UR> I'd like to find out what is different in your build from mine. When I
UR> fetched the port from FreeBSD.org, the very first time make is run, some
UR> script prompted me for which databases I'd like use.
RS> "the very first time make is run", "some script prompted me"... Huh. Are
you
RS> s
On Wed, Mar 03, 1999, Juergen Rensen wrote:
> I had only one little problem installing apache 1.3.4, SSLeay0.9.0b, php3
> 3.0.7, mod_ssl 1.3.4 and postqresql, that was, 'palloc' was defined in some
> postqresql 6.3 header file that was itself included into some php3 C file
> that also included a
Tuesday, March 02, 1999 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Eric Gus
Subject: Re: config, compile, install help - php3, ssl, apache 1.3.x
>Would it be easier to wipe my source dir and restart from scratch or can I
>simply add-in php3?
Been there, done that - still
> 2-Mar-99 10:28 you wrote:
> > A note about php. If you choose to integrate database access for example to
> > mysql in the php install, then mysqld must be running for apache to start.
> > This is not very nice and means you must insure that upon a restart or cold
> > start that the database da
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User Rick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> 2-Mar-99 10:28 you wrote:
>> > A note about php. If you choose to integrate database access for example to
>> > mysql in the php install, then mysqld must be running for apache to start.
>> > This is not very nice and means you must i
2-Mar-99 10:28 you wrote:
> A note about php. If you choose to integrate database access for example to
> mysql in the php install, then mysqld must be running for apache to start.
> This is not very nice and means you must insure that upon a restart or cold
> start that the database daemon is up
2-Mar-99 06:14 you wrote:
>>This seems like a popular combination, perhaps it would be worth someone
>>doing up an rpm combining these particular modules (but might be a lot of work
>>keeping a package with all the latest versions after each upgrade).
> That sounds like it'd be a nightmare for wh
>This seems like a popular combination, perhaps it would be worth someone
>doing up an rpm combining these particular modules (but might be a lot of work
>keeping a package with all the latest versions after each upgrade).
That sounds like it'd be a nightmare for whoever would be kind enough to
>At least when you compile from source you should be able to use mod_perl,
>mod_php and whatever else with Apache+mod_ssl without problems.
Thanks... I'll attempt that next.
Harry
__
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl) www.en
On Mon, Mar 01, 1999, Harry Zink wrote:
> I installed the apapche 1.3.4+mod_SSL rpm that is floating around on
> Ralph's site - it works wonderfuly by itself, but it appears that no
> other redhat modules can be installed on top of that installation. This
> appears to be due to apache+mod_ssl
> > I installed the apapche 1.3.4+mod_SSL rpm that is floating around on
> > Ralph's site - it works wonderfuly by itself, but it appears that no
> > other redhat modules can be installed on top of that installation. This
> > appears to be due to apache+mod_ssl is using some EAPI, which is not
>
Harry Zink wrote:
>
> >Would it be easier to wipe my source dir and restart from scratch or can I
> >simply add-in php3?
>
> Been there, done that - still can't get it to work myself.
>
> I installed the apapche 1.3.4+mod_SSL rpm that is floating around on
> Ralph's site - it works wonderfuly b
There is a FreeBSD port of apache 1.3.4 + php + mod_ssl which I've hacked to
include mod_frontpage. I did not include mod_perl. I spent a bit of time
building each apache 1.3.4 with each mod_ separately to observe which pieces
are patched and why. I reccommend this approach if you are going
13 matches
Mail list logo