Re: could not read symbols File truncated

2005-10-11 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Ted Unangst wrote: sounds like the file got truncated. reinstall the full version. That's the first thing I did, actually. I totally reinstalled x.org from the latest snapshot tarballs. Note that I can reproduce this on another box with a different snapshot/architecture. Thanks for the

An error on the website

2005-10-11 Thread Rico
Hi, There seems to be an error on the website: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/faq.html It is not possible to load the gzip'd tar of 3.5 up until current. Friendly, Rico

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:09:39PM -0500, J Moore wrote: I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it appears to be the cheapest way to go. I don't desire to become an expert on RAID, I don't want

Re: Compatibility question for the New Sun X4100 server with 4FastEthernet as possible BGP routers, or stick with HP DL-145 G2?

2005-10-11 Thread Sam Vaughan
I just came across an interesting white paper with lots more detail: http://www.computerworld.com/x64/pdfs/ Sun_Fire_X4100_and_4200_WP_v14.pdf Sam

SCSI HBA support questions

2005-10-11 Thread Travis H.
Can anyone confirm that an Adaptec AHA-1542 works with anything since 3.6? I found that support for it was silently broken sometime in 3.x, even though it's listed as supported hardware for x86. Also, I have 3 PCI Bustek adapters (BT-958D, BT-958, BT-946C) in a different machine, but booting up

Re: SCSI HBA support questions

2005-10-11 Thread Miod Vallat
Can anyone confirm that an Adaptec AHA-1542 works with anything since 3.6? I found that support for it was silently broken sometime in 3.x, even though it's listed as supported hardware for x86. I'm afraid the driver does not work, unless your machine has 16MB of memory (or less). Fixing this

Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard

2005-10-11 Thread Marcin Wilk
misc@openbsd.org Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard Hello I noticed it with OpenBSD 3.4 it didn't change up to 3.7. I didn't report that because i din't use sound so much before 3.7. Now i'm using OBSD much more so sound start to be important for me:) First of all, the audio play too fast. I

Re: Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard

2005-10-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 11 October 2005 12:21 +0200, Marcin Wilk wrote: Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard Can anyone suggest some solution for me please ? http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-01/0764.html

isakmpd.conf multinet question

2005-10-11 Thread Runo Forrisdahl
Hi, currently I have a VPN consisting of this: (..snip..) [tunnel-opengw-cisco] Phase= 2 ISAKMP-peer=cisco Configuration= quick-mode Local-ID= net-opengw Remote-ID= net-remote (..snip..) Can I add a second net to the remote end

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread Nick Holland
Rod.. Whitworth wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:09:39 -0500, J Moore wrote: I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it appears to be the cheapest way to go. I don't desire to become an expert on

Re: isakmpd.conf multinet question

2005-10-11 Thread Ryan Puckett
I did it by specifying each net-to-net connection. I need to look at the new 3.8 Ipsec tools to see if I can clean this up. Another example (and the one I initially referenced) can be found in /usr/share/ipsec/isakmpd/VPN-3way-template.conf . (isakmpd via OBSD 3.6): [Phase 1] 1.2.3.4=

audio problem with latest macppc snapshot

2005-10-11 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hi, I'm running 3.8-current under macppc and since the last snapshot I experience a strange problem. Basically, after some random time (usually after 5 or 10 minutes playing audio), my sound stops working. Each time I try to listen to an audio file after that, I get a scratch noise then no

Re: OpenBSD Metastore: update

2005-10-11 Thread Luca Losio
Szechuan Death wrote: The MetaStore has been updated - comments are now enabled, you can post comments under each item listed. Drivers for hardware are also listed. Some other categories have been added, and some other stuff has changed in the background. Also, some new items have been

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, J Moore wrote: I want to set up an OBSD box as a file server for some Windoze boxes. I think a RAID 1 setup will provide sufficient reliability - and it appears to be the cheapest way to go. Yep, do it all the time. One of the disks craps out... an alarm goes off... I

Re: pf and altq group interface ...

2005-10-11 Thread Jason Crawford
Unless things have changed since I last asked this same question, interface groups don't work in altq. Next time search the archives. Jason On 10/10/05, Karl-Heinz Wild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maybe i've missed something. ifconfig rl0 group wan_if pf.conf: - altq on wan_if cbq bandwidth

add wireless router using openbsd-3.8 (i386)

2005-10-11 Thread man Chan
Hello, I recently tried to setup a wireless AP machine using openbsd-3.8 (i386) without any luck. I tried to search the google to find out the way to solve my problem with no success. Can anyone show me the direction to do it ? Thanks for your time . clarence ps. 1. the hardware is Dlink

ppp connect problem - Change route failed: errno: Network is unreachable

2005-10-11 Thread tom ryan
Hi, ppp does connect, over my bridging dsl router, but it drops the connection after approx 20 seconds. I think the important log entry is this: tun0: Warning: 0.0.0.0/0: Change route failed: errno: Network is unreachable I tried with and without my regular ppp.linkup so I'm sure it's

very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Andrew Atrens
Hey guys! I'm running 3.7 and am getting really, really crappy usb throughput :( - # dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/dev/null bs=819200 count=100 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 8192 bytes transferred in 175.970 secs (465533 bytes/sec) Here's an excerpt from my dmesg - uhci0 at pci0 dev 29

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Marco Peereboom
Yes dumb. Where are the whole dmesg? If you had sent them we could have told you if you ran into the hlt hlt bug. On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:20:45PM -0400, Andrew Atrens wrote: Hey guys! I'm running 3.7 and am getting really, really crappy usb throughput :( - # dd if=/dev/sd0c

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Jason Dixon
On Oct 11, 2005, at 11:15 AM, David Elze wrote: Hi, I'm trying to block p2p traffic via pf on OpenBSD 3.x. Unfortunately, all new p2p-clients are able to use dynamic ports or even (ab-)use http-ports etc. so blocking well known p2p-ports is not enough.

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Andrew Atrens
Just for fun I ran 'top' during the said slow transfer, and it says - load averages: 0.55, 0.20, 0.12 11:41:59 22 processes: 21 idle, 1 on processor CPU states: 0.2% user, 0.0% nice, 0.2% system, 0.8% interrupt, 98.9% idle Memory: Real:

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 11 October 2005 12:39 -0400, Andrew Atrens wrote: Can someone point me to the cvs commit that fixes 'hlt hlt'. I'm thinking (hoping) it could easily be applied on top of 3.7 Release. google hlt hlt openbsd gives this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvsm=111859519015510w=2

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Jason Dixon wrote: On Oct 11, 2005, at 11:15 AM, David Elze wrote: Hi, I'm trying to block p2p traffic via pf on OpenBSD 3.x. Unfortunately, all new p2p-clients are able to use dynamic ports or even (ab-)use http-ports etc. so blocking well known p2p-ports is

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 11 October 2005 17:15 +0200, David Elze wrote: Apart from blocking ports I just see two possibilities: [..] You might investigate how many source states users would normally use for permitted protocols, how many states are involved with non-permitted use, and (ab?)use max-src-states

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:30:30 -0400 Andrew Atrens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marco Peereboom wrote: Yes dumb. Where are the whole dmesg? haha! If you had sent them we could have told you if you ran into the hlt hlt bug. Sure here it is - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Cards/chips supporting hostap mode

2005-10-11 Thread Steve B
I'm trying to find what wireless PCI cards or chipsets support hostap mode. The Prism 2/2.5/3 is referenced everywhere. Is that that the only one or do any of the others such as Atheros support hostap mode?

Little log advice needed

2005-10-11 Thread James Mackinnon
Good day everyone In my battles to centralize my PF and other logs with a secure means I have decided to dump syslog because well, it couldn't handle the data loads without dropping data and I can't be loosing logs. I also don't want to install 3rd party software on my systems where possible as

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Marc L'Heureux
I don't know if pf can do this, but I've seen ISPs throttle connections the longer they're open. This allows legitimate traffic like HTTP to get their small webpage, but larger downloads (such as P2P, but also large HTTP downloads) take exponentially longer. This can still be circumvented by

Re: Cards/chips supporting hostap mode

2005-10-11 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:16:40AM -0700, Steve B wrote: I'm trying to find what wireless PCI cards or chipsets support hostap mode. The Prism 2/2.5/3 is referenced everywhere. Is that that the only one or do any of the others such as Atheros support hostap mode? ral(4) and ural(4) should

Re: Cards/chips supporting hostap mode

2005-10-11 Thread Fridtjof Busse
* Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm trying to find what wireless PCI cards or chipsets support hostap mode. The Prism 2/2.5/3 is referenced everywhere. Is that that the only one or do any of the others such as Atheros support hostap mode? I'm using a ral-based card (Sitecom) running without any

Installing gnucash docs ./configure error

2005-10-11 Thread Roger Neth Jr
Hello List, I have been trying to install gnucash docs with ./configure and the error is checking for dbopen... yes checking for db_185.h... no checking for db1/db.h... no checking for db4/bd_185.h... no configure: error: Berkeley db library required for GnuCash I perform a find and shows

Re: Cards/chips supporting hostap mode

2005-10-11 Thread Steve B
Thanks everyone!

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread ed
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:55:30 +1000 Rod.. Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RAID 1 (or any RAID really) is NOT a backup. It is a high availability system. High availability does NOT mean never unavailable. Hello again Rod, I've been looking at ways to make a redundant and load balanced SAN.

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread Spruell, Darren-Perot
From: ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been looking at ways to make a redundant and load balanced SAN. As you put it, it's not high reliability, once you get a problem with RAID, or the box that it's attached to, you can consider the data 'unknown'. The best solution that I have seen

Re: Installing gnucash docs ./configure error

2005-10-11 Thread Han Boetes
Roger Neth Jr wrote: Hello List, I have been trying to install gnucash docs with gnucash is in packages and the docs are included. # Han

I' searching job as OpenBSD admin

2005-10-11 Thread smonek
Hello I,m searching job as OpenBSD ( or other BSD systems / and also as Linux/Windows admin, it helpdesk ) I have 4 years - experience Location Edinburgh my english is not good but i'm still learning Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] my website www.techexpo.aplus.pl

Re: Installing gnucash docs ./configure error

2005-10-11 Thread Roger Neth Jr
Hello and thank you for the replies. I am running 3.7-stable and patches. I used pkg_add to install gnucash 1.8.11 from the 3.7/i386 (which I'm running on). When I access help it gives me Not Found; The specified URL could not be loaded. /usr/local/bin ./gnucash on term gives me this when I open

using mount -f with softdep to alleviate long fscks

2005-10-11 Thread Joe Advisor
Hello, I have my filesystems mounted softdep... /dev/wd0a / ffs rw,softdep 1 1 /dev/wd0f /home ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd0e /tmp ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid 1 2 /dev/wd0d /usr ffs rw,softdep,nodev 1 2 /dev/wd0g /var ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid 1 2 ... and I've read that if you use

Re: Audio play too fast on AC97 onboard

2005-10-11 Thread Marcin Wilk
Thank You all for help! I have made /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf file put there: srate=48000 framedrop=1 fs=1 af-adv=force=1 vf=pp=lb For all other software i have put in the /etc/esd.conf file: auto_spawn=1 spawn_options=-r 48000 -nobeeps -as 2 spawm_wait_ms=100 i will ocnfigure all other

PHP + SSH2

2005-10-11 Thread Vitor Acioli
Hi all, Good Afternoon, I am with some problems when trying to compile libssh2 in OpenBSD 3.7, Somebody already qualified PHP + LIBSSH2 in the OpenBSD and could give an aid to me? it follows below the errros! Error: # make all install gcc -o channel.o channel.c -c -g -O2 -I/usr/include

Re: httpd.conf, allow from lu can't get it to work

2005-10-11 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hi, sorry to repost this one. (obsd 3.8 with httpd 1.3.29) I still can't get it to work and was not able to find any related info in the faq or in the httpd manual, so I give it a second and last try on the list. I'm trying to use an allow from lu directive, only .lu domains should have access

Fw:FDDI-Ethernet Conversion

2005-10-11 Thread leth
- Forwarded by Tru H Le/GD_AAAV/GDAS on 10/11/2005 16:39 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/11/2005 16:34 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Message rejected Your message to misc@openbsd.org was rejected because it was not explicitly addressed to the misc mailing list. If you intended to send

Re: RAID for dummies

2005-10-11 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:07:49PM +0100, ed wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:55:30 +1000 Rod.. Whitworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RAID 1 (or any RAID really) is NOT a backup. It is a high availability system. High availability does NOT mean never unavailable. Hello again Rod, I've

Remote server hanging on boot please read

2005-10-11 Thread Gary Clemans-Gibbon
This is the day I've been dreading for just under two years of trouble free service. My colocated server which is a 4 hour drive away has broken. It is hanging on the white-on-blue boot message at Kernelized Raidframe activated and will proceed no further. According to the on site tech there

Re : Re: httpd.conf, allow from lu can't get it to work

2005-10-11 Thread Didier Wiroth
Hi, Thanks a lot for answering. My actual host is consistent: ~ # host 158.64.125.153 153.125.64.158.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer ppp-125-153.adsl.restena.lu. ~ # host ppp-125-153.adsl.restena.lu ppp-125-153.adsl.restena.lu has address 158.64.125.153 While connecting to the www server I used

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Michael Shalayeff
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Andrew Atrens: [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Okay, I've upgraded to a kernel with tag=OPENBSD_3_7 which looks to be the -stable or 'patch' tag, and while the situation has improved, performance is still off by a

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Andrew Atrens
Michael Shalayeff wrote: Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Andrew Atrens: [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Okay, I've upgraded to a kernel with tag=OPENBSD_3_7 which looks to be the -stable or 'patch' tag, and while the situation has improved,

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Jeff Ross
I've got a USB external drive that is virtually unusable because it is so slow. mount dev/sd0a on / type ffs (local) /dev/sd0p on /backup type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, softdep) /dev/sd0o on /destdir type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, softdep) /dev/sd0d on /home type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid,

Re: Little log advice needed

2005-10-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
--On 11 October 2005 11:31 -0400, James Mackinnon wrote: I created a file that has the following info and made it executable to root and the wheel group and no access to everyone. This file sits in /usr/local/bin with the name logkick # !/bin/sh # this file is used to roll over the PFLog file

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Nick Holland
David Elze wrote: Hi, I'm trying to block p2p traffic via pf on OpenBSD 3.x. Unfortunately, all new p2p-clients are able to use dynamic ports or even (ab-)use http-ports etc. so blocking well known p2p-ports is not enough. yep. Apart from blocking ports I just see two possibilities: -

Anyone tried this hardware raid solution?

2005-10-11 Thread Jean-Daniel Beaubien
Hi everyone, I am wondering if anyone tried this (http://www.allmediait.com/html/araid.html) hardware raid solution. It seems to only support PATA. Anyways I was just wondering if anyone had any experiences with this box. Anyone ever compared it to an Accusys 7500? On a side note,

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:24:01 -0400, Nick Holland wrote: David Elze wrote: Hi, I'm trying to block p2p traffic via pf on OpenBSD 3.x. Unfortunately, all new p2p-clients are able to use dynamic ports or even (ab-)use http-ports etc. so blocking well known p2p-ports is not enough. yep.

Re: Anyone tried this hardware raid solution?

2005-10-11 Thread Richard P. Koett
Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: Hi everyone, I am wondering if anyone tried this (http://www.allmediait.com/html/araid.html) hardware raid solution. It seems to only support PATA. Anyways I was just wondering if anyone had any experiences with this box. Anyone ever compared it to an

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Peter Hessler
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:27:27 -0600 (MDT) Jeff Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I've got a USB external drive that is virtually unusable because it : is so slow. : [snip] : (write a file to the usb drive) : : time sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/usb_drive/test_file count=100 : : 100+0 records

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Andrew Atrens
I don't see the 'EHCI' controller in there anywhere. :( UHCI == usb1.1 EHCI == usb2.0 Top speed for usb1.1 is roughly 1MB/s. Your getting that. :| Two possibilities - your mobo doesn't do usb2.0 - or the ehci device probe isn't grokking your hardware. Andrew. Jeff Ross wrote: I've got a USB

Re: Blocking p2p via pf

2005-10-11 Thread Spruell, Darren-Perot
From: Nick Holland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Theoretically, this is a weak solution. However, PRACTICALLY speaking, it's simple and very effective. Other than blocked services opening up alternative entry points, I've not actually seen anyone bypass this system in real life (for example,

Re: Motherboard Recommendation

2005-10-11 Thread J Moore
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:09:41PM +0100, the unit calling itself Simon Morgan wrote: Hi, I'm interested in building a machine for use as an OpenBSD workstation and would appreciate any recommendations on AMD64 motherboards that are well supported. I assume there are people on this list

Re: Anyone tried this hardware raid solution?

2005-10-11 Thread J Moore
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:24:11PM -0400, the unit calling itself Jean-Daniel Beaubien wrote: Hi everyone, I am wondering if anyone tried this (http://www.allmediait.com/html/araid.html) hardware raid solution. It seems to only support PATA. Anyways I was just wondering if anyone had

Re: using mount -f with softdep to alleviate long fscks

2005-10-11 Thread Ted Unangst
On 10/11/05, Joe Advisor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... and I've read that if you use softdep, fsck is only necessary to recover lost disk space ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109668072628188w=2 ... but when I pull out the fsck (basically commented out lines 87 to 119 in

Re: very, very slow usb data transfer speed on 3.7

2005-10-11 Thread Andreas Bihlmaier
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ (17:39) -- # dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null bs=819200 count=20 20+0 records in 20+0 records out 16384000 bytes transferred in 0.711 secs (23012820 bytes/sec) recall the old speed with apm0: - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ (17:13) -- # dd if=/dev/wd0c of=/dev/null