unsubscribe sam@omatis.com

2001-04-30 Thread Samuel Lellouche
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Samuel Lellouche - Omatis Expert Systèmes, réseaux et securité E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 01 53 14 59 14 / 01 53 14 59 31

Re: Environment variables in startup.pl

2001-04-30 Thread darren chamberlain
Scott Alexander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 04/27/2001: Should this work in a startup.pl file my $hostname = $ENV{HOSTNAME} ; from the prompt I can write echo $HOSTNAME and get the correct hostname of the server. But from within startup.pl I don't get it.

Re: IPC:Open3 does not work under mod_perl/1.25, perl5.6.0?

2001-04-30 Thread Peter Reif
Thanks! This works for me, I don't have Apache::Filter loaded, but the effect is the same. My new code: my $stdin = tied *STDIN; my $stdout = tied *STDOUT; untie *STDIN; untie *STDOUT; my $child = open3 ($cgi_in, $cgi_out, $cgi_error, $filename); tie *STDIN, ref $stdin, $stdin; tie *STDOUT, ref

mod_perl/IPC feedback needed

2001-04-30 Thread Eric Cholet
Folks, I'm looking for some feedback regarding what IPC techniques are being used in conjunction with mod_perl. I know about IPC::Shareable, IPC::ShareLite. What other IPC modules/techniques are you using? Or not using because they don't work/aren't stable/whatever. I'm interested in any

[DIGEST] mod_perl digest 04/28/01

2001-04-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
-- mod_perl digest April 22, 2001 - April 28, 2001 -- Recent happenings in the mod_perl world... Features

Re: an unusual [job request] + taking mod_perl to the commercial world

2001-04-30 Thread Bakki Kudva
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:52:05 +0800 Gunther Birznieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I completely agree with the assertion that applications sell the underlying technology. History teaches us that to be indisputable. Also while applications should be an overall part of the vision, it may not have to

Re: CORE::format() and CORE::write() under 5.6.x

2001-04-30 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: cool, but this section in the guide was stating the CORE::format() doesn't work. And it's still doesn't under mod_perl. So doesn't CORE::write(). Right, but it would be nice to point to an alternative. The

Re: CORE::format() and CORE::write() under 5.6.x

2001-04-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: cool, but this section in the guide was stating the CORE::format() doesn't work. And it's still doesn't under mod_perl. So doesn't CORE::write(). Right, but

Re: CORE::format() and CORE::write() under 5.6.x

2001-04-30 Thread Ken Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: cool, but this section in the guide was stating the CORE::format() doesn't work. And it's still doesn't under mod_perl. So doesn't CORE::write(). Right, but it would be

Re: an unusual [job request] + taking mod_perl to the commercial world

2001-04-30 Thread John D Groenveld
Often quite a number of developers are all at work, and they don't all merit the kind of trust that mod_perl requires. See Phillippe Chiasson's talk @ ApacheCon. Lots of developers checking out release controlled Apache, perl, and application. Neat stuff. John [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CORE::format() and CORE::write() under 5.6.x

2001-04-30 Thread Stas Bekman
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Ken Williams wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: cool, but this section in the guide was stating the CORE::format() doesn't work. And it's still doesn't under mod_perl. So

forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies during a redirect. boy, this is really getting to me. using apache 1.3.9 on debian 2.2/potato in trying to implement the concept of the Apache::Ticket*.pm modules from the Apache Modules (eagle) book in chapter 6 (on pages 304+) i'm

RE: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forbidden vs. cookie [snip] # this don't work so not, neither: $r-header_out(-cookie=$cookie);

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Landrum
i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies during a redirect. boy, this is really getting to me. using apache 1.3.9 on debian 2.2/potato in trying to implement the concept of the Apache::Ticket*.pm modules from the Apache Modules (eagle) book in chapter 6 (on pages 304+) i'm

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Ken Y. Clark
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, will trillich wrote: Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:31:02 -0500 From: will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forbidden vs. cookie i could really use some dumbed-down tips on setting cookies during a redirect. boy, this is really getting to me.

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Tim Tompkins
Here's another option which may not be exactly what you're looking for, but it will work: Once you've performed all validation and are ready to redirect them with the cookie, rather than attempting the redirect with http headers, just output a simple processing page with the redirect url in an

Re: Help -- Internal Server Error after mod_perl and new apache insta ll on HP-UX 10.20.

2001-04-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, MCALLISTER,RONAN (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote: HP-UX 10.20 and compiling from source. Did you compile your Perl? my httpd.conf Where? Have you looked in the archives for HP-UX? I believe there have been successes in the recent past, and it may have been a bit

Apache::Registry - a thought

2001-04-30 Thread Pete Jordan
I've been off this list for over a year, so I may be covering ground that I've failed to find in the archives, but whatever... I've had occasion to examine the internals of Apache::Registry recently[1] and have been reminded of the unfeasably long package names that it generates for scripts.

Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
[1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/perlexception/ for the curious. Since I'm doing the mod_perl exception handling talk at TPC, I feel obligated to ask

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/perlexception/ for the curious. Since I'm doing the mod_perl exception

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/perlexception/ for

Installation issue

2001-04-30 Thread alan arbizu
Hi folks... I've got an issue here that all the rtfm'ing on my part has not been able to resolve :/ Here's the setup RH 6.1 Apache 1.3.19 mod_ssl 2.8.1 mod_perl 1.25 php 4.0.4pl1 building all from source So... I first configured mod_ssl by pointing it at the apache source... Then I

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: [1] for my Perl exception package (yes, another one :) which, in its development version, now mostly does the Right Thing for mod_perl. See

Re: Installation issue

2001-04-30 Thread alan arbizu
Hmm.. i just got it to build ok on RH 7.0.. I'll see if I can just use those binaries... oh.. i did forget to mention the 6.1 box was an SMP kernel. Not sure if that could be an issue, but thought it could be important /a alan arbizu wrote: Hi folks... I've got an issue here that all

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a string, but 5.mumble gave us die() with a reference to an object and at that moment the system was complete. The creation of a rational exception object type is left to the discretion

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Pete Jordan
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't seem any different from Error.pm to me, except in syntax. Maybe you could expand on why/where it is different? OK, yes, it *is* very similar in principle - I would perhaps have been better to have added to Graham's code, but I suffer from

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a string, but 5.mumble gave us die() with a reference to an object and at that moment the system was complete. The creation of a rational

RE: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Steve Coco
Title: RE: Exception modules unsubscribe please- thanks -Original Message- From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:29 PM To: Jeffrey W. Baker Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Exception modules On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: I have learned that errors from down in the call stack are very rarely conditionally recoverable. If I call obj-method(), and it throws an exception, there are few situations where the cause of the exception matters at all. In most cases I will

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Ken Y. Clark wrote: Here is some code I've used in the past in a mod_perl app to set a cookie and do a redirect at the same time. I believe it works for most browsers -- or at least this code has been working for over a year and I haven't heard too

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forbidden vs. cookie [snip] # this don't work so hot, neither:

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread Robert Landrum
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forbidden vs. cookie [snip] # this don't work so hot, neither:

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 03:24 PM 4/30/01 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: Yes precisely. It used to be that you could only die() with a string, but 5.mumble gave us die() with a reference to an object and at that

Re: forbidden vs. cookie

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:54:24PM -0400, Robert Landrum wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:46:03PM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: From: will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forbidden vs. cookie [snip] # this

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread brian moseley
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of any program I have written that branches on the type of exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch in CP Web Mail, the underlying libraries throw typed exceptions so that the

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Paul Lindner
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 05:47:03PM -0700, brian moseley wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of any program I have written that branches on the type of exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch in CP Web

PerlAccessHandler -- struggling and drowning

2001-04-30 Thread will trillich
Eeyore here, again, less happy than ever. S.O.S. okay. i try to use the Ticket*.pm modules from the book (chapter 6) verbatim and they work well for well-behaved browsers. to widen the workability (i.e. to make it functional for badly-mannered browsers*) i'm trying some workarounds. this is a

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
on 4/30/01 8:47 PM, brian moseley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: type of exception. Right now I cannot in fact think of any program I have written that branches on the type of exception. Java encourages this with multiple catch in CP Web Mail,

Re: Exception modules

2001-04-30 Thread brian moseley
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Perrin Harkins wrote: I've tried that, but last time I went with more general classes of exceptions containing unique error IDs (defined in a constants module) to indicate the exact type. Not as Java-like, but it did save me from creating dozens of classes with no

RE: cvs commit: modperl/Apache Apache.pm

2001-04-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: modperl/Apache Apache.pm dougm 01/04/25 22:30:46 Modified:.Changes Apache Apache.pm

cvs commit: modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl modperl_global.h

2001-04-30 Thread dougm
dougm 01/04/30 18:53:53 Modified:src/modules/perl modperl_global.h Log: fix for non-threaded Perls Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +2 -0 modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/modperl_global.h Index: modperl_global.h