Yea, I tried that, but it was still unhappy. There are apparently a
couple of other tweaks that needed to be done. I didn't think too
much about it; after the first error, I went looking for information
and found the patch.
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/textproc/eperl/Makefile
Hi there,
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Todd Finney wrote:
We use ePerl for a fair number of things, and I have yet to run into
something we needed of which it was not capable.
Didn't I read somewhere that there were security concerns?
Just asking.
Ditto.
73,
Ged.
We use ePerl for a fair number of things, and I have yet to run into
something we needed of which it was not capable. What are you
thinking of?
It's not a question of it not being capable, it's just that most people seem
to choose one of the more full-featured tools. There's lots of talk
At 07:47 AM 7/8/01, Ged Haywood wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Todd Finney wrote:
We use ePerl for a fair number of things, and I have yet to run
into
something we needed of which it was not capable.
Didn't I read somewhere that there were security concerns?
There was a fix made in 1998
At 02:40 PM 7/8/01, Perrin Harkins wrote:
We use ePerl for a fair number of things, and I have yet to run
into
something we needed of which it was not capable. What are you
thinking of?
It's not a question of it not being capable, it's just that most
people seem
to choose one of the
