qualified" as keyword. This has some additional benefits since
invalid is rather overloaded (ovs, avs use invalid and then there is error
which is a different kind of invalid).
The routes 'bgpctl show rib invalid' displays are Loc-RIB entries which
can not be selected in the decision process because of various reasons.
--
:wq Claudio
Thanks for the rapid response and proposal.
I'd wanted to test yesterday but had to postpone.
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 12:18 PM Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Here is a possible solution where a perfect match aborts the detection
> loop. Now this only works if the labels are in the right order ("in"
> befo
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:14:43AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> > While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
> > has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out'
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:28:58AM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
> has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out' counterpart works as
> expected. Looking at bgpctl(8), the following shoul
While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out' counterpart works as
expected. Looking at bgpctl(8), the following should work (but
doesn't):
$ bgpctl show rib in neighbor $peer
ambiguo
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:48:34PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
> [OpenBSD 6.5-STABLE, up to date]
>
> When using bgpctl(8), I'm able to do almost everything I need, but I'm
> having trouble figuring out how to do one thing:
>
> How do I show routes that do NOT have a
[OpenBSD 6.5-STABLE, up to date]
When using bgpctl(8), I'm able to do almost everything I need, but I'm
having trouble figuring out how to do one thing:
How do I show routes that do NOT have a community (or ext-community, or
large-community) attribute?
The best I can come up with
;
> > "The printed numbers are the sent and received open,
> > sent and received notifications, sent and received
> > updates, sent and received keepalives, and sent and
> > received route refresh messages plus the current and
> > maximum prefix count, the number o
s, sent and received
> updates, sent and received keepalives, and sent and
> received route refresh messages plus the current and
> maximum prefix count, the number of sent and received
> updates, and withdraws."
>
> But bgpctl sho ri nei outputs 16 numbers, not 1
ent and received notifications, sent and received
> updates, sent and received keepalives, and sent and
> received route refresh messages plus the current and
> maximum prefix count, the number of sent and received
> updates, and withdraws."
>
> But bgpctl sho ri nei output
nt and
received route refresh messages plus the current and
maximum prefix count, the number of sent and received
updates, and withdraws."
But bgpctl sho ri nei outputs 16 numbers, not 15 ?
Any clues ?
Rachel
Hello,
Does anyone know a way to view the label stack of VPNv4 routes learned via
MP-BGP?
I am currently running a POC of trying out OpenBSD as a Virtual MPLS PE for
some of our hosted tenants, and was finding some issues routing to certain
prefixes via MPLS because packets were being sent to an i
t;
spam_rs2="217.31.80.170"
spam_asn="65066"
AS 65500
fib-update no
nexthop qualify via default
group "spam-bgp" {
remote-as $spam_asn
multihop 64
export none
neighbor $spam_rs1
neighbor $spam_rs2
}
match from group "spam-bgp" community
spam-bgp" {
> :remote-as $spam_asn
> :multihop 64
> :export none
> :neighbor $spam_rs1
> :neighbor $spam_rs2
> :}
> :
> :match from group "spam-bgp" community $spam_asn:42 set pftable
> "bgp_spamd_bypass"
> :match from group "
am_rs1
:neighbor $spam_rs2
:}
:
:match from group "spam-bgp" community $spam_asn:42 set pftable
"bgp_spamd_bypass"
:match from group "spam-bgp" community $spam_asn:666 set pftable "bgp_spamd"
:elisheva:~$ bgpctl show
:Neighbor ASMsgR
00
fib-update no
group "spam-bgp" {
remote-as $spam_asn
multihop 64
export none
neighbor $spam_rs1
neighbor $spam_rs2
}
match from group "spam-bgp" community $spam_asn:42 set pftable
"bgp_spamd_bypass"
match from group "spam-bgp" communi
imes
> this takes a while. I would prefer if we could leave that out.
>
Here is a new diff that only prints uptime.
Denis
Index: bgpctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpctl/bgpctl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.187
diff -u -p -r1.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:09:50PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
> with the diff. What I don't like is the inclusion of the number of
> prefixes. That count requires a roundtrip to the RDE to find and sometimes
> this takes a wh
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:50:09AM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
> sum", no?
>
The idea of terse is that you don't need to parse. So in a way I agree
with the diff. What I don't like is t
If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
sum", no?
/Benno
Denis Fondras(open...@ledeuns.net) on 2016.04.17 18:09:18 +0200:
> Hello,
>
> When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number
> of
> prefixes. Here
> If you do that, then you can also just parse the output of "bgpctl show
> sum", no?
>
Of course but I would have to parse day/hour/minute/second. It is simpler if
bgpd can give me the value straight.
Denis
Hello,
When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number of
prefixes. Here is a patch that add these informations to "bgpctl show sum
terse"
Before :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 Established
After :
# bgpctl show sum terse
10.20.30.254 65003 E
bgpctl show rib nei out
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Adam Thompson
wrote:
> Is there any functionality in bgpctl(8) that will show me precisely what
> I'm advertising to a neighbor?
> If not, is there any easier way - assuming I don't have access to my
> neighbor&#x
Is there any functionality in bgpctl(8) that will show me precisely what
I'm advertising to a neighbor?
If not, is there any easier way - assuming I don't have access to my
neighbor's router, and they don't run a looking-glass - to find that
out, short of packet sniffing?
Hi Denis,
Denis Fondras wrote on Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 06:53:07PM +0200:
> I noticed bgpctl manpage has some duplicate information :
Thanks, committed.
I removed the first copies though and not the second as you proposed
in order to preserve alphabetic ordering.
Yours,
Ingo
> --- bg
Hi,
I noticed bgpctl manpage has some duplicate information :
--- bgpctl.8.orig Thu Aug 14 18:46:21 2014
+++ bgpctl.8Thu Aug 14 18:46:41 2014
@@ -359,12 +359,6 @@
Multiple options can be used at the same time and the
.Ar neighbor
filter can be combined with other filters.
-.It Cm
Hi Claudio,
> You most probably run with softreconf in and therefore there is to prefix
> entries for each path.
>
This is it, disabling soft-reconfiguration lowers memory usage.
Thank you very much for this accurate answer :)
Denis
sent by a peer, even invalid ones ?
>
> I know of "bgpctl show rib" but I'd like to understand what this line
> means : "27808 prefix entries using 869K of memory"
>
> For me it looks like half of the prefixes I receive are invalid (in
> memory bu not i
On 2013-09-22, Denis Fondras wrote:
> Thank you very much Stuart.
>
>>
>> The most likely reasons are invalid nexthops ("bgpctl sh nex") or
>> that the paths are dropped by your filter rules.
>>
>
> I have no explicit filter rules in bgpd.conf a
Thank you very much Stuart.
>
> The most likely reasons are invalid nexthops ("bgpctl sh nex") or
> that the paths are dropped by your filter rules.
>
I have no explicit filter rules in bgpd.conf and "bgpctl sh nex" shows
only valid nexthops.
I restarted the
id ones ?
IIRC there isn't..
> I know of "bgpctl show rib" but I'd like to understand what this line
> means : "27808 prefix entries using 869K of memory"
>
> For me it looks like half of the prefixes I receive are invalid (in
> memory bu not in RIB) an
Hello,
I have an OpenBGPd router with OpenBSD5.3, peering with two remote
routers (one for v4 and one for v6). I expect my peers to send me only
valid routes.
Is there a way to show every prefixes sent by a peer, even invalid ones ?
I know of "bgpctl show rib" but I'd like to
* Gregory Edigarov [2012-02-22 09:08]:
> How about having something like "explain " command for bgpctl?
> If given it should pass the prefix through the bgp path selection
> algorithm showing WHY this or another path was selected.
> I mean one can always follow the 13 st
Hello misc@,
How about having something like "explain " command for bgpctl?
If given it should pass the prefix through the bgp path selection
algorithm showing WHY this or another path was selected.
I mean one can always follow the 13 steps in the mind, but I would
prefer having th
6 set { localpref 200
> origin igp nexthop blackhole }
>
>
> Looking exclusively at the bgpctl output makes it appear to be not
> working (186.4.134.249 is a blocked source, 10.171.0.66 is the router
> triggering the blackhole, it should NOT be the nexthop):
>
> # bgpctl show
P-IBGP community 1234:666 set { localpref 200
> origin igp nexthop blackhole }
>
>
> Looking exclusively at the bgpctl output makes it appear to be not
> working (186.4.134.249 is a blocked source, 10.171.0.66 is the router
> triggering the blackhole, it should NOT be the nex
exclusively at the bgpctl output makes it appear to be not
working (186.4.134.249 is a blocked source, 10.171.0.66 is the router
triggering the blackhole, it should NOT be the nexthop):
# bgpctl show ip bgp detail 186.4.134.249
BGP routing table entry for 186.4.134.249/32
Nexthop 10.171.0.66 (via
> > > with the filter "allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200".
> > > If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
> > > that.
> > >
> > >
> > To show a bug in bgpctl/bgpd (or where ever it may
.200".
> > If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
> > that.
> >
> >
> To show a bug in bgpctl/bgpd (or where ever it may be).
> Dont you want to be able to trust the information bgpctl gives you ?
>
Yes there is a bug in b
bgpd to do
> that.
>
>
To show a bug in bgpctl/bgpd (or where ever it may be).
Dont you want to be able to trust the information bgpctl gives you ?
Regards Tony
thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the config...
>>
>>
> You are missing the point, completely.
> bgpctl show rib out displays incorrect information.
>
> Regards Tony
nexthop self in the config...
>
>
You are missing the point, completely.
bgpctl show rib out displays incorrect information.
Regards Tony
Hi
Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
> Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
> show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the config...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
> Tony Sarendal a icrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> > current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
> > AS 65001
> > network 10.0.1.0/24
> >
> > current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1
Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
Tony Sarendal a C)crit :
Hi,
> current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
> AS 65001
> network 10.0.1.0/24
>
> current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
> flags: * = Valid, > = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
> origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ?
>flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
>AI*>
10.0.1.0/24 172.29.1.200 100 0 i
>current1#
What is
incorrect on this ?
current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
AS 65001
network 10.0.1.0/24
neighbor 172.29.1.52 {
remote-as 65001
set nexthop self
descr "current2"
local-address 172.29.1.51
}
allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200
allow to any
allow from any
current1# b
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 08:54:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >> On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> >>> Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-ti
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>>> Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
>>> asdot format?
>>
>> Not at present, O
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>> Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
>> asdot format?
>
> Not at present, OpenBGP only accepts as-plain for input, it always
> outputs as-do
On 2011-05-27, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
> asdot format?
Not at present, OpenBGP only accepts as-plain for input, it always
outputs as-dot.
I think we should probably change this, rfc5396 came out a couple
of years ago and
Is there a way bgpctl will produce run-time information not using
asdot format? I am trying to convert my OpenBGP conf to RPSL but the
later is old enough that wont accept as-dot format, therefore I need
it in 4-byte ASN notation.
Thanks.
--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: dudu.me
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 06:14:10PM +0700, leonardo fabian wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> After fixing error in bgpd.conf (OpenBSD 4.6),
> bgpctl reload, refuse to load new configuration.
> from /var/log/messages:
>
> Jan 27 06:55:43 acbgp bgpd[31029]: /etc/bgpd.conf:114: rib
&g
Hi misc,
After fixing error in bgpd.conf (OpenBSD 4.6),
bgpctl reload, refuse to load new configuration.
from /var/log/messages:
Jan 27 06:55:43 acbgp bgpd[31029]: /etc/bgpd.conf:114: rib
"Adj-RIB-In" allready exists.
Jan 27 06:55:43 acbgp bgpd[31029]: /etc/bgpd.conf:114: rib "Lo
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:24:06PM -0700, Greg Skinner wrote:
> Seems like given this RIB entry:
>
> % ./bgpctl show rib detail 10.0.0.0
> BGP routing table entry for 10.0.0.0/24
> 1.0
> Nexthop 192.168.219.19 (via 192.168.219.19) from test (192.168.0.1)
>
Seems like given this RIB entry:
% ./bgpctl show rib detail 10.0.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 10.0.0.0/24
1.0
Nexthop 192.168.219.19 (via 192.168.219.19) from test (192.168.0.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, external, valid, best
Last update: 03:20:38 ago
Communities
rent "now" that certain commands through bgpctl seem to just
> > > hang .. (we've tried this with various snapshots every 2 weeks or so
> > > since January) as well as trying a full build.
> > >
> > > If I do a bgpctl reload (100+ peers per product
Greetings,
I am looking for a way to add/subtract a single
community from the rib via the bgpctl command, or some other
accepted real-time user-level path, without re-specifying
the whole community attribute set for that route.
The goal is to be able to add a community on
On 12 Mar 2007, at 10:31, Claudio Jeker wrote:
... and here is the patch to fix the issue.
Yup does indeed seem to have solved the problem!
Thanks Claudio / guys!
--
Jon Morby
FidoNet Registration Services Ltd
tel: 0845 004 3050 / fax: 0845 004 3051
web: http://www.fido.net/
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:14:29AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:43:03PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
> > I've noticed since updating to current from 4.0-current in January to
> > -current "now" that certain commands through bgpctl seem to j
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:43:03PM +, Jon Morby wrote:
> I've noticed since updating to current from 4.0-current in January to
> -current "now" that certain commands through bgpctl seem to just
> hang .. (we've tried this with various snapshots every 2 week
* Jon Morby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-12 01:49]:
> I've noticed since updating to current from 4.0-current in January to
> -current "now" that certain commands through bgpctl seem to just
> hang .. (we've tried this with various snapshots every 2 weeks
I've noticed since updating to current from 4.0-current in January to
-current "now" that certain commands through bgpctl seem to just
hang .. (we've tried this with various snapshots every 2 weeks or so
since January) as well as trying a full build.
If I do a bgpctl re
; ? Is there one?
> Is there any planned?
bgpctl show rib empty-as
might give you what you're after - it is not really what you asked for
tho.
there is no direct equivalent, we should probably add one...
> Also seeing recived routes from each peer using bgpctl could be useful.
> Is
parser but that is very
cumbersome to use, especially if you are logging to a remote computer/
dont have a disk in the computer running openbgpd.
Also seeing recived routes from each peer using bgpctl could be useful.
Is there support for soft-reconfiguration in the pipeline, or is this
not very
information
from bgpctl are sorely needed.
I also ran into the problem with multiple communities but I haven't
had time to look closer at it. Have you seen any changes in bgpd since
you tried -current ?
I was going to give it a go tonight if I manage to stay awake.
/Tony
Not been any
On 06/09/05, Karl Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tony sarendal wrote:
>
> >I've started to test bgpd to see if I can use if for a future project.
> >Are there any plans to make bgpctl show communities, originator-id and
> >cluster-list ?
> >
>
Agreed! Soft-reset would be awesome and more functionality from bgpctl
wouldn't hurt. As is though I like the output style from bgpctl since it
keeps things concise.
Regards,
Joe
On 9/6/05, Karl Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tony sarendal wrote:
>
> >I've s
tony sarendal wrote:
I've started to test bgpd to see if I can use if for a future project.
Are there any plans to make bgpctl show communities, originator-id and
cluster-list ?
Any plans of adding route-refresh to bgpctl ? Something like "bgpctl
nei clear (in|out)" ?
Althou
I've started to test bgpd to see if I can use if for a future project.
Are there any plans to make bgpctl show communities, originator-id and
cluster-list ?
Any plans of adding route-refresh to bgpctl ? Something like "bgpctl
nei clear (in|out)" ?
Although I miss a few featur
70 matches
Mail list logo
