While it is certainly entertaining to observe the bickerings of your two, on
here, allow me a suggestion that will actually benefit those who need to use
these tools, and are more interested in performance than politics:
I am going to set up two identical boxes, and install either of your two
sol
On Wed, May 05, 1999, Harry Zink wrote:
> While it is certainly entertaining to observe the bickerings of your two, on
> here, allow me a suggestion that will actually benefit those who need to use
> these tools, and are more interested in performance than politics:
>
> I am going to set up two
> Fine. Although from a performance point of view you'll not see much
> differences, of course. It's more the functionality you've to compare IMHO.
> For this an overview chart is useful...
Understood, and I will compare functionality, as well as ease of use, and
ease of install.
After all, some
On Thu, May 06, 1999, Harry Zink wrote:
> > Fine. Although from a performance point of view you'll not see much
> > differences, of course. It's more the functionality you've to compare IMHO.
> > For this an overview chart is useful...
>
> Understood, and I will compare functionality, as well as
Just a note from one of the teeming millions.
The current situation is rather confusing. Like many I had originally
thought ApacheSSL & mod_ssl were the same thing. I'm also one of those who
had initial difficulties installing ApacheSSL, so I tried out mod_ssl.
Ralf's extensive website and the p
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
>
> > > RPMs? No, please compile from scratch and both packages the same way, of
> > > course.
> >
> > The RPM issue came from the 'ease of installation' standpoint - no problem,
> > I'll do the compile then for both.
>
> Ok, for me "ease of installation" is a pure f
Harry Zink wrote:
>
> > I'm just saying that there is a definite need for some third-party
> > point-by-point comparison.
>
> Considering that at this point not only have many mod_SSL users provided
> suggestions and support for this benchmark project, but Ralph was one of the
> first to jump in
> I'm just saying that there is a definite need for some third-party
> point-by-point comparison.
Considering that at this point not only have many mod_SSL users provided
suggestions and support for this benchmark project, but Ralph was one of the
first to jump in with suggestions and help, I'm v
> Since you are having the discussion on a mod_ssl support list, I find
> this unsurprising.
Not entirely, since I posted mine in the thread that you and Ralph were
'going at it'. While amusing and entertaining, I did not find it contributed
much to the general understanding of the differences be
