On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple
instances of Apache. We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two
separate IPs. These sites rely on mod_perl heavily. Each site
has a unique perl script that handles just about everything.
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dave Baker wrote:
[...]
p.s. The processes could also be large because of suboptimal
coding,
Scalability problems are almost never due to bad code and almost
always due to bad design.
or (if they grow over time) memory leaks
... with possibly that as the exception. :-)
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:40:30PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
1. A hacker with access to a virtual host on a mod_perl Apache can steal
the Apache::DBI database handles of the other virtual
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:40:30PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
1. A hacker with access to a virtual host on a mod_perl Apache can steal
the
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
need to run their own instance of Apache?
I would think so, but that doesn't seem to be you seem to have figured
Hi there,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
need to run their own instance of Apache?
If one Apache is listening to port 80 then no others can. This is why
you will get an error message when you try to start an
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
need to run their own instance of Apache?
If one Apache is listening to port 80 then no others can.
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple instances of Apache.
We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two separate IPs. These sites rely on
mod_perl heavily. Each site has a unique perl script that handles just about
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0600, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple instances of Apache.
We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two separate IPs. These sites rely on
mod_perl heavily. Each site has a unique perl script that handles just about
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jonathan Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Do virtual hosts need their own servers?
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0600, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:24:50 -0400
Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compare the memory requirement two sets of perl scripts against the
memory requirement of doubling the total number of apache processes.
My personal opinion is that the latter will be a lot more expensive in
resources.
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
Apache is set to:
StartServers 10
MaxClients 512
Is that to say that the max number of children is 20 (StartServers +
MaxSpareServers) or 512 (MaxClients)
MaxClients. But if you have 10M unshared in each child and only 500M
of RAM
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
need to run their own instance of Apache?
I've read through http://perl.apache.org/guide/multiuser.html and this is
what I've gathered:
1. A hacker with access to a virtual
13 matches
Mail list logo
