Static vs. DSO on Linux specifically

for the Linux environment, what are the downsides of running mod_perl as a DSO? (Pointers to the FM so I can R it would be fine.) -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http

Re: Static vs. DSO on Linux specifically

Thomas Klausner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi! On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:26:32AM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: So, specifically for the Linux environment, what are the downsides of running mod_perl as a DSO? (Pointers to the FM so I can R it would be fine.) Did you take a look

Re: [mod_perl2] PerlChildInitHandlers with multiple (Win32) threads

right; though I'm convinced enough that the sites I design depend on it. (One obvious answer is there are big wins for us in having session keys that *aren't* randomly chosen). -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http

Re: E-commerce payment systems for apache/mod_perl

Gedanken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2 Jul 2002, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: Any obvious choices for a relatively small-scale e-commerce payment processing system for a server running apache / mod_perl? There are a few 'clearing house' type services to which one can subscribe

Re: Re[2]: E-commerce payment systems for apache/mod_perl

. They are the only processing company that I have seen that really actively supports Open Source. This looks very promising, thanks for the specific pointer. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net

Re: [OT] Better Linux server platform: Redhat or SuSe?

that myself and having endless trouble, probably with cable wiring, but especially for unattended systems you *really* want the cleanest shutdowns possible. Any other oddities one should be aware of? Well, it's so much what I'm used to that I may not be aware of them. -- David Dyer-Bennet

Re: [OT] Better Linux server platform: Redhat or SuSe?

want the added security of mirroring, I think the software RAID is a viable option. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes

E-commerce payment systems for apache/mod_perl

Any obvious choices for a relatively small-scale e-commerce payment processing system for a server running apache / mod_perl? -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http

Re: Optional HTTP Authentication ?

what the people with the checkbook say, but we shouldn't be just rolling over on cookies; we should be arguing the point strenuously. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http

Re: mod_perl 1.99 on Win2k with Apache2

Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm +1 on using a preset 'Reply-to:' header. httpd-dev seems to use it solely for the reason you describe. I'm all for helping people to reply back to the list. Ask, can we please have this header set? Can we please *not*? -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL

Re: apache 1.3.26 reverse proxy

to me a difference in the process structure or what how they wait could have horrible effects on the load average numbers while actually improving performance. Or not. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer

Re: Optional HTTP Authentication ?

. Again it doesn't always make implementation easy :-/ True enough; and my proposal is a bit harder to implement. I'm a big fan of cookies myself, for the thing they were made for, namely session tracking. I share your frustration :-(. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti

Re: What gives with $m-time in 1.10?

Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 29 June 2002 at 10:33:10 +0200 At 02:47 29.06.2002, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: It's in the doc for 1.05, not in the doc for 1.10, and I can't find any reference to it in the ChangeLog on the website, and it's not mentioned in the UPGRADE file

Access to form parameters (POST)

to not have to list them all in some cases, and have a lot of optional ones in other cases. -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes

Getting component arguments from a %def subcomponent

the component arguments directly in a subcomponent, though? -- David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED] / New TMDA anti-spam in test John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes/ New Dragaera mailing lists