On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> Dear All
>
> This is a little OT - but bear with me.
>
> I am looking for a simple generic server (prefably OO) that I can use
> for my NON OO stuff.
>
> I have writen my own, but I am after ideas
>
> One project
Dear All
This is a little OT - but bear with me.
I am looking for a simple generic server (prefably OO) that I can use
for my NON OO stuff.
I have writen my own, but I am after ideas
One project I've got involves getting HTML (template)files via LWP, and
uploads them into an IPC
ied in subroutines as if
> they were runtime directives, etc. etc. Slashdot has much bigger
> problems than a lack of a "generic server" architecture, IMO ;)
:)
I used slash as an example because I'm working on a similarish commercial
piece of software. And the code is clea
ubroutines as if
> they were runtime directives, etc. etc. Slashdot has much bigger
> problems than a lack of a "generic server" architecture, IMO ;)
>
I do have to agree, as one of the origional authors of Slash, the code
is horrific. On one hand (looking back) there were a lot of t
slashdot.org/code.shtml
It's a horror show, truly. Return values go unchecked, quoting
operators are ignored, subroutine naming conventions are
nonexistent, "use" statements are buried in subroutines as if
they were runtime directives, etc. etc. Slashdot has much bigger
pro
ude them all
in places where they aren't needed.
> Besides that, with a mod_perl enabled generic server rather than an inetd
> server there's no loading config files for each request, no starting a
> process, and Apache 2.0 (and I'm assuming mod_perl) will be availabl
On Sat, 30 Oct 1999, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> According to Matt Sergeant:
>
> > > >Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
> > > >for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
> > > >connections, etc
At 19:57 -0500 1999-10-29, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
> However you didn't explain why you would
>like to replace these typically small and fast programs with
>a 10-20Meg mod_perl process. I can see where having a common
>modular authentication method would be useful, but what else would
>they have
> I don't think this is currently possible with the current Apache, but hear
> me out.
>
> Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
> for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
> connections, etc. It seems to me at
According to Matt Sergeant:
> > >Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
> > >for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
> > >connections, etc. It seems to me at first look this should be possible.
> > >
n to a specific protocol handler. I don't
know
however the extent of the support, e.g. for dispatching to modules.
> > Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not
just
> > >for HTTP - something th
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, James G Smith wrote:
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I don't think this is currently possible with the current Apache, but hear
> >me out.
> >
> >Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
&
socket without
dropping the connection?
James G Smith wrote:
>
> Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
> >for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
> >connections,
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't think this is currently possible with the current Apache, but hear
>me out.
>
>Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
>for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections,
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
>for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
>connections, etc. It seems to me at first look this should be possible.
>
> Am I complet
I don't think this is currently possible with the current Apache, but hear
me out.
Would it be possible to have a generic server, like Apache, but not just
for HTTP - something that could also serve up NNTP connections, FTP
connections, etc. It seems to me at first look this should be pos
16 matches
Mail list logo
