Ken Williams wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan McCormick) wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I was just trying to hack a script into showing its HTML output to a
> >browser by setting the content type to 'text/plain', but it looks like
> >Apache::SSI, which I'm using, always sets the content type to
> >'text/h
So, I was having a hell of a time to get DBlib to work in a module. The
code worked fine as a script, but the database handle was not created
properly when with a module. As I prepared for Harikari, I looked at the
loggs and php glared back at me.
My compile was:
Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) mod_perl/1
Has anyone had this problem? When I make test on mod_perl 1.22, the
program launches the test httpd, but waits for the server to warm up, keeps
waiting and finally gives up.
It turns out a test httpd was launched and on the desired port, so it would
seem the daemon is finding the test httpd.c
Hi,
I just spent about an hour trying out all kinds of web hosting
comparision sites, with no luck. I recall that being asked before,
but deja.com couldn't find anything on the news either, so I hope
you don't mind asking it once again:
does anyknow know to suggest a web hosting service, that su
Hi,
I'm using apache_1.3.12 / mod_perl-1.22 , on Suse 6.1 .
when I try to install modperl, when perl Makefile.PL, I get the result before.
After that, I can't make && make test && make install :
make test crashes at listening to the port 8529.
I think I did everything recommended in mod_perl g
The binaries on both boxes are the same. They get rdist'd out from one
machine every night.
I'm going to rebuild the latest versions of everything on the 2.7 machine
tomorrow and see if that makes a difference.
At 10:57 PM 4/13/00 -0400, Mark Imbriaco wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Jason Bodnar w
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Jason Bodnar wrote:
> Hmmm ... maybe it's a problem with Solaris 5.7?
Can you try the binaries from the 2.6 box on the 2.7 box to see if that
works? That would at least kind of indicate whether it's an OS bug or a
configuration bug.
-Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan McCormick) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was just trying to hack a script into showing its HTML output to a
>browser by setting the content type to 'text/plain', but it looks like
>Apache::SSI, which I'm using, always sets the content type to
>'text/html' (line 23 Apache::SSI).
I'll rem
Hi,
I was just trying to hack a script into showing its HTML output to a
browser by setting the content type to 'text/plain', but it looks like
Apache::SSI, which I'm using, always sets the content type to
'text/html' (line 23 Apache::SSI).
I'm also using Apache::ASP, which apparently gets its
$
> > I've been getting frustrated by the mandatory warning created by 'use
> > constant' under mod_perl, caused by constant subroutines being redefined
> > when imported. In particular, with Archive::Zip this was adding hundreds
of
> > lines to my log every restart.
>
> what version of Perl are you
this copy-n-paste from ~/Mail/.sent-mail-dec-1999 might help:
---
a few things could shed some more light:
build a libperld.a and compile with PERL_DEBUG=1 (see SUPPORT doc)
and/or, in gdb:
(gdb) source mod_perl-1.21/.gdbinit
(gdb) curinfo
should tell you the line/filename of the offending Perl
> Two followup questions:
>
> 1) Would truss show this -- or is there a way to test this?
>
> 2) Would you expect the child to survive a kill -9 while hanging?
if the process is in a state where you can't kill -9 or attach with strace
or gdb, etc., i have no idea exactly what triggered that. a
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> > Doug, I guess this is something that should be addressed as a
> > Makefile.PL configuration parameter. I myself have encountered a few
> > problems with the User/Group values picked by the build process in a
> > complex NIS environment and have had
> Doug, I guess this is something that should be addressed as a
> Makefile.PL configuration parameter. I myself have encountered a few
> problems with the User/Group values picked by the build process in a
> complex NIS environment and have had to manually modify the httpd.conf
> used during the '
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Shevek wrote:
> I have a nasty feeling this might be the RULE_EXPAT thing, I didn't do a
> RULE_EXPAT=no when building Apache. Is there documentation describing the
> dirty details of the issue? Can anybody confirm?
well, are you using XML::Parser? if so, why not confirm yo
>
> #0 0xff1d7540 in Perl_sv_clear ()
>from
> /opt/gnu/depot/perl5.004_04/lib/sun4-solaris/5.00404/CORE/libperl.so
It crashs somewhere deep inside of Perl, so it's hard to say what's happeing
here.
I would first try to recompile all modules (maybe Perl itself also), to make
sure things fit
#0 0xff1d7540 in Perl_sv_clear ()
from /opt/gnu/depot/perl5.004_04/lib/sun4-solaris/5.00404/CORE/libperl.so
#1 0xff1d7880 in Perl_sv_free ()
from /opt/gnu/depot/perl5.004_04/lib/sun4-solaris/5.00404/CORE/libperl.so
#2 0xff1ea2a8 in Perl_free_tmps ()
from /opt/gnu/depot/perl5.004_04/lib
> If you tell me what to do I'll try to get a stack backtrace.
>
http://perl.apache.org/embperl/Faq.pod.1.html#make_test_fails_with_a_SIG
_
Gerald
At 10:21 PM 4/12/00 -0400, Mike Lambert wrote:
>This is my first post on the list, hopefully it's helpful. ;)
>
>We've had great success with InfoBoard. We have four mod_perl accounts set
>up with them, and we are currently moving to a colocated server that they
>are hosting for us. They have good
On 13-Apr-2000 Mark Ng wrote:
> can you tell me the following about your 2 systems (the one that works and
> the new
> one), I have the same problem.
>
> I need to know:
> Versions of: Perl
Both are 5.004_04
> apache
Both are 1.3.9
> modperl
Both are 1.21
> embperl
Both are 1.2.1
> OS (E
On 13-Apr-2000 Gerald Richter wrote:
>> Trying to use Apache::Session with Embperl 1.2.1, mod_perl 1.21,
>> Apache 1.3.9.
>> I've got this running on another machine just fine with the exact
>> same setup (I
>> think).
>>
>>
>> When I try access an Embperl page that uses %udat I get:
>>
>> [Thu Ap
Yep, when _not_ using root to do the make and make test. The make test
succeeded.
Thanks for the help.
At 10:59 PM 4/12/00 -0700, you wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Adam Joffe wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > trying to set up a new linux box. real vanilla using apaci, everything=1,
> > do_httpd=1, etc.
Yes, Crypt::SSLeay or Net::SSLeay will work nicely. You'll probably need
to install OpenSSL as I requirement. I'm pretty sure about this. I have
openSSL installed, so you probably need it. It's pretty easy to
compile/install.
I'm using Net::SSLeay to create a SSL connection to our real-time cre
for some reason, hopefully a simple and fixable one, I can connect to the
database from a script, but when I wrtie the same code into a mod, the
$dbh is not created. The code is straight forward and the handler is
part of a directive
SetHandler "perl-script"
PerlHandler isoft::twigauth
===
> Trying to use Apache::Session with Embperl 1.2.1, mod_perl 1.21,
> Apache 1.3.9.
> I've got this running on another machine just fine with the exact
> same setup (I
> think).
>
>
> When I try access an Embperl page that uses %udat I get:
>
> [Thu Apr 13 14:51:05 2000] [notice] Apache/1.3.9 (Unix
Trying to use Apache::Session with Embperl 1.2.1, mod_perl 1.21, Apache 1.3.9.
I've got this running on another machine just fine with the exact same setup (I
think).
I created a db called sessions with a table called sessions:
mysql> show fields from sessions;
+---+-+--+
Check an archive of the LWP mailing list, but I recall you need
Crypt::SSLeay
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to use lwp-request or HTTP::Request inside a Apache module to
access a secure (https) server? What else must you add on?
The normal call - lwp-request https://www.somewhere.com respondes with
'https not supported'
Is there any way around this?
TIA, Cliff
I have a nasty feeling this might be the RULE_EXPAT thing, I didn't do a
RULE_EXPAT=no when building Apache. Is there documentation describing the
dirty details of the issue? Can anybody confirm?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=0x410) at mutex.c:82
Global should be added to @INC, and its always worked
for me. Are you sure that your .htaccess is being used?
Set debugging to -2 and check out what the error_log
says for one request. If global is set, but @INC is
not, then we really have a problem.
--Joshua
"Mark T. Dame" wrote:
>
> "Mark T
> "SP" == Saar Picker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SP> can you do:
SP>
SP> # no handlers
SP>
Try "SetHandler default-handler" inside your location.
Not tested, but in theory... ;-)
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
no need to replace the preloading of
Apache::RegistryLoader with Apache::Registry - you can (and probably should)
preload them both.
the discussion on this issue started a few months ago -
just check the archives at
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/modperl
- I'm not sure of the title o
Saar Picker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there was a way to remove a mod_perl handler from a
> location beneath a location where the handler was set.
>
> So if you have:
>
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlHandler My::Module
>
>
> can you do:
I
preload Apache::Registry, replacing RegistryLoader, and it works
indentically. Interesting. Can you point me to where in the archives
this is doc'ed? I searched using Apache::RegistryLoader, but didn't find
this specifically. I'd like to learn what I can about
it.
And
I'll check ou
Hi,
I was wondering if there was a way to remove a mod_perl handler from a
location beneath a location where the handler was set.
So if you have:
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler My::Module
can you do:
# no handlers
I've tried the above and it doesn't seem to remove My::Module::handler
cool. thanks for the info
--
James Gosnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#1727569
http://premed.dhs.org
I'm in the 'start up' phase of trying to use AuthCookie trying to get
the sample test scripts to work (v 2.006) with an existing mod_perl
1.21 installation
when I click the "Get the protected document" link, it get the nice
little login page (login.pl), but when I enter the credentials or
any
this problem with Apache::Registry is well documented
in the archives - I really didn't test it to see if it affected RegistryLoader
as well, but it sounds the same...
try using the current cvs version - it should have
the problem licked. If you don't want to use a development version, try
I have a plain-old
CGI script configured to be loaded with Apache::Registry
myscript.pl>SetHandler
perl-scriptPerlHandler Apache::RegistryOptions ExecCGIPerlSendHeader
On
In this
configuration, I see the BEGIN block of my script get executed twice per child
process. If I add the line "Pe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
> yes, they take up resources from your system and don't give
> back. Also, some `crazy' ones may eat 99% of CPU power.
> In a normal setup you shouldn't have any of those.
>
That depends on the defunc-ness... If
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> what options did you give mod_perl's Makefile.PL?
perl Makefile.PL \
APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache/ \
APACHE_SRC=/usr/local/apache/src\
DO_HTTPD=1 \
USE_APACI=1 \
APACI_ARGS='--enable-module=rewrite --enable-module=so
--enable-module=proxy' \
Hi James!
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, James Gosnell wrote:
> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
yes, they take up resources from your system and don't give
back. Also, some `crazy' ones may eat 99% of CPU power.
In a normal setup you shouldn't have any of those.
-- teodor-perl-beginn
> "JG" == James Gosnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JG> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
How long to they stick around? Are you talking about zombies or some
other "defunct"-ness?
They should go away after a few seconds, when the parent get a chance
to reap them, assum
At 10:00 PM 04/12/00 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
>
>What state was the process in?
'S' sleeping, waiting for some event.
% ps -p3732
S USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSSSTIMETIME COMMAND
S nobody4 3732 7815 0.0 0.2 7232 3656 16:06:590:00 httpd.mod
>Disk wait (D in ps
What state was the process in?
There are only two states that a process can be in that won't respond to -9:
Zombie (Z in ps), in which case the process is already dead and Apache didn't wait on
it
properly. This isn't a problem just ignore it unless you can reproduce it in
which case report it
>
> UndefOnReload should be obsolete now that Perl 5.005+ does not spit out
> mandatory warnings when redefining constant subroutines. that's what
> UndefOnReload was introduced for. do you need it for something else?
>
Nope, this is my first mod_perl project using 5.005 and I
didn't know abo
At 10:49 PM 04/12/00 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed on the Apache server-status report a child that is stuck in "G"
>> (Gracefully finishing) after a SIGUSR1 today. Twelve hours ago.
>
>this could be perl_destruct() hanging whi
on 4/12/00 6:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is my address in there
See -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- FCCJ * 501 W State St * Jacksonville, Fl 32202 * 904/632-3089 -
> I have no real conclusion to reach, except that it seems to be leaking
> files.
Well, I wanted to write Apache::FileLeak or an extension to
Apache::VMonitor to show the opened file descriptors, the files and the
processes that have opened them, but this requires a root access unless
you want to
Ok. So I've installed lsof, although I'm a little unclear on how to use it.
Right now I'm pretty brute force. Here's what I execute:
lsof | grep httpd | grep myuser | wc -l
This (hopefully) gives me the number of files that my httpd children (owner
"myuser") have open.
When I first file up ap
> Should I be conscerned about httpd defunct processes?
Yes, you will find the answer in
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Forking_and_Executing_Subprocess
__
Stas Bekman | JAm_pH--Just Another m
> This leads me to believe that the Rewrite engine is ignored when an
> Alias kicks in, otherwise the *.shtml files would be bounced back to
> the back-end server where they get properly expanded. Normally, this
> is ok for me since everything else in the aliased directory is an
> image which I w
> > Make test fails at the "warming up" stage with Error "9". The httpd is
> > actually running when the make test fails as I can telnet to port 8529 and
> > do a "GET /". However, it returns a 403 permission denied message. I am
> > doing all this as root. The server runs as user nobody, group
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Honza Pazdziora wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:58:47PM +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >
> >SetHandler perl-script
> >PerlHandler Apache::OutputChain Apache::GzipChain \
> >Apache::Buffer Apache::PassFile
> >
> >
> > This
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Gagan Prakash wrote:
> Thanks everyone. I did check the listing at
> perl.apache.org but many fo the organization appear to
> be resellers. I have the unique situation of setting
> up a site for India and thus need the host to be as
> close as possible to a central internet n
55 matches
Mail list logo
