> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Horrocks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 January 2001 23:37
> To: Gunther Birznieks
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mod_perl list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl
> withscripts that contain un-shared
I understand that mod_jk is more efficient than mod_jserv. My sysadmin has
not complained about any problems integrating mod_perl or mod_jk (but then
mod_jk is in the front-end as stated below where mod_perl is in the backend
apache server).
At 01:18 AM 1/18/2001 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>-
Due to a number of notes about how hard it was to install this beast, I've
really worked hard this time to get all of the wrinkles out of the
installer and I think its pretty good now.
This release (actually 1.05, but I didn't announce that here) adds
get_headers() to get a list of the returned h
I know we've been over this before, but I think I've forgotten!
How do I detect if Apache::Log got compiled in a module's Makefile.PL ?
I can't do eval("use Apache::Log;") because Apache/Log.pm gets installed
regardless, its just that the Log.so doesn't get compiled. So, how do I do
it?
--
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
>
>> i and others have written on the list before, that pushing apache
>> children into swap causes a rapid downward spiral in performance. I
>> don't think that MaxClients is the right way to limit the # of
>> children.
I've done both mod_perl and mod_jserv compiled and working on the same
server..
I think it was a 2.5 meg httpd ;)
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Terry Newnham wrote:
> > My boss has asked me to set up a web server on Solaris 8 with mod_perl
> > and (if possible) Java servlet capabilities as well. Has an
i think tuning like this is available already.
probably something like:
MinSpareServers 100
MaxSpareServers 110
StartServers 100
MaxClients 110
i haven't checked the source code to see if these values
might drive apache a little crazy (such a small range to work
in) , but it seems like the above
I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, but I searched the archives for
this patch and found no direct answers, only references to the current
modperl in CVS. I extracted the relevant pieces into a patch and thought
other people would have the same problem and would benefit from this patch.
So t
you just needed mod_perl-1.24_01.
you can get it at:
http://perl.apache.org/dist/
apparently the underscore in the patch level keeps it
from showing up as the latest release in CPAN.
cliff
Dave Dykstra wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, but I searched the archives for
> this pa
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
> you just needed mod_perl-1.24_01.
>
> you can get it at:
> http://perl.apache.org/dist/
>
> apparently the underscore in the patch level keeps it
> from showing up as the latest release in CPAN.
Do we have anything holding us up from releasing 1
(In the post below, 'STDIN', 'STDOUT', and 'STDERR' refer to Perl
filehandles, while 'stdin', 'stdout', and 'stderr' refer to Perl file
descriptors.)
During migration of a web application server from Perl 5.00503 to Perl
5.6, we discovered a bug in mod_perl 1.23 and above. Under Perl 5.6,
mod_p
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Do we have anything holding us up from releasing 1.25 ?
same stuff i mentioned last week when vivek asked. but more likely to be
ready next week.
Recently, we encountered an odd problem with mod_perl 1.24 and Oracle. We
were using mod_perl as an Apache DSO. The application server we were
debugging would execute database queries fine for a few minutes, and then
queries would start failing with the following Oracle error message:
ORA-0
Hi folks!
I have just seted mod_perl with apache and i am using embperl too.
I am worried about security concerns for mod_perl.
How can i limit, for instance, the amount of memory used for embperl?
the ammount of time allowed for a perl code to spend. With php is easy,
there is directives like
> This doesn't affect the argument, because the core of it is that:
>
> a) the CPU will not completely process a single task all at once; instead,
> it will divide its time _between_ the tasks
> b) tasks do not arrive at regular intervals
> c) tasks take varying amounts of time to complete
> Hello Sam and others
>
> If I haven't overseen, nobody so far really mentioned fastcgi. I'm
> asking myself why you reinvented the wheel. I summarize the
> differences I see:
>
> + perl scripts are more similar to standard CGI ones than with
> FastCGI (downside: see next point)
Agr
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stephen Anderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withsc
ripts
My insanely simple and useful module Apache::DumpHeaders got a few
more tiny iterations. One of these days I'll update the
documentation and call it 1.00. It is after all more than a year
since I adopted Doug's then 10 line handler. :)
The URL
http://develooper.com/code/Apache::DumpHeaders
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
[...]
> This release (actually 1.05, but I didn't announce that here) adds
> get_headers() to get a list of the returned headers from the request in
> the order they came in. I believe some people here asked for that.
Ah, that makes me feel bad. Chris en
[Sorry for the list intrusion if I'm barking in wrong forum. We use
mysqltool under mod_perl internally while developing database
backed mod_perl apps, and have generally heard that other people find it
very useful too, so .. ]
MysqlTool provides a web interface for managing one or more mysql se
We have a Perl CGI application that used to run on a Netscape server.
It was using a proprietary system to compile once and run many.
We recently moved to Apache, but we are having problems with page
loading and reloading.
With a Netscape (4.7) browser when you first load a page (not cached)
it u
21 matches
Mail list logo
