On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Styer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
In Makefile.PL I have:
snip abbreviated makefile code listing
I'm assuming you have more than that... :-)
Yes. :)
It actually looks like this:
package
-Original Message-
From: Michael Styer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi there,
I'm another person in the short but persistent line of people
who can't
seem to get custom configuration directives to work.
:-)
In Makefile.PL I have:
package ConfigModule;
## ... (as
-Original Message-
From: Michael Styer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That's because ConfigModule.pm isn't loaded at the time.
You'd have to
require() it or use() it.
Even when the makefile is declared as 'package ConfigModule;'
initally?
It seems strange that I would need to
I'll look into it, but my sysadmins are worried that
upgrading is going to
break, in strange and obscure ways, the multiple live
commercial sites we
have running on our servers. Are there any resources
available I might be
able to use to reassure them?
No! They have every right
-Original Message-
From: Matt Sergeant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:41 AM
To: 'Michael Styer'; Matt Sergeant
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: More problems with custom config directives (LONG)
[snip]
I'll look into it, but my sysadmins
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
OK, can you describe the problem a little more clearly? The Testing user
file bit doesn't seem to come from anywhere - any ideas where it's coming
from???
I had assumed it was coming from Apache, but your question made me
suspicious. After a little
Don't worry, it's all happening on an isolated development
server, I was
just wondering whether there are any resources that indicate
what things
might break when upgrading from 1.23 to 1.24. But if I can't get this
working soon time pressure will force me to use the
functional but
