Hi there
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Eric Cholet wrote:
Apache 1.3.9 (with mod_perl 1.21/perl5.005_03) doesn't let me use a
Location section in a VirtualHost section.
Really? That's quite odd. What is the error message?
Looks like I was wrong about this. Either my memory was playing
tricks on
Hi there,
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, gnielson wrote:
I am encountering some errors when trying to get an existing Apache
server to support mod_perl.
I am running Server version Apache/1.2.4 and perl, version
5.004_01. Is the fact that I have not yet ungraded to 5.004_04
giving me these
Hi - I'm another *lost* soul trying to get their Apache 1.3.9, latest mysql,
mod_perl working on Win98. I got a binary of Apache+Perl+mod_perl and it
seems to work ok - my mod_perl is working ok, my Authz module is -sort of-
working, but I'm getting hits in my apache error log from mysql.pm, a
Hi Dave,
I only do *nix, but I think that you should not need mysql.pm if you are using
DBI/DBD. Jochen is quite helpful on the MySQL modules list. subscription info availble
at www.mysql.com.
Good Luck,
Ed
At the top of the config file put:
package Config;
and refer to the vars in your page as:
[+ $Config::foo +]
On 09-Jan-00 Mike Cantrell wrote:
Quick question:
Let's say I want to keep a common configuration file which defines
variables and such. I'd like to [- Execute() -] the file but
This will be posted to both the mod_perl and mason mailing lists.
I'm tearing my hair out here. I'm using Apache::Session with Mason (snippet
of calls to Apache::Session below). For some reason, when I hit certain
pages with java applets (opencube scroller), and then do a browser "refresh"
I've got a few things to add..
I wrapped my tie in an eval so I can see what cookie is being set, etc.
It's been a big help for debugging. This has helped me to discover that the
scroller applet I'm using makes a query to a text file on the server.. so if
I have a page w/ the scroller applet
IANAL, but I understand that technologies that were in the public domain can
not be patented. And if a patent is issued, it's not enforcable in that
case. Again, IANAL, but I feel that FreeType falls in that same category
(see http://www.freetype.org).
Randy
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at
docs for the embedded language
http://shop1.virtualsellers.com/4xdoc
I had not included the original article because it came from individual.com
and you have to have an account to access it. I was able to dig up the
original
source. I am not sure how long this link will be valid for:
It turns out that the java applet making another request for a page on the
server was causing my cookie to be reset. Moving the file it was requesting
out of mason's reach fixed the problem.
With regard to yesterday's "Cryptic errors -simple Apache::Registry
script ??? (newbie)" post, I have discovered some more information. Not
that it clarifies my understanding of the error much.
By hacking (process of elimination) I have discovered that when I turn
off taint checking in my
"JW" == John Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JW I don't see where the user name is getting execed, evaled, or supplied
JW to a system call. Can anyone explain this to my pea brain?
I had one server suddenly, out of nowhere, decide to mark some things
as tainted even though they are not.
% perldoc perlsec
-- is what you are looking for. it's all there...
With regard to yesterday's "Cryptic errors -simple Apache::Registry
script ??? (newbie)" post, I have discovered some more information. Not
that it clarifies my understanding of the error much.
By hacking (process of
Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If somebody can
demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due to prior art then the
patent office will not issue the patent.
On 10-Jan-00 Randy Harmon wrote:
IANAL, but I understand that technologies that were in the public
That would be ALL of it wouldn't it? G
Anyway, I'm still not sure how the hello world script violates the use
of tainted data... it just goes to STDOUT (browser).
If I understand this correctly, I've got to run *all* my user input
through a regex and use the resultant $1, $2 parts as my data?
"JB" == Jason Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JB Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If
JB somebody can demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due
JB to prior art then the patent office will not issue the patent.
So, to all of you, what does this have to do
I think I missed the initial email but I was guessing it was sent due to the
fact that there are several embedded scripting languages that use mod_perl. If
that's why it was sent then it's very appropriate.
Perhaps you should relax. I think a grand total of 4 or 5 emails have been sent
on this
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Tim Tompkins wrote:
There is a DBD::mysql available from ActiveState. You can install it with
ppm.
ppm install DBD-mysql
Hi,
This would normally work, but the perl binary being used
most probably isn't ActiveState's, because as of yet
mod_perl doesn't work with
Vivek Khera wrote:
"JB" == Jason Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JB Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If
JB somebody can demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due
JB to prior art then the patent office will not issue the patent.
So, to all of
I brought it up. I guess I should have been more clear, but I
did it specifically for the authors of embedded perl/tag
packages such as Embperl, ASP, Mason and HTML::Template.
I intended for the authors of the packages to get "up in arms" and
send the patent office documentation on prior art so
Hi there,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Cliff Rayman wrote:
soapbox
These patents scare me since the patent granters seem not to understand
software very well - and it seems like it is diametrically opposed
to what the open software movement stands for.
/soapbox
Then come to the United Kingdom,
[cc list trimmed; this is more a mod_perl issue than a mysql one.]
Thanks a bunch for your efforts here. I understand that earlier such
bundles were built with VC6, eh? Will you have the
opportunity/ability/tuits to distribute one built with Cygwin, so that the
resultant installation can
found snippet (below) on archive, obviously i'm missing something...
after following the notes in ./mod_perl-1.3.1/INSTALL.simple.ssl,
./mod_ssl-2.4.10-1.3.9 and previous suggestions from the mailing list:
make[1]: Entering directory `/var/CPAN/build/apache_1.3.9'
=== src
I brought it up. I guess I should have been more clear, but I
did it specifically for the authors of embedded perl/tag
packages such as Embperl, ASP, Mason and HTML::Template.
I am not sure if they want to pantent embbedding a programming language in
HTML, or just their language (They later
I forgot about Micro$oft and ASP, they could squash a patent
like a bug.
I tried to look up the patent but the database is only current
through Jan 4th. I will check it out and report back when
the actual patent is available.
cliff rayman
genwax.com
Gerald Richter wrote:
> I brought it up. I
Well, I build mod_ssl/mod_perl just fine a few days ago (RH6.1). Follow
the notes at:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/install.html#mod_perl_and_mod_ssl_openssl_
The guide uses xxx for the ver numbers, so to ease on you, here is my
copy-n-paste code:
unarchive apache_1.3.9.tar.gz,
That would be ALL of it wouldn't it? G
Anyway, I'm still not sure how the hello world script violates the use
of tainted data... it just goes to STDOUT (browser).
may be because you load some other module which is not taint-clean. Look
at this in this way -- lots of people run more
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
"JB" == Jason Bodnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JB Actually, prior art prohibits something from being patented. If
JB somebody can demonstrate that the pantented concept is not new due
JB to prior art then the patent
28 matches
Mail list logo