On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:35:06AM +0100, Frank Albrecht wrote:
Do you still record with the BT878 card ?
Yes, from the DVD-T Box via fbas(composite). This Signal contains
already Blocks due to the mpeg-bitrate.
Do you mean that the signal from the DVD-T box that is being recorded
already
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Dik Takken wrote:
What I see when running 'top' is that the user CPU usage is about 90% and
system usage 10%. This happens when I capture at 640x480 or higher
resolution. I only get 100% perfect captures at 512x384 and below.
Hmmm, that is puzzling - I thought
Hi,
sorry for my bad english.
I have used a BT878 card for capturing from TV and VHS via
composite with a Linux(now 9.0) and mjpegtools 1.6.2-0.
Now, we have DVB-T and i would like to keep this setup for
some time, it works fine.
Since with DVB-T there are still blocking artifacts, i would ask
Am Dienstag 14 Dezember 2004 18.33 schrieb Steven M. Schultz:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Michael Hanke wrote:
I tried to build the mjpegtools from CVS. Unfortunately, I could not run
autogen.sh successfully. The most important error:
HAVE_PNG not defined in AM_CONDITIONAL
That
Hallo
You are not subscribed to the list, so your mail was held. Subscribe to
the mjpeg-users list before posting again, else your mail will be held
again, add wait till one mailinglistadmin approves your mail.
I have used a BT878 card for capturing from TV and VHS via
composite with a
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
Keep in mind as well that for MJPEG, if you crank the quality of the
recording up quite high, you'll also need a speedy hard drive to...
Yep - and I think that (more than the speed of the cpu) is what
is causing problems for Dik.
What I see
Dik,
Sorry, I made a mistake in the first example (untested code, you
know). I tested this one, it works:
#!/bin/python
import mpeg,sys
in_filenames=sys.argv[1:-1]
out_filename=sys.argv[-1]
in_mpegs=map(mpeg.MpegFile,in_filenames)
reduce(lambda a,b: a+b, in_mpegs).to_file(out_filename)
On
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:34:43AM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Richard Ellis wrote:
might also consider one of the hardware mpeg2 compression boards
instead of a MJPEG/DV solution. I can attest that the Hauppage WinTV
PVR250 card's will generate a simply
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 21:35:19 +0100 (CET), Dik Takken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think that, since 12GB/hr is not exceptionally large, DV is still
a bit of a space/quality compromise compared to MJPEG. This video format
is not designed with video editing in mind, rather storage. MJPEG on
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Ray Cole wrote:
Glad to see someone else has the same type of problems :-) I'm using
automake 1.8.5 and autoconf 2.59. I get a ton of AM_CONDITIONAL errors.
Are you sure that automake is completely installed and that you
have all of the -devel
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Dik Takken wrote:
Since my computer (Athlon 1400) is too slow to capture high quality, full
res MJPEG video, I consider buying a hardware MJPEG capture card. There
Hmmm, I didn't think cpu speed mattered all that much for 'capture'
purposes but rather
On Monday 13 December 2004 22:32, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Dik Takken wrote:
What I see when running 'top' is that the user CPU usage is about 90% and
system usage 10%. This happens when I capture at 640x480 or higher
resolution. I only get 100% perfect captures at
Glad to see someone else has the same type of problems :-) I'm using automake
1.8.5 and autoconf 2.59. I get a ton of AM_CONDITIONAL errors. I'd love to
try out some of the changes that have happened over the past year but can't
(sniff).
processing .
Running libtoolize...
You should add the
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:35:06AM +0100, Frank Albrecht wrote:
Do you still record with the BT878 card ?
Yes, from the DVD-T Box via fbas(composite). This Signal contains
already Blocks due to the mpeg-bitrate.
Do you mean that the signal from the DVD-T box that is being recorded
already
if 320x480 frame then size_per_hour = 20.0 GB/hr * quality_factor/100
if 640x480 frame then size_per_hour = 40.0 GB/hr * quality_factor/100
DV is a flat ~12GB/hr. Now some have mentioned that as a shortcoming
(you don't get to select the quality) - but it's a feature to me.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 09:54:38AM -0800, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
I do not know if the PVR-250 (or 350) can be used as a general
purpose capture/encoding device (if a VHS deck can be attached) or
if it's limited to signals received via the TV tuner section of the
card.
The PVR-250 has 3
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Martin Samuelsson wrote:
Hmmm, that is puzzling - I thought the card was supposed to be
doing the jpeg compression, almost sounds like some of that is
being done in the host.
Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but... You seem to assume that Dik has
a
I got past the autogen.sh stuff. Now I'm getting a plain ol' compiler error:
mpeg2encoptions.cc: In member function `int
MPEG2EncOptions::InferStreamDataParams(const MPEG2EncInVidParams)':
mpeg2encoptions.cc:149: error: `mpeg_valid_framerate_code' undeclared (first
use this function)
Well, I think I was in the wrong branch. I now re-fetched the code without
specifying a branch. It looks like more modern stuff. Anyway, when I try to
run autogen.sh with it I get:
configure.ac:107: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DEFINE
If this token and others are legitimate,
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 12:15:22AM +0100, Dik Takken wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Richard Ellis wrote:
I want to edit the video after capture, so an MPEG2 capture card
is not an option. The image quality is too low.
Editing is indeed an option: LVE (http://lvempeg.sourceforge.net/).
Maybe someone else will have some suggestions other than install a newer
system ;)
Not me. It is eventually quicker and better to move to a recent distribution.
Just done it for exactly the same reasons Just upgrade, intalls are easy
enough (mind initio and SCSI and MDK 10.0 though.
May be
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 03:41:49PM +0100, Frank Albrecht wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:35:06AM +0100, Frank Albrecht wrote:
Yes, from the DVD-T Box via fbas(composite). This Signal
contains already Blocks due to the mpeg-bitrate.
Do you mean that the signal from the DVD-T box that
22 matches
Mail list logo
