Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository to github?
On 2016-08-07 14.44.58 +0200, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote:
> Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
> Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository to github?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=134408828426309&w=2
Thanks.
Original message From: Mike Burns
Date: 8/7/16 14:51 (GMT+01:00) To: Dariusz
Sendkowski Cc: misc Subject: Re:
github
On 2016-08-07 14.44.58 +0200, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote:
> Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
> Do you ha
Hi,
Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:44:58PM +0200:
> Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
As one of the OpenBSD developers, i don't know and frankly i don't
care. You certainly shouldn't trust it in any way.
Personally,
On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository
> > to github?
>
> Absolutely not. The OpenBSD repository will remain secure and
> will not be outsourced to a random third party.
I'm sorry, are we talking
> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300
> From: con...@gmx.com
> To:
misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: github
>
> On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze
wrote:
>>> Do you have any plans to move the OpenBSD source code repository
>>> to github?
>>
>> Ab
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:17:21AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300
> > From: con...@gmx.com
> > To:
> misc@openbsd.org
> > Subject: Re: github
> >
>
> And github offers two-factor authentication, so if enabled, not simp
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300
>> From: con...@gmx.com
>> To:
> misc@openbsd.org
>> Subject: Re: github
>>
>> On 16:43 Sun 07 Aug, Ingo Schwarze
> wrote:
>>>> Do you have any pl
On 10:35 Sun 07 Aug, Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 11:17:21AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +0300
> > > From: con...@gmx.com
> > > To:
> > misc@openbsd.org
> > > Subject: Re: github
> > >
&g
u make a commit to the OpenBSD CVS tree?
Anything would do. Just find a file that has spaces where it should have
tabs. Commit your diff. Once you do that, I think all of the developers
will be easily convinced to move to Github.
gt;
> OK, you win.
>
> Would you do me a favor first.
> Before this big move, could you make a commit to the OpenBSD CVS tree?
> Anything would do. Just find a file that has spaces where it should have
> tabs. Commit your diff. Once you do that, I think all of the developers
> will be easily convinced to move to Github.
Err... What?
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
Dariusz Sendkowski wrote on Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:44:58PM +0200:
Is this https://github.com/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
As one of the OpenBSD developers, i don't know and frankly i don't
care. You certainly shouldn't trust it in any
d have
>> tabs. Commit your diff. Once you do that, I think all of the developers
>> will be easily convinced to move to Github.
>
> Err... What?
>
You are talking big while not contributing to the project.
--
Cordialement, Coues Ludovic
+336 148 743 42
a commit to the OpenBSD CVS tree?
> >> Anything would do. Just find a file that has spaces where it should have
> >> tabs. Commit your diff. Once you do that, I think all of the developers
> >> will be easily convinced to move to Github.
> >
> > Err... What?
>From all discussions:
1) a solution looking for a problem
2) the problems github tries to address are not considered urgent nor
important problems by OpenBSD developers
3) migration cost/benefit is not worth it - and using 2 different methods
of VC take away focus from the team".
On S
u do me a favor first.
> > >> Before this big move, could you make a commit to the OpenBSD CVS tree?
> > >> Anything would do. Just find a file that has spaces where it should have
> > >> tabs. Commit your diff. Once you do that, I think all of the developers
> &g
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation.
>
> Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there?
Yes.
This thread has been informative to me.
Forget the silly move from CVS part, never was an issue.
I did
2016-08-07 18:42 GMT+02:00 Chris Bennett <
chrisbenn...@bennettconstruction.us>:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:06:56AM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> > whereas on GitHub it would belong to a corporation.
> >
> > Doesn't that simply end the discussion right there?
OpenBSD is using CVS solely, but for my own purposes I started to
mirror src to github recently using cvs2gitdump tool. I do this since
I find git log/git show more friendly than CVS provided tools... If
you are interested see https://github.com/kgardas/openbsd-src --
CAVEAT! Do not trust the
On 08/07/16 08:44, Dariusz Sendkowski wrote:
> Is this http://[bullshit deleted]/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
I find this part terrifying.
Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official. So
you just assumed that the seven letters, "openbsd",
Nick Holland, 07 Aug 2016 23:36:
> > Is this http://[bullshit deleted]/openbsd the official OpenBSD github site?
>
> I find this part terrifying.
>
> Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official. So
> you just assumed that the seven letters, &qu
On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:42 +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> [...] another low friction and low time investment approach could
> have been to proactively take these usernames/urls and put
> placeholders or links to the official project site.
Why should the project do put up links on its site for any
Karel Gardas [gard...@gmail.com] wrote:
> OpenBSD is using CVS solely, but for my own purposes I started to
> mirror src to github recently using cvs2gitdump tool. I do this since
> I find git log/git show more friendly than CVS provided tools... If
> you are interested see https:
Nick Holland wrote:
>Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official.
It does on this page: https://www.openbsd.org/libressl/. Its even
above the cvs link. Of course this is just for libressl not for the
rest of openbsd.
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:56:30 -0700
David Schmidt wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
> >Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything
> >official.
>
> It does on this page: https://www.openbsd.org/libressl/. Its even
> above the cvs link. Of course this is just
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:56 PM, David Schmidt
wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
> >Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official.
>
> It does on this page: https://www.openbsd.org/libressl/. Its even
> above the cvs link. Of course this is just for libressl not
hi, dears.
recently, I get the email by friends
it says Github has openbsd_hammer2fs and makefs.
Is that means. It will be "The OpenBSD can use The Modern journaling file
system".
The OpenBSD could be include "openbsd_hammer2fs" in default system?
(I know "goog
Hey!
Guys, what do you think about putting OpenBSD on GitHub? I see you guys
already have an account there so I just thought I'd ask:
https://github.com/openbsd
Will it attract more followers? Will it make life easier for developers?
Personally I'd love to make a fork and contribute
x27;s mail for a few
examples).
Most importantly, unused branches have to be deleted from the server,
people have to work and develop in "master", and arbitrary experiments
do not belong on the shared remote, unless they are important or
intereting for others. If people do not test th
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to develop web apps on OpenBSD but Github and even Bitbucket
seems to think that only Windows and/or Linux are the platforms so I feel
forced to use VS Code that runs only on those systems.
Can somebody please point me to alternative free online code repository
ser
There are lots of projects on Github. Sometimes, they have the word
"openbsd" in the title or README. Those are added by the author.
Any discussion about inclusion in OpenBSD will happen on the OpenBSD
mailing lists, and most certainly not in any github project, pr, issue,
or whatever
On 2023-08-22, dues_openbsd wrote:
> hi, dears.
> recently, I get the email by friends
> it says Github has openbsd_hammer2fs and makefs.
yes, seen that in january. kusumi (who is working on hammer2 in
dragonfly and has accounts there+netbsd) has diffs for *read-only*
hammer2 on freeb
No.
This has been discussed many times before, and we have no interest in
this.
On 2012 Aug 04 (Sat) at 15:43:37 +0200 (+0200), Tony wrote:
:Hey!
:
:Guys, what do you think about putting OpenBSD on GitHub? I see you guys
:already have an account there so I just thought I'd ask:
:
You don't have to ask permission to anyone to do whatever you want
with the OpenBSD code. If you can create a github account that
reliably mirror OpenBSD's commits, I think some people would be
interested.
For what is worth, there is already a git repository that follows
Ope
t the moment.
2012/8/4 Luis Useche :
> You don't have to ask permission to anyone to do whatever you want
> with the OpenBSD code. If you can create a github account that
> reliably mirror OpenBSD's commits, I think some people would be
> interested.
>
> For what
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
> Also, diffs from git has proven to not apply cleanly at times (for
> reasons unknown to me), so whatever you hope the versioning tool will
> let you do, don't forget to make sure any contributions do apply.
Well, git just has a dif
for a lot of my local development too, but CVS is going to
remain OpenBSD's Single Source of Truth for the foreseeable future.
Using github pull requests just means passing the buck in terms of
who's responsible for actually getting the diff into CVS.
On 2012-08-04, Tony wrote:
> Personally I'd love to make a fork and contribute back a ton of pull
> requests, mostly on the documentation side though.
No need for all this complication of exporting/syncing between
the version control system used by OpenBSD and another one for work
directories - j
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 07:05:38PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Well, git just has a different set of bugs than cvs.
...
> I would deem cvs MORE painful than git on average, it's just that
> we're more accustomed to the pain...
Yes, this is right. And also there would be a price to pay in lost
produ
ult, which is good. It means fewer private forks. If every
developer could maintain a branch with some private tweaks, and not
bother integrating their changes or fixing regressions, progress would
grind to a halt. [I have mentioned this to people before and their
eyes just about popped out of t
ferred by pretty much all of the sensible people I know, and
OpenBSD culture clearly prefers/demands them. I'd be surprised if giving
people sharper tools would do much harm.
> github is all about social coding and they have a point. But many
> of the things they enable are considered ant
who rely on the trunk.
Eventually they learn to rely on their own safer branches and only
update once in a while when the trunk is safe. Do you see where this
is going? Incredible division of labour when it comes to testing.
And who eventually gets burned the most by this? The release
engineer.
ts of random hex numbers that one
should revert, merge with or sacrifice chickens over if one could
only find the appropriate repository.
OK, one experience but it left an indelible impression. :-)
I think git gives you a lot of rope. Which people use to hang
themselves (and others!) as often as
s ever done.
I won't vouch for what unsensible people do. Of the various ways I've
seen people do things, "trunk is reliable" works the best by a long shot
in my experience. You can do the "trunk is gee whiz cutting edge" with
CVS, too. We've both seen projects do
Well, I have an actual list of advantages that git may offer:
- better patch/diff handling capabilities. CVS is very crappy at that.
As soon as you are testing stuff locally, every update request will produce
conflicts. git has very good merging capabilities, comparatively.
- possibility to hav
sing patches to avoid merges is the holy grail of git. Cherry-picking
the most interesting commits on top of this functionality is even more
awesome. Ok, back to the original question...
Having an up-to-date git read-only mirror (on github, or where ever it's hip
to put it) would be nice. I really
king
> the most interesting commits on top of this functionality is even more
> awesome. Ok, back to the original question...
>
> Having an up-to-date git read-only mirror (on github, or where ever it's
hip
> to put it) would be nice. I really don't mind the hipster crowd t
> git sucks. mercurial ruleZ, i want a mercurial mirror.
> And python in base... and some icecream.
>
python and mercurial sucks both. Both have nothing to do with true UNIX
heritage. Use Ubuntu
Tito Mari Francis Escaño wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm trying to develop web apps on OpenBSD but Github and even Bitbucket
> seems to think that only Windows and/or Linux are the platforms so I feel
> forced to use VS Code that runs only on those systems.
> Can somebod
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:07:49PM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Escaño wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I'm trying to develop web apps on OpenBSD but Github and even Bitbucket
> seems to think that only Windows and/or Linux are the platforms so I feel
> forced to use VS Code that runs only
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:07:49PM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Escaño said:
> I'm trying to develop web apps on OpenBSD but Github and even Bitbucket
> seems to think that only Windows and/or Linux are the platforms so I feel
> forced to use VS Code that runs only on those systems.
git
Hello everyone,
Today I received comunication that my Github account "needs" 2FA authentication
before 12th October 2023.
Since today powers and financial interests will be able to block me access to
the Github platform by their discrection. All ready for that?
My reccomandat
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 08:40:38PM +0200, Daniele B. wrote:
> Since today powers and financial interests will be able to block me
> access to the Github platform by their discrection. All ready for
> that?
Yes, Firefox from ports seems to handle Yubikey 2FA just fine.
Best regar
On 2023-08-29, Daniele B. wrote:
> Today I received comunication that my Github account "needs" 2FA
> authentication before 12th October 2023.
you can use a fido key, or you can use totp (which doesn't need any
hardware if you don't care about storing the key in an
Finally I activated a couple of 2FA options on my Github account including
the app authentication, for helping I include also the link of the app link I'm
just checking out
(2FAS app https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.twofasapp)
Thinking this one as the least losing solution.
On 2023年08月30日 19:35, the silly Daniele B. claimed to have said:
> Finally I activated a couple of 2FA options on my Github account
Imagine entrusting Microsoft with your source code lol.
--
lain.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 08:59:46AM +0900, lain. wrote:
> On 2023年08月30日 19:35, the silly Daniele B. claimed to have said:
> > Finally I activated a couple of 2FA options on my Github account
>
> Imagine entrusting Microsoft with your source code lol.
You may make as many jokes abo
;
> 1. http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html
>
I don't consider that to be the same thing.
If you donate, you don't pull any strings, and you're not part of the
decission making process, you are if you sponsor or god forbid, invest
though.
Microsoft outright owns Github itself, it acq
Aug 31, 2023 04:02:56 Kastus Shchuka :
>
> You may make as many jokes about Microsoft as you want, but please
> remember that Microsoft Corporation has been gold or silver donor
> of the OpenBSD Foundation for the past 7 years [1]
>
> 1. http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html
Now d
I have been an expat in China for five long years, I know perfectly what does
it mean
software serving "power and big financial interests" and this should remain in
the meaning
of this thread when it about 2FA auth serving Github.
-- Daniele Bonini
Aug 31, 2023 04:32:36 lain. :
>
NB: forjo -> forgejo
Anyone has experienced Gitee? Any feedback?
-- Daniele Bonini
Firstly, sorry if this is a bit off-topic for the list.
The openbsd repo in github is outdated. Are the owners reading the list?
Can someone update the repo?. Github doesn't show me a contact address for
the "organization", so I thing this list is the best option for repor
Do not use it, the import tool is broken.
On 2012-01-13, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
> Firstly, sorry if this is a bit off-topic for the list.
>
> The openbsd repo in github is outdated. Are the owners reading the list?
> Can someone update the repo?. Github doesn
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:37:49 +0100, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
Do not use it, the import tool is broken.
OK. Thanks.
--
Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
> The openbsd repo in github is outdated. Are the owners reading the
> list? Can someone update the repo?. Github doesn't show me a contact
> address for the "organization", so I thing this list is the best
> option for report the problem.
the cvs-to-git conversi
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:46:50 +0100, joshua stein wrote:
The openbsd repo in github is outdated. Are the owners reading the
list? Can someone update the repo?. Github doesn't show me a contact
address for the "organization", so I thing this list is the best
option for report the
Hi,
"(NOTE: OpenBSD can not be re-exported from the US once it has entered
the US. Because of this, take care NOT to get the distribution from
a mirror server in the US if you are outside of Canada and the US.)"
I am not in US/Canada. So is it okay to get OpenBSD source from GitHub?
from **any
version control software** server located in the USA"
That would include github.com
so is using the combination (OpenBSD, GitHub, India) uncool (gulp
illegal)?
If illegal, this kind of sucks for me and my intern.
May be someone experienced in these matters could confirm/deny?
Thanks,
Dinesh
nc server to any version control software server, we
> get:
>
> "if you are outside the USA or Canada, you should not fetch the
> cryptographic sections of the OpenBSD sources from **any
> version control software** server located in the USA"
>
> That would include gi
> Just use cvs from a mirror outisde the US? You don't *need* to use
> github, github is a copy anyway and only cvs is authorative.
>
> -Otto
Otto,
Thanks.
I was trying to distribute a tweaked OpenBSD to teachers and students in
India, so they could compile kernel, b
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 05:19:54PM +0530, Dinesh Thirumurthy wrote:
>
> > Just use cvs from a mirror outisde the US? You don't *need* to use
> > github, github is a copy anyway and only cvs is authorative.
> >
> > -Otto
>
> Otto,
>
> Thanks
Stephan,
Thank you.
> Note that openbsd's github conversion is not considered stable yet.
I was using github.com because it is (ahem) more palatable. :-)
So, it should be a hit with students.
> Which means all commit hashes could change at any time. Regardless
> of the crypto e
On 2017-12-23, Dinesh Thirumurthy wrote:
> Stephan,
>
> Thank you.
>
>> Note that openbsd's github conversion is not considered stable yet.
>
> I was using github.com because it is (ahem) more palatable. :-)
> So, it should be a hit with students.
>
>> W
Stuart,
> The conversion on github is done with cvs2gitdump.
Thanks very much. I will try this.
> For git-cvs here's a snip from the mail I wrote Uwe back in 2015:
>
> << When an update is committed to a file that was previously imported,
> the import is sh
74 matches
Mail list logo
