Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-04-10 Thread E R
Hi all, On x86_64 I noticed that perl .so files (XS modules) appear to use a lot more memory than they do on 32-bit architectures. In particular, /proc/$$/smaps reports a ~ 2MB segment associated with the .so library that is not reported in the 32-bit case. For more details, see my posting to the

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-04-11 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 11 Apr 2011, at 02:24, E R wrote: > Hi all, > > On x86_64 I noticed that perl .so files (XS modules) appear to use a > lot more memory than they do on 32-bit architectures. It's not just .so files. The footprint of our whole mod_perl processes pretty much doubled when we went to 64 bit (incl

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-04-11 Thread E R
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: > Are you using the A::S that's in the repo? It has fixes for calculating > sizes... Using RSS-SHARED instead of VSIZE-SHARED should fix the x86_64 issue I'm seeing. But I've got some questions about Apache2::SizeLimit... 1. Are the docs a

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-04-18 Thread Fred Moyer
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, E R wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote: >> Are you using the A::S that's in the repo? It has fixes for calculating >> sizes... > > Using RSS-SHARED instead of VSIZE-SHARED should fix the x86_64 issue I'm > seeing. > > But I've got som

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > On 04/18/11 23:34, Fred Moyer wrote: >> >> Can you try the release candidate?  A couple of users were clamoring >> for it but then they went quiet, so maybe it is working so well they >> forgot to write back. > >        Hey Fred. I tota

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-12 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:15:57 +1000, Fred Moyer wrote: There has not been any feedback on the release candidate from this thread, and as such there is no projected release date. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/102778 There seems to be a few users who really want this releas

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-12 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 10:22:32 +1000, Cosimo Streppone wrote: So, I have a few questions: 1) What is the proper way to test Apache2::SizeLimit in a dev environment and in a production (say Debian) environment? 2) Is there an svn repository that I can use to write a pod/README/INSTALL

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-12 Thread Fred Moyer
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:15:57 +1000, Fred Moyer > wrote: > >> There has not been any feedback on the release candidate from this >> thread, and as such there is no projected release date. >> >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:08:13 +1000, Fred Moyer wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Cosimo Streppone wrote: On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:15:57 +1000, Fred Moyer wrote: There has not been any feedback on the release candidate from this thread, and as such there is no projected release date.

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:10:02 +1000, Fred Moyer wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Cosimo Streppone wrote: 3) Does Apache2::SizeLimit 0.96 require the newer Apache2::MM that comes with mod_perl 2.0.5 then? If it is needed, we can add it as a prerequisite. We can do a few RC iter

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Fred Moyer
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:08:13 +1000, Fred Moyer > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Cosimo Streppone >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 13 May 2011 09:15:57 +1000, Fred Moyer >>> wrote: >>> There has not been any feedback on the

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Fred Moyer
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Cosimo Streppone wrote: > On Fri, 13 May 2011 16:10:02 +1000, Fred Moyer > wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Cosimo Streppone >> wrote: > >>> 3) Does Apache2::SizeLimit 0.96 require the newer Apache2::MM >>>  that comes with mod_perl 2.0.5 then? >> >>

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Friday, May 13, 2011 09:48:56 Fred Moyer wrote: > > It looks like it does, because testing w/ mp 2.0.4 I got > > (from my earlier message): > > > > APACHE_TEST_APXS=/usr/bin/apxs2 perl -Iblib/lib > > t/response/TestApache2/basic.pm > > Can't locate object method "is_threaded" via package "Apa

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 18:41:43 +1000, Torsten Förtsch wrote: On Friday, May 13, 2011 09:48:56 Fred Moyer wrote: > It looks like it does, because testing w/ mp 2.0.4 I got > (from my earlier message): > > APACHE_TEST_APXS=/usr/bin/apxs2 perl -Iblib/lib > t/response/TestApache2/basic.pm > Can'

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Friday, May 13, 2011 10:51:51 Cosimo Streppone wrote: > The problem from my pov is that with mp 2.0.4 these tests > are completely skipped (t/apache, t/apache2, etc...). > I was just trying to fiddle around to understand why > that was the case. Just a guess, do you use a modern A::T with 2.0.4

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-05-13 Thread Cosimo Streppone
On Fri, 13 May 2011 19:23:12 +1000, Torsten Förtsch wrote: On Friday, May 13, 2011 10:51:51 Cosimo Streppone wrote: The problem from my pov is that with mp 2.0.4 these tests are completely skipped (t/apache, t/apache2, etc...). I was just trying to fiddle around to understand why that was th

Re: Apache2::SizeLimit and x64_86

2011-07-15 Thread Max Kanat-Alexander
On 05/12/11 16:15, Fred Moyer wrote: There has not been any feedback on the release candidate from this thread, and as such there is no projected release date. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/102778 Hey Fred & list. I just tested this release and it works perfectly and does