> -Original Message-
> From: Ricardas Cepas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Apache::GzipChain & Apache::OutputChain
>
>
> Hi!
>
> What does this error messsage mea
::OutputChain Apache::GzipChain My::Site
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
Platform:
osname=freebsd, osvers=4.3-stable, archname=i386-freebsd
uname='freebsd richard.eu.org 4.3-stable freebsd 4.3-stable #0: sat apr 28
12:13:21 eet 2001 [EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerrad Pierce) wrote:
>Is anybody using GzipChain?
>
>Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
>
>(Other than watching an unreliable browser progress bar)
Note that Apache::Compress is out there too. It's a newer module,
cooperates with Apach
Hi there,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
> lwp-request -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' -e -d
> Or ommit the -d and check for gobbledegook. But it tends to stuff up y
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> Is anybody using GzipChain?
Not in itself, but I'm using AxKit which also does gzip compression.
> Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
Yes, use:
lwp-request -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' -e -d
Or ommit the -d a
Hi again,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> > Is anybody using GzipChain?
> IIRC, Josh said he was.
There are apparently some problems with IE claiming to support it and
then not supporting it. Quote from Josh, edited to preserve anonimity:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using GzipChain?
>
> IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
>
> > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
>
Hi there,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> Is anybody using GzipChain?
IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
> Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
LWP?
73,
Ged.
Is anybody using GzipChain?
Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
(Other than watching an unreliable browser progress bar)
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
>
> > "Drew" == Drew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Drew> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
> Drew> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
> Drew> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper d
> "Drew" == Drew Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Drew> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
Drew> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
Drew> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper display.
Why base it on browser? Won't c
Drew Taylor wrote:
> I have read debates in the past about which browsers will reliably
> accept gzip content. Do you have a list of such browsers? IIRC, it was
> IE that was the most troublesome w/ proper display.
We don't make an explicit blessed browser list, we let the browser
writers tell us
Devin Ben-Hur wrote:
>
> Bruce Lo wrote:
> >
> > I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using Apache::Registry),
>and it was great for reducing the download time (especially over modem). I am
>seriously thinking about using it for our production env
Bruce Lo wrote:
>
> I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using Apache::Registry),
>and it was great for reducing the download time (especially over modem). I am
>seriously thinking about using it for our production environment. However, some
>people are
I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using
Apache::Registry), and it was great for reducing the download ime
(especially over modem). I am seriously thinking about using it for our
production environment. However, some people are concerned about it using
up too much
I tried out Apache::GzipChain for dynamic mod_perl pages (using Apache::Registry), and
it was great for reducing the download time (especially over modem). I am seriously
thinking about using it for our production environment. However, some people are
concerned about it using up too much
On Apr 11, 2000 at 08:36:42 -0400, Paul G. Weiss twiddled the keys to say:
> I'm using Apache::RegistryNG to feed GzipChain. But doesn't
> the chunking occur *after* GzipChain? I've also tried
> Apache::Registry with the same results.
>From the Apache::GzipChain m
2 AM
> To: Paul G. Weiss
> Subject: Re: Apache::GzipChain
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2000 at 08:19:50 -0400, Rick Myers twiddled the
> keys to say:
> >
> > Your suspicion is correct. The problem however lies in
> whatever module
> > your using to feed GzipChain. In my
On Apr 11, 2000 at 07:49:57 -0400, Paul G. Weiss twiddled the keys to say:
> I was playing around with this module and got strange
> results (both with MSIE 5.0 and Netscape 4.6). The
> output is being sent chunked and when I do "view source"
> it appears that the browsers have not received the
>
t;chunk".
When I use lwp-download to read the page and then run
the contents (without the headers) through gunzip then
the complete page is indeed there.
Is there something to using this module that I'm missing?
Is there a way to force Apache to use Apache::GzipChain
but not chunk the output?
-P
On Mar 30, 2000 at 23:20:19 +0200, Honza Pazdziora twiddled the keys to say:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Janning Vygen wrote:
>
> > of the page. calling "view page source" only shows half of the content.
> >
> > It does work with some other and smaller files. With huge files (ab
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:05:47PM +0200, Janning Vygen wrote:
> of the page. calling "view page source" only shows half of the content.
>
> It does work with some other and smaller files. With huge files (about 50k and
> lots of table rows and data) its broken.
>
> does anybody else notice th
on 3/27/00 10:05 AM, Janning Vygen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i´ve just downloaded gzipChain and enjoyed the benefits of fast downloads.
> it works fine with lynx, but doesnt work with netscape 4.7 on linux 2.x
>
> so netscape 4.7 sends a wrong accept-encoding header ??
>
I haven't had any
23 matches
Mail list logo
