Longer response here.
So I'm happy to be another active PMC member still involved. As
someone with a growing family, my time is limited, but not too much to
review and lend a +1 or feedback. I think that may be the case for a
few of the folks on this list. I'd like to see Steve Hay lead the
I didn't say there are no developers, I said there is no active
development happening. Steve Hay is a developer. Fred Moyer, who replied
to this thread earlier this evening, has also made significant
contributions to the project. I can dive into the C if I have to, to fix
bugs or review code,
Given the recent discussion on the need for mod_perl PMC members and the
disclosure that there is no active development on mod_perl this seems
like an appropriate time to start a thread on a discussion of mod_perl
alternatives inline with the various means of using mod_perl from the
low level
Sure... I'll start a new thread after I reply here.
I don't know about how apache projects are maintained and the logistics,
but there are two issues here.
Foremost... from your previous response you need a few people to step up
and file your described report indicating no new releases, but
Happy to continue being a maintainer. Longer response coming soon :)
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 7:39 PM Adam Prime wrote:
> I think if you want to discuss alternatives, then a new thread would be
> the place to do that.
>
> With regards to plug being pulled, I think that it is up to the
> community
I think if you want to discuss alternatives, then a new thread would be
the place to do that.
With regards to plug being pulled, I think that it is up to the
community if, when, and how that happens. That's what the point of this
thread is. If there aren't people that are committed enough to
Not that I want to be the guy that says it sounds like we'll be pulling
the mod_perl plug at any time the right scenario arises, but is it
reasonable to have a discussion here on mod_perl alternatives inline
with the various means of using mod_perl from the low level means of
interfacing with
The projects current state is that no new development happening. This
isn't to say that new development shouldn't happen, but it isn't. Apache
and Perl both continue to move forward, and we are pretty lucky that the
design that Stas, Phillipe, Geoff, etc built mod_perl 2 under is
resilient
When the roll call was done a month ago it's basically myself and Steve,
with Steve really being the only one that has much knowledge of the guts
of the project. Up until the last few months gozer (Phillippe Chaisson)
was at least around enough to file reports, but has been MIA a few
months.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 19:40, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> Dear community members,
>
> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity reduces
> to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache,
> projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3
I am not interested in performing those duties but could you clarify how many
active PMC members there are currently? It looks like the list at
https://perl.apache.org/about/pmc.html is over 7 years out of date. It’s
unclear how up-to-date the list at
On Mar 17, 2021, at 3:40 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
> If you are interested in seeing mod_perl remain an active project, and are
> able to help maintain and provide oversight, please respond in this thread
> indicating that you are interested in performing the duties of a PMC
> member[2].
I
Dear community members,
As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity
reduces to a level such that the project is no longer sustainable. At
Apache, projects reach this stage when there are not at least 3 active PMC
members providing oversight. Projects that reach this
13 matches
Mail list logo
