mark warren bracher wrote:
I didn't ever actually see a post with newer numbers, so here goes..
I tested the same 50 clients/5000 requests as stas' test in the guide.
one pass with 2 uri params; another with 26. naturally I ran it all on
a server big (and quiescent) enough to handle
I didn't ever actually see a post with newer numbers, so here goes..
I tested the same 50 clients/5000 requests as stas' test in the guide.
one pass with 2 uri params; another with 26. naturally I ran it all on
a server big (and quiescent) enough to handle the 50 concurrent
requests. I
Ian Ragsdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about setting something up on SourceForge? I know they have OS X
environments available for compiling and testing.
apreq is an ASF project; IMO what we need now is a hero, not a
change of venue.
[...]
On 1/28/02 2:02 PM, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL
Heyas,
JSWould someone PLEASE volunteer to try to compile and test
JSapache+mod_perl libapreq on OS/X using the experimental
JScode I posted there? Even if you can't get it working,
JSANY feedback about what happened when you tried would be
JSVERY helpful.
Slightly off topic; I'd like to
On 2/1/02 2:21 PM, Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Ragsdale [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about setting something up on SourceForge? I know they have OS X
environments available for compiling and testing.
apreq is an ASF project; IMO what we need now is a hero, not a
change
On 2/1/02 3:39 PM, Ian Ragsdale wrote:
On the other hand, I'd be happy to compile it, but what would I need to do
to test it?
I'm in the process of trying this too (just building a mod_perl httpd in OS
X is a bit tricky...) To test it, I think all you need to do is put these
two lines in your
On 2/1/02 3:21 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Would someone PLEASE volunteer to try to compile and test
apache+mod_perl libapreq on OS/X using the experimental
code I posted there? Even if you can't get it working,
ANY feedback about what happened when you tried would be
VERY helpful.
(The below
On 1 Feb 2002, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Would someone PLEASE volunteer to try to compile and test
apache+mod_perl libapreq on OS/X using the experimental
code I posted there? Even if you can't get it working,
ANY feedback about what happened when you tried would be
VERY helpful.
OK, if
How about setting something up on SourceForge? I know they have OS X
environments available for compiling and testing.
Ian
On 1/28/02 2:19 PM, John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm cc-ing this to the Mac OS X Perl list in the hopes that someone can
provide a test environment for you.
John Siracusa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm cc-ing this to the Mac OS X Perl list in the hopes that someone can
provide a test environment for you. (I would, but my OS X box is behind a
firewall at work.)
So how about it, [EMAIL PROTECTED] folks, can any of you help get libapreq up
and
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I've run the benchmark and it wasn't the case. Did it change
recently? Or do you think that the benchmark is not fair?
we are talking about this item
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Apache_args_vs_Apache_Request
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great! Now we have an even broader benchmark. Please tell me when 1.0 is
released (in case I get carried away with other things and don't notice
the announce) and I'll make sure to update my benchmarking package,
re-run the benchmarks and correct the
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I've run the benchmark and it wasn't the case. Did it change
recently? Or do you think that the benchmark is not fair?
we are talking about this item
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Apache_args_vs_Apache_Request
Right- param() was
On 1/27/02 3:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
param() was rewritten as XS about 6-8 months ago; since then I've benchmarked
it a few times and found param() to be a bit faster than args(). We'll be
releasing a 1.0 version of libapreq as soon as Jim approves of the current CVS
version.
Did I just
Joe Schaefer wrote:
mod_perl specific examples from the guide/book ($r-args vs
Apache::Request::param, etc)
Well, I've complained about that one before, and since the
guide's text hasn't changed yet I'll try saying it again:
Apache::Request::param() is FASTER THAN Apache::args(),
15 matches
Mail list logo
