What is MT funding?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Barghini, Gina gina.bargh...@bsd7.orgwrote:
I would be really interested in hearing how your schedule works seeing so
many children and providing 1:1 reading recovery services. I am also trained
and also received small literacy training in
Hi Bev! There are a lot of reasons why I didn't like RR. One reason, maybe
it wasn't my time to do it. I missed too many things in the classroom. It
got really boring for me reading with only one child. I missed the whole class
lessons in reading and writing workshop. I love teaching
I didn't say it was a waste of money. I said it was an expensive program. I
did work with first graders who made great gains, but after they finished the
program gains were made at a much slower pace (of course, no more one on
one). I am glad for the training because I am a much better
I am in a district that has provided training and support for 2 Reading
Recovery teachers - now starting the 11th year. I was hesitant to start the
program (I was the only Title 1 reading support person at the time), because
I, too thought 1 on 1 didn't sound very efficient. I also was under the
Barghini, Gina wrote:
I would be really interested in hearing how your schedule works seeing so many
children and providing 1:1 reading recovery services. I am also trained and
also received small literacy training in Arkansas. I just returned from a RTI
training and the presenter was not
Kathy--please tell me how to get ahold of the Choice Literacy newsletter.
Thanks, all, for all of the ideas. Please keep them coming.
From: Kathryn Smigen smig...@guilderlandschools.org
To: mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009
I see 4 RR students. I also have 2 early literacy groups (1 with 6
students, 1 with 4 students) . I see a 2nd grader as part of RtI (sort
of?). I am in the process of testing kdg. and will begin with a group of 4
kdg's. soon.
Last year I had 4 RR students (each round), 1 student (RtI) who
RR was discontiued in our district due to the poor results. The amount
of students that were served was very small in comparison to the $$
output. After studying all the district student data, it was found that
most students that had been discontinued from the program with on
level scores
