Craig Skinner wrote:
Darren Spruell wrote:
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
use when connecting using tip(1) from the first to a console on the
second?
[snip]
Then, on either box, I
On 9/19/07, Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did anyone notice that this thread was accidentally brought back
from almost a year ago?
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
A lot of people has praised the current OpenBSD installer.
I too. I think it is at the right level and does the right
things,
Hello,
I am wondering what software could I use besides pf to forwarding
traffic coming in on my server on a specific port to another ip on my
lan?
Basically I'm using an openbsd as my router and I want to forward
public traffic coming in on a certain port to a computer behind it in
my lan. What
On 19/09/2007, Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same time as
I was wondering this also. I am really looking forward to the release
to replace GNU CVS.
I think ( I might be wrong ), the code is there in current, but not
linked
Jake Conk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am wondering what software could I use besides pf to forwarding
traffic coming in on my server on a specific port to another ip on my
lan?
PF is in the base system and pretty easy to configure for setups like
the one you describe -
Basically I'm using
Hi list!
We are working on SMP adaption of the programming language Erlang.
It is an emulated language with light weight threads. The threads
are run on a set of schelulers. These schedulers run in separate
Posix threads.
On Linux we see that using as many schedulers (Posix threads)
as there are
Tony Abernethy wrote:
Dunno about anyone else, but that seems like some kind of poetic justice.
Preserving the pseudo-integrity of garbage seems like it should be very low
on the list of priorities.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but I do think that persuading the
mailing list server
Ok. I get this error:
Checksum mismatch for distribution file. Please investigate.
Where should I be looking?
The full message:
cpan install Bundle::CPAN
CPAN: Storable loaded ok
Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:36:49 GMT
CPAN:
I am getting this message from Charlie Root over and over:
Checking mailbox ownership.
user clock mailbox is drwx--, group users
Does it mean I should change the mailbox flags or group? If yes, what are
the correct values then?
CL
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
I am getting this message from Charlie Root over and over:
Checking mailbox ownership.
user clock mailbox is drwx--, group users
Does it mean I should change the mailbox flags or group? If yes, what are
the correct values then?
Needs to be owned by the system user,
Le 20 sept. 07 ` 07:10, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor a icrit :
On 9/19/07, Adrian Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Who here knows about OpenCVS?
2. How is it used?
3. When will it be released? Will it be released at the same
time as
4.2?
Regards,
A.
1. OpenCVS is developed by
Hello Everybody,
While trying to build xenocara's most recent sources:
=== proto/bigreqsproto
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
cleandir
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f Makefile.bsd-wrapper
depend
no dependencies here yet
cd
Lots of new changes coming to Digg! We're excited to introduce you
to the new Digg Profiles. With over fifty new features, we've
completely revamped our profiles from the ground up - making it easy
for you to share your favorite Digg stories with friends. If you'd
like to see them in action, visit
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello Everybody,
While trying to build xenocara's most recent sources:
=== proto/bigreqsproto
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f
Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f
Makefile.bsd-wrapper depend
no dependencies
* Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello Everybody,
While trying to build xenocara's most recent sources:
=== proto/bigreqsproto
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f
Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hello Everybody,
While trying to build xenocara's most recent sources:
=== proto/bigreqsproto
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto exec make -f
Makefile.bsd-wrapper cleandir
cd /usr/xenocara/proto/bigreqsproto
On 9/19/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Security is one of the concerns Leopard will solve.
**BLAM**
Security is never, ever a completely solved problem. Your world just
isn' that simple. Do NOT pass GO.
I sincerely hope never to hear
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:28:48 -0700
Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are resources a-plenty; anyone who finds it confusing is either
trying to install without having read docs, or is not familiar with
computers in the first place (and thus needs to read the docs.)
Computer users
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:08:55AM +1000, The One wrote:
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my opinion, Apple performs 100% in the software field, and 90% in
the hardware field, which is due to, as I explained in my previous
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:28:48 -0700
Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Computer users need to get smarter, instead of technology getting
dumber for them.
I could not disagree more with this statement.
Will
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just learned that the disk in the X40 is kind of special. It is a 1.8
hard disk that does NOT use the ZIF connector (these are somewhat common)
but the same 44pin connector 2.5 disks use. 1.8 disks with that
connector have only ever been made by
On 9/20/07, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't bother following up, I won't be listening. Or maybe I will, and
I might even venture out from under my rock again before 4.4 ships.
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my
On 9/20/07, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/19/07, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Security is one of the concerns Leopard will solve.
**BLAM**
Security is never, ever a completely solved problem. Your world just
isn' that
Sorry but I am just disagreed with Theo saying that OS X is buggy and insecure.
On 9/21/07, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:08:55AM +1000, The One wrote:
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion,
In my opinion, you're simply a source of off-topic noise for this
mailing list. There has to be dozens of mailing lists, web forums and
the like where your fruit worship is welcome. Please go there.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:00:11AM +1000, The One wrote:
Sorry but I am just disagreed with Theo saying that OS X is buggy and
insecure.
Whatever. BORED already.
Go troll elsewhere.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Weisgerber)
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:57 am
Subject: Re: help needed with laptop hdd
To: misc@openbsd.org
Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just learned that the disk in the X40 is kind of special. It is
a
Hi All,
I'm using a Soekris box with OpenBSD 4.0 (sorry *g*) on my home soekris box.
Actual setup is one interface with a cable modem connected for internet use.
The cable modem provider talks dhcp, so no pppoe magic involved.
Now I do have an old second DSL provider lying around, which I
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 at 20:41 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Lets take a typical family setup. Mom is the SA who knows the root
password. Dad can be operator and do stuff with sudo. However, the
kids may just want to listen to CDs, watch DVDs, access their homework
on a USB stick, rip a
Marian Hettwer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm using a Soekris box with OpenBSD 4.0 (sorry *g*) on my home soekris box.
Actual setup is one interface with a cable modem connected for internet use.
The cable modem provider talks dhcp, so no pppoe magic involved.
Now I do have an old second DSL provider
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my opinion, Apple performs 100% in the software field, and 90% in
the hardware field, which is due to, as I explained in my previous
messages, depending off
[IMAGE]Having trouble reading this email? See it in your browser
ArabianBusiness.com Daily News Alert
GHMK ]m Gacf^Z:
GaCMO ,20 SHJcHQ 2007
[IMAGE]
GaCNHGQ GaQFmSmI
dGSOG_ fHfQUI OHm JZadGd GJ]G^G cTJQ_G HTCd Jca_
got a ural a supposedly supported usb wifi adapter, BUFFALO
WLI-U2-KG54-AI, and it's showing up as a detachable cd drive on a
4.1-release machine:
umass0 at uhub3 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0
umass0: BUFFALO WLI-U2-KG54-AI, rev 2.00/1.15, addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus0 at
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:01:52PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
| got a ural a supposedly supported usb wifi adapter, BUFFALO
| WLI-U2-KG54-AI, and it's showing up as a detachable cd drive on a
| 4.1-release machine:
|
| umass0 at uhub3 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0
| umass0: BUFFALO
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
got a ural a supposedly supported usb wifi adapter, BUFFALO
WLI-U2-KG54-AI, and it's showing up as a detachable cd drive on a
4.1-release machine:
umass0 at uhub3 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0
umass0: BUFFALO WLI-U2-KG54-AI, rev 2.00/1.15, addr 2
umass0: using SCSI
On 9/20/07, Gregory Edigarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you kidding?
No he wasn't. Did you read /usr/src/xenocara/README? There's a whole
paragraph discussing your case:
more +134 /usr/src/xenocara/README.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd be unhappy with the write cycle longevity of a flash drive for
regular use anyway.
I'm not going to take your word for it.
Speaking of flash drives, I recently realized again that the OpenBSD
CVS repository isn't all that big by todays standards: about 4 GB,
On Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 19:02:23 +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I need to look at the options for fitting a compact flash as an ATA
drive into a normal PC.
There are lot's of adapters. Some examples can be found here:
http://www.pcengines.ch/cflash.htm
Maurice
On 2007/09/20 10:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd be unhappy with the write cycle longevity of a flash drive for
regular use anyway.
This depends very much on what your regular use is. They're a lot
tougher than common knowledge would have you believe.
- Original Message -
From: Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:29 pm
Subject: Re: help needed with laptop hdd
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
On 2007/09/20 10:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd be unhappy with the write cycle longevity of
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:20:49 +0200
Maurice Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 19:02:23 +, Christian
Weisgerber wrote:
I need to look at the options for fitting a compact flash as an ATA
drive into a normal PC.
There are lot's of adapters. Some examples
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:43:29PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
However, the old DSL provider tries to get on my ass, and I figured,
okay boys, if you don't let me outta this contract, I'll use your
uplink to the max 24/7 (while true; do wget -O /dev/null
http://something.iso; done).
If you
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:13:48AM -0400, stuart van Zee wrote:
There is no such thing as Solving Security. It does not exist.
It could only exist in a perfect world and as you know, or at least
should know, this is NOT a perfect world.
I have one absolutely secure computer. Actually I
According to:
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
W^X will not work on Intel's 64 bit chips. I for one chose to go with i386 on
my Core 2 because of this fact alone.
Then I saw this:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20041011182310.html
and scores of other pages that refer to the XD bit.
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
W^X will not work on Intel's 64 bit chips. I for one chose to go with i386 on
my Core 2 because of this fact alone.
Intel produces 2 families of 64-bit processors; the EM64T and an AMD64
On 09/19/07 13:07, Die Gestalt wrote:
On 9/19/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think in German, it's call Chaise or something very close to that I
believe, but I am absolutely sure the spelling is not good.
..
ScheiC e? Merde?
Using non-ASCII characters in e-mail is also:
On 9/20/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to:
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
W^X will not work on Intel's 64 bit chips. I for one chose to go with i386
on my Core 2 because of this fact alone.
the early chips
I am not so sure of that.If you go here:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx and then select Core 2 Duo or
some such... then filter by Execute Disable Bit under supported features...
you will see a bunch of Core 2s.
The Core 2 is ia32e. It is not EM64T. According to some sites... if
having a nightmare getting two openbsd (one 3.8, one 4.0) boxes to
setup a tunnel. finally got the phase 1 negotiation going (or so i
believe from reviewing the logs) but it appears that the phase two
starts and is just abandoned.
my best guess is that the default definitions for
On 9/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not so sure of that.If you go here:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/Default.aspx and then select Core 2 Duo or
some such... then filter by Execute Disable Bit under supported features...
you will see a bunch of Core 2s.
The Core
Well I'll be durned.. apparently ia32e is EM64T(Intel's marketing name for it).
I was thinking it was the itanium arch which is actually ia64. But either
way... EM64T is supposed to run on AMD64... the only question is will OpenBSD
respond accordingly when NXE is present during dmesg. And if
n0g0013 wrote:
having a nightmare getting two openbsd (one 3.8, one 4.0) boxes to
setup a tunnel. finally got the phase 1 negotiation going (or so i
believe from reviewing the logs) but it appears that the phase two
starts and is just abandoned.
This may not be the best advise, but there have
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:26:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd be unhappy with the write cycle longevity of a flash drive for
regular use anyway. Flash and super dense mag drives seem fine for use
if write/erase only happens occasionally (i.e. embedded/mp3 etc...)
The next step:
The next
- Original Message -
From: RW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: help needed with laptop hdd
To: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:26:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd be unhappy with the write cycle longevity of a
On 9/20/07, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there anybody successfully using skype on OpenBSD 4.1 using Linux
emulation?
If so which RPM are you using?
O.K with the help of Martynas Venckus I got Skype running on 4.1
had to copy
libasound.so.2 = /usr/lib/libasound.so.2
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:25:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess they are great and I'm an idiot, nuff said...
No. I don't think so.
There are lots of things (in techy stuff particularly) that are true at
some point.
Later on that thing becomes no longer true but the meme hangs around
and
Hello there.
We have a bunch of obsd firewalls, 8 at the moment, all working nice and
so forth. But we
need to add about another 4 in there for new connections and networks,
which means more
machines to find room for.
So basically I have been asked to investigate running all these
firewalls
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Josh wrote:
Hello there.
We have a bunch of obsd firewalls, 8 at the moment, all working
nice and so forth. But we
need to add about another 4 in there for new connections and
networks, which means more
machines to find room for.
So basically I have been
Josh wrote:
Hello there.
We have a bunch of obsd firewalls, 8 at the moment, all working nice and
so forth. But we
need to add about another 4 in there for new connections and networks,
which means more
machines to find room for.
So basically I have been asked to investigate running
On 9/20/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Josh wrote:
Can someone please inform me if this is a really bad idea or not,
ideally with some nice reasoning?
What type of throughput is required between each segment? If you've
been around here much, you've
On 9/19/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/09/19 14:48, Tomas wrote:
Watching the thread about startup script I thought of a question about
shutdown script. Is it necessary to shutdown certain services when machine
goes down? Like for example mysql, dovecot, clamav,
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:53 PM, bofh wrote:
On 9/20/07, Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 20, 2007, at 9:09 PM, Josh wrote:
Can someone please inform me if this is a really bad idea or not,
ideally with some nice reasoning?
What type of throughput is required between each segment?
Yes the PF setup appears to be very easy to setup and I've tried doing
it but I can't get it working like the OpenBSD website describes which
is why I'm looking for another solution...
I added this rdr rule to my pf.conf:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port ftp - 192.168.10.9 port ftp
On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:17 PM, Jake Conk wrote:
Yes the PF setup appears to be very easy to setup and I've tried doing
it but I can't get it working like the OpenBSD website describes which
is why I'm looking for another solution...
I added this rdr rule to my pf.conf:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp
On 9/21/07, stuart van Zee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone can solve security, whether it is with Leopard or in the
future, Apple definitely can.
In my opinion, Apple performs 100% in the software field, and 90% in
the hardware field, which is due
On 9/20/07, The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but I am just disagreed with Theo saying that OS X is buggy and
insecure.
Who gives a shit? This tread is more then FIVE months old and didnt
even belong here in the first place. Just stop.
---
Lars Hansson
Many people are in agreement over this.
Is it possible for someone in charge of the list to either ban or somehow stop
The One [EMAIL PROTECTED] from continuing this particular thread/subject?
Thank you!
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:36:34AM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
On 9/20/07, The One [EMAIL
Lemme give you a big whack with the old cluestick guys..
Trolls only work if you *respond*.
If you don't feed it. it goes away.
Please just stop feeding the trolls.
68 matches
Mail list logo
