Hallo everybody,
I made an installation of mod_perl with apxs and everything seems to work
fairly well BUT I cannot run make test! When I try to, I get the message
Can't make test with apxs (yet). Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Carlo.
Hi everyone,
I have a problem installing mod_perl 1.26 with Apache 1.3.24. When I do
the make test I'm getting this in the end before it
aborts:
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/mod_perl-1.26/Util'
cp t/conf/mod_perl_srm.conf t/conf/srm.conf
../apache_1.3.24/src/httpd -f
Hi Einar,
I just did some digging in my mailbox and found the following:
(btw - mod_perl 1.26 has been around for some time, and it looks like you're using it
- but not in your spec. list)
// Nicolai
--- OLD MESSAGE ---
Hi,
For what it's worth it, I always have to add use URI::URL; to the
Einar Roheim wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a problem installing mod_perl 1.26 with Apache 1.3.24. When I do
the make test I'm getting this in the end before it aborts:
You have a mismatching version of LWP and URI packages, update both and
the problem should disappear.
make[1]: Leaving
Hi,
thanks to all of your help, I found a way to achieve the following
goal:
- have a couple of instances of a web application running under the
same (name based) virtual host, under different Locations each
using a different configuration than the others
- having backwards compatibillity
Hi there!
I wonder if it is possible to have two distinct installations of mod_perl
on the same machine, let's say one made as root user and another as
normal user.
Thanks for helping,
Carlo.
At 17:00 4/23/2002 +0800, you wrote:
Einar Roheim wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a problem installing mod_perl 1.26 with Apache 1.3.24. When I do
the make test I'm getting this in the end before it aborts:
You have a mismatching version of LWP and URI packages, update both and
the problem should
Sören Stuckenbrock wrote:
Hi,
thanks to all of your help, I found a way to achieve the following
goal:
Nice, but see below
somescript.pl
---
#!/usr/bin/perl -wT
use strict;
use lib .;
use lib_netContest;
use DBI;
use CGI (qw:standard:);
use vars
Carlo Giomini wrote:
Hi there!
I wonder if it is possible to have two distinct installations of mod_perl
on the same machine, let's say one made as root user and another as
normal user.
Of course, see the installation chapter in the guide.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:28:24 +0200 (MEST)
Carlo Giomini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I wonder if it is possible to have two distinct installations of mod_perl
on the same machine, let's say one made as root user and another as
normal user.
Thanks for helping,
Carlo.
You
Nice, but see below
somescript.pl
---
#!/usr/bin/perl -wT
use strict;
use lib .;
use lib_netContest;
use DBI;
use CGI (qw:standard:);
use vars qw(%c $config_module $db_handle);
my $r = shift;
if (defined $r $r-dir_config('ConfigMod')) {
In my httpd.conf I have set 'PerlSetVar UseStrict 1' because I always use
sctict anyway and I see in the docs that this might become the default
too. So I always declare my variables with my().
Suppose I have a master ASP file that includes other scripts and these
other scripts need access to
Simon Oliver wrote:
The Apache::ASP mailing list is at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... please subscribe
to it to post questions on this topic by emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache::ASP dev issues are officially off-topic on the mod_perl list now.
More below on this issue...
In my httpd.conf I have set
I wonder if it is possible to have two distinct installations of mod_perl
on the same machine, let's say one made as root user and another as
normal user.
Also see Stas' article, Installing mod_perl without superuser
privileges, at http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/04/10/mod_perl.html
--Ade.
Sören Stuckenbrock wrote:
Nice, but see below
somescript.pl
---
#!/usr/bin/perl -wT
use strict;
use lib .;
use lib_netContest;
use DBI;
use CGI (qw:standard:);
use vars qw(%c $config_module $db_handle);
my $r = shift;
if (defined $r $r-dir_config('ConfigMod'))
Since I have been unable to use Open3 effectively on my Win32, I am looking
for some alternatives.
BTW, one of my goals is to make the scripts relatively platform independent
-- and therefore I am leaving Open3 and its IPC::Run cousin behind.
I have a set of f77 libraries that I know can be
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Fran Fabrizio wrote:
It seems that even if AuthCookie returns a FORBIDDEN with a custom_error
page set, the $r-notes() don't propagate. Does apache consider the
display of the custom_response page to be a completely new request?
Its a subrequest, so the notes shold be
Stas Bekman wrote:
Einar Roheim wrote:
At 17:00 4/23/2002 +0800, you wrote:
Einar Roheim wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a problem installing mod_perl 1.26 with Apache 1.3.24. When I
do the make test I'm getting this in the end before it aborts:
You have a mismatching version
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the
IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention...
I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort):
$r-custom_response(FORBIDDEN=File size exceeds quota.);
And kept getting errors
At 19:29 23.04.2002, Issac Goldstand wrote:
Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the
IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention...
I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort):
$r-custom_response(FORBIDDEN=File size exceeds quota.);
And kept
At 19:38 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Reposting a question (and the answer) that geoff and I discussed in the
IRC room, as I think it's worthwhile to mention...
I had the following line of code (actually many of the sort):
$r-custom_response(FORBIDDEN=File size
Stas,
First, there was no mod_perl 1.2x installed on this machine. I didn't think
I would need it, but I'm guessing.
This was as you say. The Location /perl didn't aggree with the registry
loaded in startup. That fixed that problem but now it complains about
CGI.pm as follows:
[Tue Apr 23
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
Well, this one is exported by Apache::Constants, so if you don't want to do
$FORBIDDEN = FORBIDDEN;
somewhere at the top of your code, you're bound to continue using
constants, right?
That's still safer. I used the constants pragma on a big project and I
saw
Does anyone of the list have experience with using hub.org's virtual
machine setup for a mod_perl site?
I'm doing a proof of concept site for a new business that needs to
be hosted somewhere other than my machine at home for people to bang
on, and I don't want to pay for a dedicated server
Can anyone tell us if the Apache::Constants all just standard HTTP
response codes, or are some of them actually Apache-specific?
there are over 90 constants in Apache::Constants, which range from HTTP
constants (like FORBIDDEN for 403) to Apache specific ones (like
DECLINED for -1 and
At 19:51 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
Well, this one is exported by Apache::Constants, so if you don't want to do
$FORBIDDEN = FORBIDDEN;
somewhere at the top of your code, you're bound to continue using
constants, right?
That's still safer. I used the constants
Chuck Goehring wrote:
Stas,
First, there was no mod_perl 1.2x installed on this machine. I didn't think
I would need it, but I'm guessing.
This was as you say. The Location /perl didn't aggree with the registry
loaded in startup. That fixed that problem but now it complains about
Silvio Wanka wrote:
BTW, have you tried the latest mod_perl CVS? I think your problem has
been solved long time ago. Sometimes I forget that others don't use the
cvs version all the time :)
From Changes:
=item 1.26_01-dev
...
require URI::URL to work with newer libwww-perl
...
Stas
You're right. I'm getting impatient and jumping ahead. Pasted directly
from your post, restarted Apache and get same thing
[Tue Apr 23 12:16:54 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2560
[Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Child process is running
[Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002]
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
I suppose Apache::Constants could have been extended to return globals
if requested... But is there really any gain in that?
Only in that people will not get tripped up by the possible bugs that
using subroutines as constants causes. I guess Apache::Constants is
At 22:04 23.04.2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
I suppose Apache::Constants could have been extended to return globals if
requested... But is there really any gain in that?
Only in that people will not get tripped up by the possible bugs that
using subroutines as constants
Hi,
For the mod_perl site I've started collecting different applications which
run under mod_perl (either required or under Apache::Registry as a
complement to CGI). I was thinking more in the way of things like content
management systems, entire applications, we already know about all our
Hi there,
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Vuillemot, Ward W wrote:
Is it possible to write a simple C wrapper to the f77 library, and then link
to Perl as a module?
Have a look at Inline.pm.
73,
Ged.
Certainly. You can run as many separate apache instances as you want,
each with it's own configuration. These cannot share the same IP/port
directly, but If you want these to share the same server name space then
you can set up an apache instance which proxies requests to different
servers as
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Silvio Wanka wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Einar Roheim wrote:
At 17:00 4/23/2002 +0800, you wrote:
Einar Roheim wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a problem installing mod_perl 1.26 with Apache 1.3.24. When I
do the make test I'm getting this in the end
Stas/Everyone,
To follow up. With the starting and stopping of Apache and looking at the
log, I see entries like Child 1032: Waiting for 250 worker threads to
exit. I was gettiong Low virtual memory errors from Win/2000, so I added
ThreadsPerChild 24 to the http.conf. This makes it stop
Chuck Goehring wrote:
You're right. I'm getting impatient and jumping ahead. Pasted directly
from your post, restarted Apache and get same thing
[Tue Apr 23 12:16:54 2002] [notice] Parent: Created child process 2560
[Tue Apr 23 12:16:58 2002] [notice] Child 2560: Child process is running
Chuck Goehring wrote:
Stas/Everyone,
To follow up. With the starting and stopping of Apache and looking at the
log, I see entries like Child 1032: Waiting for 250 worker threads to
exit. I was gettiong Low virtual memory errors from Win/2000, so I added
ThreadsPerChild 24 to the
38 matches
Mail list logo
