I'm not sure how many of you are aware of chromatic's previous article
about "5 things perl 5 needs right now", or about the mod_perlite
project that was spawned by some people from sixapart, but chromatic has
published another article that's basically a conversation with Byrne
Reese and Aaron Ston
Adam,
Thank you so much for posting this to the list. The project needs the
help of some of the Perl and Apache Module gurus I hope frequent this
list. Aaron posted the source to github, but last I heard github had
somehow managed to corrupt the source. So, Aaron should now be working
on
Hi,
first thank you for mod_perlite and the background informations on it.
Some days ago we discussed in #perlde (and perhaps will continue to
discuss it on the German Perl Wokshop), that beside the ugly slow CGI
performance there is one more major problem with Perl for mainstream web
applica
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Adam Prime wrote:
> I'm not sure how many of you are aware of chromatic's previous article
> about "5 things perl 5 needs right now", or about the mod_perlite
> project that was spawned by some people from sixapart, but chromatic has
> published another article tha
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Adam Prime wrote:
I'm not sure how many of you are aware of chromatic's previous article
about "5 things perl 5 needs right now", or about the mod_perlite
project that was spawned by some people from sixapart, but chromatic has
published an
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Adam Prime wrote:
> In the context of people with uber-cheap virtual webhosting, is changing
> MaxRequestsPerChild really an option?
No, but frankly, uber-cheap virtual hosting will never support
mod_perl or mod_perlite.
> FastCGI, to me anyway, has a big barrier
Perrin Harkins schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Adam Prime
wrote:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/cgi-is-dead-mod-perlite-is-ali.html
We discussed this on PerlMonks. Here's my take on it:
http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=738192
To quote:
| To get the environment they're trying
IMO the profile below does not indicate that the sky
is falling.
A survey of "how long have you been using computers?"
might show a similar distribution.
craig
www.animalhead.com
On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Adam Prime wrote:
How long have you been using mod_perl?
Just started
macke...@animalhead.com wrote:
IMO the profile below does not indicate that the sky
is falling.
A survey of "how long have you been using computers?"
might show a similar distribution.
Just because it might have the same distribution doesn't mean it's relevant. I bet a question like
"How long
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> I think this is technically incorrect in that it does not match the
> Apache/LibPHP execution model (which is what I think they're trying to
> emulate), where the Apache/LibPHP process does not exit after serving
> only a single request.
We
Perrin Harkins schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Michael Ludwig
wrote:
I think this is technically incorrect in that it does not match the
Apache/LibPHP execution model (which is what I think they're trying
to emulate), where the Apache/LibPHP process does not exit after
serving only a
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Michael Ludwig wrote:
> I may be wrong but I used to think that PerlRun provides just that, a
> non-persistent execution environment, just like LibPHP. Memory consumed
> by the interpreter is not deallocated in either case. (Unless, of
> course, I'm wrong.)
It's n
Perrin Harkins schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Michael Ludwig
wrote:
I may be wrong but I used to think that PerlRun provides just that, a
non-persistent execution environment, just like LibPHP.
It's not really possible in perl. PerlRun attempts to fake it by
removing anything add
13 matches
Mail list logo
