gt; wrote:
Hi, I'm Jesse at Cypress Technology Inc. We at Cypress sell HP
hardware.
Below are some links to HP PA-RISC and IA64 boxes that support the
Linux
Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD, OpenBSD Linux and HP-UX Unix platforms. If
you
are in need of systems, feel free to email back
Oct 2022 at 13:16, Jesse Dougherty wrote:
> Hi, I'm Jesse at Cypress Technology Inc. We at Cypress sell HP hardware.
> Below are some links to HP PA-RISC and IA64 boxes that support the Linux
> Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD, OpenBSD Linux and HP-UX Unix platforms. If you
> are in need of system
Hi, I'm Jesse at Cypress Technology Inc. We at Cypress sell HP hardware.
Below are some links to HP PA-RISC and IA64 boxes that support the Linux
Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD, OpenBSD Linux and HP-UX Unix platforms. If you
are in need of systems, feel free to email back with any question or
requests
hmm, on Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Toni Mueller said that
Although JCR calls it FUD, my personal opinion is that HP-UX is quite
dead, with today's commercial Unices being AIX or Solaris. The latter
imho has the best prospects of surviving, now that IBM is also shipping
it.
it's
On 8/31/07, frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, on Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Toni Mueller said that
Although JCR calls it FUD, my personal opinion is that HP-UX is quite
dead, with today's commercial Unices being AIX or Solaris. The latter
imho has the best prospects
* Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-29 23:48]:
On 8/29/07, Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial,
snip
In general the only truly fair test data you'll find is in the various
presentations made by Theo and other developers over the years which
compares OpenBSD to itself, with and without specific security features
enabled. It can give you a rough idea of the performance cost of the
various
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if the LDAP system is to handle network-wide logins...
2007/8/29, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if
Gerardo Santana Gsmez Garrido wrote:
2007/8/29, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:45:01PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if the LDAP system is to handle network-wide logins...
This doesn't stop you
On 8/29/07, Jussi Peltola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:17:11PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if the LDAP system is
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
We run an OpenLDAP installation on OpenBSD that is fully synchronized
on two servers (one master, one slave) for the public schools here.
~15'000 accounts and all important systems (email, fileserver, even
the ~80 firewalls, login, etc.) pull their data from it.
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be
cheaper, faster to setup, and easier to maintain (because
of your experience with Open.) Both OpenBSD and HP-UX can
do LDAP, yes, but it's yourself that makes
and decided to use other
OSes instead.
How was your adventure?? Can you be more specific?? I know the cost
part...obviously it is more cheaper run OpenBSD that HP-UX. But i need
more...something really heavy like I tried to install an OpenLDAP with
HP-UX and the system load with 2000 users
Joachim Schipper wrote:
P.S. One more issue: you *do* realize that getting OpenBSD to
authenticate against LDAP is not entirely trivial, right? This might be
a serious problem if the LDAP system is to handle network-wide logins...
OpenBSD can not authenticat against an LDAP server. Well,
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's yourself that makes the difference
here.
Oh, and you have much more
say nothing about HP-UX, but OpenBSD surely is a stable foundation
for an OpenLDAP server.
- Marc Balmer, micro systems
Thanks in advance,
alvaro
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper,
faster to setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience
with Open.) Both OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's
yourself that makes the difference
you be more specific?? I know the cost
part...obviously it is more cheaper run OpenBSD that HP-UX. But i need
more...something really heavy like I tried to install an OpenLDAP with
HP-UX and the system load with 2000 users rise to the sky...but the same
number of users with OpenBSD had
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper,
faster to setup, and easier to maintain (because of your
experience with Open.) Both OpenBSD and HP-UX can do
about the advantages of OpenBSD over HP-UX. But...i have
hope yet...he does not close the door to the OpenBSD possibility. He
wants probes...only i need to find a heavy argument. For example...the
developers that port OpenBSD to HPPA and HP300 platformsmaybe they
have benchmarks between
think, the main point for my boss and his not
understanding about the advantages of OpenBSD over HP-UX. But...i
have hope yet...he does not close the door to the OpenBSD
possibility. He wants probes...only i need to find a heavy argument.
For example...the developers that port OpenBSD to HPPA
On 8/27/07, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's
information about the HP-UX skills doing this role. The price for
the solution (HP-UX or OpenBSD) does not matter this time, so the
argument OpenBSD is OpenSource and the other is a propietary Unix $$
is not an acceptable argument.
Anyone have experience with this two OS?? Is there any heavy
this two OS and there is a
poor information about the HP-UX skills doing this role. The price for
the solution (HP-UX or OpenBSD) does not matter this time, so the
argument OpenBSD is OpenSource and the other is a propietary Unix $$
is not an acceptable argument.
Anyone have experience
doesn't show a
truly comparative between this two OS and there is a poor information
*snip*
Just tell him that OpenBSD in the stead of HP-UX will be cheaper, faster to
setup, and easier to maintain (because of your experience with Open.) Both
OpenBSD and HP-UX can do LDAP, yes, but it's yourself
a truly comparative between this two OS and there
is a poor information about the HP-UX skills doing this role. The
price for the solution (HP-UX or OpenBSD) does not matter this
time, so the argument OpenBSD is OpenSource and the other is a
propietary Unix $$ is not an acceptable argument
doesn't show a truly comparative between this two OS and there is a
poor information about the HP-UX skills doing this role. The price for
the solution (HP-UX or OpenBSD) does not matter this time, so the
argument OpenBSD is OpenSource and the other is a propietary Unix $$
is not an acceptable
this two OS and there is a
poor information about the HP-UX skills doing this role. The price
for the solution (HP-UX or OpenBSD) does not matter this time, so
the argument OpenBSD is OpenSource and the other is a propietary Unix
$$ is not an acceptable argument.
Anyone have experience
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
tried to take a bit of a side adventure and get HP-UX going on a
PA-RISC machine and it's no walk in the park. for cost, support,
compatibility and simplicity reasons i've abandoned the project and
decided to use other OSes instead.
31 matches
Mail list logo
