You Had Me at HELO':
Constantine>
http://fas.sfu
>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Wouldn't a even simpler solution be to define a
Peter> high MX record to a dummy address that would never
Peter> answer. The spammers were going to retry, they would
Peter> an
DNS located elsewhere is never harmful as long
>> as you can get it updated as fast as your master in house.
>
>scp, rsync, etc, etc. It will tend to get updated faster than the primary,
>considering you've got to edit the primiry's version by hand (usually).
It may be but it won't get done before the end of the hand
edit on the master.
~|^
==
>
>--Toby.
>
>
>From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look from up over?
Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
On Thursday 02 March 2006 09:03, you wrote:
> Really? So when the box goes down, just let the mail bounce?
Mail will not start to bounce the moment your box goes down. SMTP was designed
to be reliable.
> How would it break spamassassin (which is what I use)?
It doesn't.
---
Lars Hansson
Hi,
from previous threads in this list, I gathered that the Dell PowerEdge
SC1425 works well with OpenBSD 3.8. However, I have reservations from
past experience with Dell's customer support, hope anyone can recommend
an equivalent low-cost system with the following minimum requirements -
1) Form
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 08:31:18AM -0600, David Wilk wrote:
> I've got a test server with OpenBSD-3.8 on it (GENERIC except with
> RAIDFRAME support) and considering the hardware, it does pretty well
> with NFS performance. However, I've noticed that when under heavy NFS
> l
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 08:31:18AM -0600, David Wilk wrote:
> I've got a test server with OpenBSD-3.8 on it (GENERIC except with
> RAIDFRAME support) and considering the hardware, it does pretty well
> with NFS performance. However, I've noticed that when under heavy NFS
> l
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:47:17AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> I don't know if this has been posted before, but I found a nice openbsd server
> compatibility list:
>
> "To ensure availability of appropriate server hardware platforms for Profense,
> Armorlogic is testi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 11:47:17AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> I don't know if this has been posted before, but I found a nice openbsd server
> compatibility list:
>
> "To ensure availability of appropriate server hardware platforms for Profense,
> Armorlogic is testi
On 4/19/06, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is totally out of date for 3.9, everything except the x4200 should
> be fine.
Yes. Especially the HP hardware, since most of the problems were
caused by missing PCI bridges that should be fixed now.
As soon as I get my 3.9 CDs from Wim,
gig raptors in RAID 0. I was expecting at least
150 mbps transfer rates and Im only geting 80. Technical support
was knowlegable and I didn't have to wait more than 5 minutes to
talk to someone. The informed me that this card performs best in a
64 bit/100 mhz slot such as a server boar
Hi list,
i'm trying since a few hours to get 3.8 on a (linux-based) root-server,
without success. I googled some tutorials (for ex.
http://wiki.bsd-crew.de/index.php?title=Strato-Rootserver_mit_NetBSD&redirect=no)
but they don't seem to work (i tried it with my own bootdisk and
Hi,
I've enabled ntpd with the -d flag to run as a server on a system on the
lan with this conf file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/jross $ cat /etc/ntpd.conf
# $OpenBSD: ntpd.conf,v 1.7 2004/07/20 17:38:35 henning Exp $
# sample ntpd configuration file, see ntpd.conf(5)
# Addresses to list
Hello,
I was wondering if i could pick the brains of more experienced inividuals to
provide me with a more suited solution. I am a total beginner at this so
please bear with me.
I wish to setup a file server to sit on my networ at home and provide all
the files between a couple of pc'
Hi,
Is there anyone who works on PPPoE Server mode implementation?
Best regards, Dinar
On Saturday 19 August 2006 03:13, you wrote:
>1) Any chassis or supplier recommendations? Comments on
> "Rackmountpro", since I have found this 2U chassis from rackmountpro
> (
>http://www.rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2421 ).
I have purchased rackmount chassis from them before and been
201 - 300 of 1988 matches
Mail list logo
