Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-11 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 10:36:17PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote: At 08:59 AM 6/8/2001 -0500, will trillich wrote: which of the existing paradigms will the widget farm most closely resemble? and what are your expectations for tradeoff in functionality/modularity-vs-performance? 1) What do

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-11 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, will trillich wrote: At 08:59 AM 6/8/2001 -0500, will trillich wrote: which of the existing paradigms will the widget farm most closely resemble? and what are your expectations for tradeoff in functionality/modularity-vs-performance? 1) What do you mean by your

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-10 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 08:25 PM 6/8/2001 +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: At 02:26 PM 6/7/2001 +1000, Steve Smith wrote: HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online mortgage application system I wrote has about 1,800 form fields,

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-10 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 08:59 AM 6/8/2001 -0500, will trillich wrote: On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 06:52:14PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote: At 02:26 PM 6/7/2001 +1000, Steve Smith wrote: HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-09 Thread jherring
will trillich wrote: HTML::Mason Template-Toolkit tuppence type='mine' These are only two I have much experience with. I've found both to be well written, stable and well supported. TT makes it easier to separate the logic from the presentation layer IMHO. But every time I

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-09 Thread jherring
will trillich wrote: HTML::Mason Template-Toolkit tuppence type='mine' These are only two I have much experience with. I've found both to be well written, stable and well supported. TT makes it easier to separate the logic from the presentation layer IMHO. But every time I

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-09 Thread jherring
will trillich wrote: HTML::Mason Template-Toolkit tuppence type='mine' These are only two I have much experience with. I've found both to be well written, stable and well supported. TT makes it easier to separate the logic from the presentation layer IMHO. But every time I

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-08 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 02:26 PM 6/7/2001 +1000, Steve Smith wrote: HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online mortgage application system I wrote has about 1,800 form fields, which have to be populated with data from a database. By making

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-08 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 10:49:39AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: This is your ultimate answer :) : Choosing a Templating System. http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/view/e_sess/1263 Hopefully Perrin will release his paper close to the conference. looking forward to that! thanks. --

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-08 Thread Gerald Richter
At 02:26 PM 6/7/2001 +1000, Steve Smith wrote: HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online mortgage application system I wrote has about 1,800 form fields, which have to be populated with data from a database. By

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-07 Thread Chris Strom
will trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AxKit HTML::Embperl The two that I've had the most experience with are AxKit and HTML::Embperl, and I'd recommend them both. They are both well maintained (both released updates in this week) and the mailing lists for both are very

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-07 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, will trillich wrote: warning type=religious holy war level=pandora's box okay -- there's code (mod_perl modules) and there's html, and we should keep them separate -- which gives rise to templates... i've heard of Apache::PageKit Apache::Template

comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-06 Thread will trillich
warning type=religious holy war level=pandora's box okay -- there's code (mod_perl modules) and there's html, and we should keep them separate -- which gives rise to templates... i've heard of Apache::PageKit Apache::Template AxKit eXtropia? HTML::Mason

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-06 Thread Steve Smith
HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online mortgage application system I wrote has about 1,800 form fields, which have to be populated with data from a database. By making the form fields match DB column names, I can

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-06 Thread Gerald Richter
regarding the tools that dovetail into the mod_perl paradigm, who's got a comparison over relative performance (and other strengths/weaknesses) of various templating methods? There are various discussions on the mod_perl list about this topic in the past (so take a look at the archives).

Re: comparison of templating methods?

2001-06-06 Thread T.J. Mather
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Steve Smith wrote: HTML::Embperl For me, this has one major win over the other toolkits: auto form population from a hash. The online mortgage application system I You may also fill in HTML forms with Apache::ASP and Apache::PageKit. With PageKit it automatically