Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Ok, still getting the same errors during "make test". > > One of the first lines of the "perl Makefile.PL --blahblah" shows: > > Configuring Apache/2.0.39 mod_perl/1.99_04 Perl/v5.8.0 > > Does this mean that the make install I did on the Perl/v5.8.0_RC2 didn't > "take"? may

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Zac Morris
When I "perl --version" should it show me 5.8.0 RC2? Thanks, -Zac - Original Message - From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "mod_perl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 20

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Ok, I understand. Maybe some kind of message/logic in the make to tell you > that you have to have specifically x, y, z. Because I honestly DID hear you > say x, y, z but my brain assumed x+, y+, z+ I've updated the README file, which now states what you need. All the troub

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Zac Morris
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "mod_perl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:08 AM Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 > Zac Morris wrote: > > Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS t

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Ok, I went and installed Apache from CVS this time, but it looks like that > installed 2.0.40-dev > > and I'm still getting errors during "make test" of mod_perl 2. Does it have > to be 2.0.39 specifically to compile? Yes, to compile 1.99_04 > Sorry if I'm just not getting

Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-27 Thread Zac Morris
; To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:33 AM Subject: Re: Apache::compat was Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 > > > errors: > > using Apache/2.0.36 (prefork MPM) > > because you must use 2.0.39. > > >

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-26 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Ok, still no luck. Every dependancy has more dependancies all of which go > back and back to mod_perl 1 stuff already being in place > > > My question is, can I download the Apache 1.3 source (don't "make" it), then > run the mod_perl 1 build to get all the pm files in p

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-26 Thread Zac Morris
om: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zac Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:26 PM Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 > Zac Morris wrote: > > Ahhh, ok more clarity. :) > > > > Forgi

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Ahhh, ok more clarity. :) > > Forgive me if I'm just not doing my detective work in poking around for > documentation, but is there a doc that contains all the "kludges" or > "assumed modules" I need to already have in place? All the docs that we have now are at http://perl.

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-25 Thread Zac Morris
Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 11:02 AM Subject: Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 > Zac Morris wrote: > > Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions: > > > > use Apache2(); > > use Apache::compat

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Zac Morris wrote: > Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions: > > use Apache2(); > use Apache::compat; > > and I'm still getting the errors: > > Undefined subroutine &Apache::Module::loaded called at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95. > Compilation failed

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0

2002-06-25 Thread Zac Morris
Yeah, so I've tried these suggestions: use Apache2(); use Apache::compat; and I'm still getting the errors: Undefined subroutine &Apache::Module::loaded called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i386-linux/Apache/compat.pm line 95. Compilation failed in require at ./db_connect_test.pm li

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-23 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 00:49 23.06.2002, Charles Aulds wrote: >At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to: >>1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said, >>Apache::DBI can only work wit

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-22 Thread Charles Aulds
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to: >>1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said, >>   Apache::DBI can only work with that one) >>2) You will probably need to

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-22 Thread Charles Aulds
At 06:41 PM 6/21/02 +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: As Apache::DBI hasn't been tested with mod_perl 2.0 yet, you will need to: 1) make sure you are using the prefork MPM for Apache (as Stas said, Apache::DBI can only work with that one) 2) You will probably need to run mod_per

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 19:46 21.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >>At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: >> >>>I actually have a question along these lines >>> >>>I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with Apache2 >>>and the mod_perl2 beta. >>> >>>That's all workin

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
>> but first you need: >> >> PerlModule Apache2 >> >> or 'use Apache2' in startup.pl. see: >> >http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#Accessing_the_mod_perl_2_0_Modules > >> > > > Nope, he did a "clean" mod_perl 2 install, without MP_INST_APACHE2 I > think... so does

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: > >> I actually have a question along these lines >> >> I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with >> Apache2 >> and the mod_perl2 beta. >> >> That's all working well and my old cgi-bin type stuff wo

Re: Apache::DBI with mod_perl 2.0 (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache::DBI 0.89)

2002-06-21 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 18:26 21.06.2002, Zac Morris wrote: >I actually have a question along these lines > >I'm new to mod_perl myself, and I've just installed a new setup with Apache2 >and the mod_perl2 beta. > >That's all working well and my old cgi-bin type stuff works under mod_perl >great. > >Now I'm trying