On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:48 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> I did have it set up that way at one point. it worked quite nicely as
>> long as I made the singleton in a subclass of the main Factory (which
>> might be shared
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 09:11 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> sorry: i wasn't very clear, was I? I am using a method handler, but I
>> want to pass an object of another class to it each time it is called.
>> The objec
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 21:30 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
>>
>>> At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>>>> but I can
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, at 08:18 PM, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
> At 20:47 02.10.2002, william ross wrote:
>> but I can't find anything to tell me how to do it. I feel sure I'm
>> missing something really obvious here?
>
> You can configure objects inst
hello,
I've been off-list for a while, so please forgive (and direct) me if
this is a tired subject.
In short, i'd like to pass through another object on method invocation,
in addition to the apache request. Ideally the (method)handler would
look something like:
sub handler ($$$) {
m
same here, also on 10.1.
I got past that one by forcing the got_storable sub to return 0, just
out of curiosity, and was rewarded with complaints about the absence
of Pod::POM::View::HTML. which is certainly absent.
i imagine that a lot of the people you would most like to respond to
your cha
At 10:44 am -0800 14/11/01, Nick Tonkin wrote:
>No one doubts your commitment to mod_perl, or your hard -- and unpaid
>-- work on the guide and many other things. But if you want to be a leader
>who inspires people to collaborate and work as a team under your
>direction, you'd do well to work on b
