On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dave Baker wrote:
[...]
> p.s. The processes could also be large because of suboptimal
> coding,
Scalability problems are almost never due to bad code and almost
always due to bad design.
> or (if they grow over time) memory leaks
... with possibly that as the exception. :
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple
> instances of Apache. We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two
> separate IPs. These sites rely on mod_perl heavily. Each site
> has a unique perl script that handles just about everything.
> C
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:17:05PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > Ahh, I was assuming a DBI handle lexically scoped to the handler subroutine,
> > > sorry about the confusion.
> >
> > it can be lexically scoped, but it doesn't prevent you from reading fr
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:17:05PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Ahh, I was assuming a DBI handle lexically scoped to the handler subroutine,
> > sorry about the confusion.
>
> it can be lexically scoped, but it doesn't prevent you from reading from
> memory. It's not easy but possible. But thing
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:40:30PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
> > > > 1. A hacker with access to a virtual host on a mod_perl Apache can steal
> >
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:40:30PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
> > > 1. A hacker with access to a virtual host on a mod_perl Apache can steal
> > > the Apache::DBI database handles of the other
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Andy Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 12:54:58PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
> > When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
> > need to run their own instance of Apache?
>
> I would think so, but that doesn't seem to be you seem to have fig
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/16/01, Robert Landrum wrote:
>Sorry for the slightly OT post...
>
>I found something interesting when playing with virtual hosts.
>
>We host anesthesiasafety.net as a virtual host along with serveral
>other domains and some of our users are typing ANESTHESIASAFTY.NET
>and it's
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> Apache is set to:
> StartServers 10
> MaxClients 512
>
> Is that to say that the max number of children is 20 (StartServers +
> MaxSpareServers) or 512 (MaxClients)
MaxClients. But if you have 10M unshared in each child and only 500M
of
Sorry for the slightly OT post...
I found something interesting when playing with virtual hosts.
We host anesthesiasafety.net as a virtual host along with serveral
other domains and some of our users are typing ANESTHESIASAFTY.NET
and it's not matching in the "ServerAlias"es Is there a c
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:24:50 -0400
Dave Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compare the memory requirement two sets of perl scripts against the
> memory requirement of doubling the total number of apache processes.
>
> My personal opinion is that the latter will be a lot more expensive in
> resou
From: "Dave Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jonathan Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: Do virtual hosts need their own servers?
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0600, Jonathan
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0600, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple instances of Apache.
> We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two separate IPs. These sites rely on
> mod_perl heavily. Each site has a unique perl script that handles just abo
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> Related to this topic, I have a question about multiple instances of Apache.
> We run two mod_perl enabled sites on two separate IPs. These sites rely on
> mod_perl heavily. Each site has a unique perl script that handles just about
> ever
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Dave Baker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > If one Apache is listening to port 80 then no others can.
> Only one instance of apache can bind to the same port *on the same IP*.
Oops. Yes of course, I should have said...
73
t: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Do virtual hosts need their own servers?
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
> >
> > > When I have multiple virtual hosts runnin
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 06:47:23PM +0100, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
>
> > When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
> > need to run their own instance of Apache?
>
> If one Apache is listening to port 80 then no ot
Hi there,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
> When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
> need to run their own instance of Apache?
If one Apache is listening to port 80 then no others can. This is why
you will get an error message when you try to start an
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
> When I have multiple virtual hosts running Apache::ASP (mod_perl), do they
> need to run their own instance of Apache?
>
> I've read through http://perl.apache.org/guide/multiuser.html and this is
> what I've gathered:
>
> 1. A hacker with access to a virt
19 matches
Mail list logo
