We have a Perl CGI application that used to run on a Netscape server.
It was using a proprietary system to compile once and run many.
We recently moved to Apache, but we are having problems with page
loading and reloading.
With a Netscape (4.7) browser when you first load a page (not cached)
it u
[Sorry for the list intrusion if I'm barking in wrong forum. We use
mysqltool under mod_perl internally while developing database
backed mod_perl apps, and have generally heard that other people find it
very useful too, so .. ]
MysqlTool provides a web interface for managing one or more mysql se
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
[...]
> This release (actually 1.05, but I didn't announce that here) adds
> get_headers() to get a list of the returned headers from the request in
> the order they came in. I believe some people here asked for that.
Ah, that makes me feel bad. Chris en
My insanely simple and useful module Apache::DumpHeaders got a few
more tiny iterations. One of these days I'll update the
documentation and call it 1.00. It is after all more than a year
since I adopted Doug's then 10 line handler. :)
The URL
http://develooper.com/code/Apache::DumpHeaders
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Horrocks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stephen Anderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withsc
ripts
> Hello Sam and others
>
> If I haven't overseen, nobody so far really mentioned fastcgi. I'm
> asking myself why you reinvented the wheel. I summarize the
> differences I see:
>
> + perl scripts are more similar to standard CGI ones than with
> FastCGI (downside: see next point)
Agr
> This doesn't affect the argument, because the core of it is that:
>
> a) the CPU will not completely process a single task all at once; instead,
> it will divide its time _between_ the tasks
> b) tasks do not arrive at regular intervals
> c) tasks take varying amounts of time to complete
Hi folks!
I have just seted mod_perl with apache and i am using embperl too.
I am worried about security concerns for mod_perl.
How can i limit, for instance, the amount of memory used for embperl?
the ammount of time allowed for a perl code to spend. With php is easy,
there is directives like
Recently, we encountered an odd problem with mod_perl 1.24 and Oracle. We
were using mod_perl as an Apache DSO. The application server we were
debugging would execute database queries fine for a few minutes, and then
queries would start failing with the following Oracle error message:
ORA-0
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Do we have anything holding us up from releasing 1.25 ?
same stuff i mentioned last week when vivek asked. but more likely to be
ready next week.
(In the post below, 'STDIN', 'STDOUT', and 'STDERR' refer to Perl
filehandles, while 'stdin', 'stdout', and 'stderr' refer to Perl file
descriptors.)
During migration of a web application server from Perl 5.00503 to Perl
5.6, we discovered a bug in mod_perl 1.23 and above. Under Perl 5.6,
mod_p
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
> you just needed mod_perl-1.24_01.
>
> you can get it at:
> http://perl.apache.org/dist/
>
> apparently the underscore in the patch level keeps it
> from showing up as the latest release in CPAN.
Do we have anything holding us up from releasing 1
you just needed mod_perl-1.24_01.
you can get it at:
http://perl.apache.org/dist/
apparently the underscore in the patch level keeps it
from showing up as the latest release in CPAN.
cliff
Dave Dykstra wrote:
> I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, but I searched the archives for
> this pa
I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, but I searched the archives for
this patch and found no direct answers, only references to the current
modperl in CVS. I extracted the relevant pieces into a patch and thought
other people would have the same problem and would benefit from this patch.
So t
i think tuning like this is available already.
probably something like:
MinSpareServers 100
MaxSpareServers 110
StartServers 100
MaxClients 110
i haven't checked the source code to see if these values
might drive apache a little crazy (such a small range to work
in) , but it seems like the above
I've done both mod_perl and mod_jserv compiled and working on the same
server..
I think it was a 2.5 meg httpd ;)
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Terry Newnham wrote:
> > My boss has asked me to set up a web server on Solaris 8 with mod_perl
> > and (if possible) Java servlet capabilities as well. Has an
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
>
>> i and others have written on the list before, that pushing apache
>> children into swap causes a rapid downward spiral in performance. I
>> don't think that MaxClients is the right way to limit the # of
>> children.
I know we've been over this before, but I think I've forgotten!
How do I detect if Apache::Log got compiled in a module's Makefile.PL ?
I can't do eval("use Apache::Log;") because Apache/Log.pm gets installed
regardless, its just that the Log.so doesn't get compiled. So, how do I do
it?
--
Due to a number of notes about how hard it was to install this beast, I've
really worked hard this time to get all of the wrinkles out of the
installer and I think its pretty good now.
This release (actually 1.05, but I didn't announce that here) adds
get_headers() to get a list of the returned h
I understand that mod_jk is more efficient than mod_jserv. My sysadmin has
not complained about any problems integrating mod_perl or mod_jk (but then
mod_jk is in the front-end as stated below where mod_perl is in the backend
apache server).
At 01:18 AM 1/18/2001 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>-
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Horrocks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 17 January 2001 23:37
> To: Gunther Birznieks
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mod_perl list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl
> withscripts that contain un-shared
21 matches
Mail list logo
