Thank you for the suggestion. It seems to have fixed my issue.
I added the following to my ~/.profile with this minor correction
(closing double parenthesis):
alias chrome='ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024)); /usr/local/bin/chrome'
alias firefox='ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024)); /usr/local/bin/firefox'
Best
Are you browsers allowed enough memory?
Someone on this list once suggested putting lines like these in ~/.kshrc
# Raising the memory limits to accommodate greedy browsers 3Gb
alias chrome='(ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024); /usr/local/bin/chrome'
alias firefox='(ulimit -d $((3*1024*1024);
Hello, my systems freezes almost anytime I run
Chrome/Firefox/Qutebrowser and visit any site that contains some soft
of scripting, or if I move the mouse somewhat to fast. But I think it
is more when there is a lot of computation involved by the browser.
When the system freezes, it is
I have found that all browsers, either firefox31, or midori, or epiphany,
crash immediately under OpenBSD 5.6 with the sparc64 architecture.
They all seem to work fine with my amd64 installation. I have even tried
to compile the ports myself, which always successfully compile, but always
the
On Dec 21, 2014 10:11 AM, Richard E. Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com
wrote:
It seems that a particular c++ library is not
linking properly. Any suggestions?
Richard Thornton
Why do you think this? Can you provide an error message or stack trace?
Also what are your ulimits or login.conf
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
trustworthy than google
Why?
Because Google's stated mission is to collect all
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
trustworthy than google
Why?
Because Google's stated mission is to
El vie, 01-01-2010 a las 02:13 -0700, Theo de Raadt escribiC3:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
what's about srware iron?
Who pays for the majority of firefox's development?
On Jan 1, 2010, at 4:02 AM, Nick Guenther kou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 14:27, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
Who pays for the majority of firefox's development?
Wait, wait... don't tell me...
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 1, 2010, at 4:02 AM, Nick Guenther kou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:25, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their
Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
trustworthy than google
Why?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:39 PM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/09, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
Google are clearly clever enough to know that upsetting the 'tin-foiled'
[...]
Google also wants the browser to be
used by businesses - so there will be many features
On 12/20/09, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
Google are clearly clever enough to know that upsetting the 'tin-foiled'
geeks, by 'spying' on them would be enough to disrupt its browser.
Especially given its lowly market share, just a little bad press would
stop this thing ever taking
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:39:58PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
On 12/20/09, Robert Bronsdon reash...@gmail.com wrote:
Google are clearly clever enough to know that upsetting the 'tin-foiled'
geeks, by 'spying' on them would be enough to disrupt its browser.
Especially given its lowly market
nixlists schrieb:
I wonder what browsers they use?
lynx
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:12 PM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
it's privacy and identity leakage concerns. It's designed by
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
it's privacy and identity leakage concerns.
Privacy and Google are interesting.
Obviously it makes sense for Google to collect as much data on you
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Bob Beck wrote:
2009/12/18 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
[...]
and at the moment I haven't seen anything that works as an effective
selective javascript blocker for chrome like
ropers wrote:
Finally, if you use Adblock Plus, you owe it to yourself to also use
Element Hiding Helper.
--regards,
ropers
Wow, thank you, I've always wanted an addon like this.
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their security?
Thanks.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:25 +, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers
they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their
El 18/12/2009 20:50, Brad Tilley escribis:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:25 +, nixlistsnixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers
they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of
2009/12/18 Brad Tilley misc@openbsd.org:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:25 +, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers
they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of
PS: I don't actually know to what extent the LSO issues apply to
OpenBSD, as there is only limited Flash compatibility, but anyway.
2009/12/18 ropers rop...@gmail.com:
2009/12/18 Brad Tilley misc@openbsd.org:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:25 +, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on
firefox + adsuck
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:25:13PM +, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:25 AM, nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their security?
I send mail to a demon
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
it's privacy and identity leakage concerns. It's designed by Google
with this built-in - they want to know everything about you and
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds
All your ads are belong to us.
Max Headroom might have an opinion too.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:12:14PM +, nixlists wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their security?
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:24:25 -0800
Subject: Re: Web Browsers
From: sparcta...@gmail.com
To: ajacou...@bsdfrog.org
CC: misc@openbsd.org
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org
wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list
2009/12/18 nixlists nixmli...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
firefox + adsuck
What is your opnion on Chrome, OpenBSD gurus? Okay we all know about
it's privacy and identity leakage concerns. It's designed by Google
with this built-in -
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:25:13PM +, nixlists wrote:
Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
use?
What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
tighten their security?
38 matches
Mail list logo
