At 23:37 19/12/2000 -0800, T Lee wrote:
>Anyone know why I can't go to https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
>using Beonex 0.6-pre ? TIA
It's fine here, you need to go to the Beonex support group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon
>T Lee
>
>
Anyone know why I can't go to https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
using Beonex 0.6-pre ? TIA
T Lee
I'm sure... If my competitors get a hold of this letter,
I might as well move out of the country!
Let me explain.
I'm in the business of setting people up to do
business on the Internet. As you probably know, there's only
a few things that you actually need to accomplish this
1. Something t
put a shortcut to netscape in yoru STart UP menu
Go to netscape's Program file
right click on it, create shortcut
drag shortcut to the desktop
then drag shortcut to your start up menu under teh sTART button.
easy no?
"Loic Carpier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:
Azrael wrote:
>
> Daniel Veditz wrote:
>
> > Jesse Ruderman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> Mac
> >
> >>> doesn't like the missing menu at all, that's bug 50877.
> >
> >>
> >> At least one Windows user doesn't like them missing, either. Is there a bug
> >
> >> to bring them back on all platforms? There'
Daniel Veditz wrote:
> Jesse Ruderman wrote:
>
>
>>> Mac
>
>>> doesn't like the missing menu at all, that's bug 50877.
>
>>
>> At least one Windows user doesn't like them missing, either. Is there a bug
>
>> to bring them back on all platforms? There's bug 32719, but that's been
>
>> mar
Internet Investigator
All NEW for 2001!Internet Software Program for
Investigating
Find Anything and Anyone
Online
Become an "Internet Investigator" and explore a whole
new
world of valuable information.
Uncover Information
about:, neighbors, enemies, deb
Hello!
When will be published new roadmap?
I see in bugzilla new nsbeta1 status and some words about NS6.5... Can
anyone explane?
--
Best regards, Eugene Savitsky.
Menelon OU E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.menelon.ee
In article <1103_977257029@rmg-athlon1>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Hi, I am not sure if this is the right place to ask or not,
Actually, it isn't. You need to repost in either one of the
netscape.public.beta.feedback.* or netscape.netscape6.* groups. The
netscape.public.mozilla.* groups ar
Hi, I am not sure if this is the right place to ask or not, but here goes. I installed
NS 6 on this machine, and as time went on it crashed more and more frequently.
One day I emptied the cache and the next time I tried to launch it more crashes.
Now it won't even load any page before crasheing. I
Hi, I am not sure if this is the right place to ask or not, but here goes. I installed
NS 6 on this machine, and as time went on it crashed more and more frequently.
One day I emptied the cache and the next time I tried to launch it more crashes.
Now it won't even load any page before crasheing.
Hello!
>> My question is: Why does N6 open "2" windows when I click on an
>> http://.htm link within Outlook 2000. I have N6 setup as my default
>> browser and it does open only "1" window when a saved htm or html page
>> is clicked on, but when I click a link in a "Email" message it opens
My smtp server need authenticating to non-local recipient.
How configure this in mozilla?
Thanks
Can someone point to me in the right direction with a small hack ?
I'd like to implement a feature that cURL has where a form field
references data in file, by prefixing the file name in the text box with @.
-Rob
corey wrote:
>
> For a few days now, I've been downloading the newest nightlies onto my
> iBook. It installs fine, however, everytime I try to run it, it asks me
> to confirm profile migration. This occurs regardless of whether I import
> profile, create a profile anew, etc. It's as if Mozilla
I didn't see this in known issues for 0.6, but perhaps someone could
enlighten me...
For a few days now, I've been downloading the newest nightlies onto my
iBook. It installs fine, however, everytime I try to run it, it asks me
to confirm profile migration. This occurs regardless of whether I im
At 14:01 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>At 11:12 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
>>
>>>"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
>>>
>>> > This is slightly better than just using a password in Mozilla, but
>>> suffers
>>> > the same drawback.
>>>My point EXACTLY (the SAM
Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> Kent Perrier wrote:
>
>
>> I have finally upgraded from NS4.7X to Mozilla and I have gotten everything
>> working except the Java 1.3.0_01 plug-in. I have installed it from the the
>> SDK and I have installed it from the Netscape plugin finder page. In both
>> cases, th
Hi Mozilla-Team!
Is it possible, that you create a project, which creates a non-Java-like
free Virtual-Machine?
I think that the Operating Systems itself are in the future more and
more unimportant. The desktop is the important thing. Look at your
Mozilla and OpenOffice: Both creating programs f
$BFMA3$N%a!<%k$G<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#$3$N%a!<%k$O!"%5%$%I%S%8%M%9$dI{6H$K(B
$B$44X?4$N$"$k3'MM$K$*Aw$j$7$F$$$^$9!#3'MM$NL4$NpJs!*(B2001$BG/#17n#1F|@5<0%9%?!<%H!*!*!!(B
$B$3$NAa4|EPO?$G!"%]%8%7%g%s3NJ]!">R2pR2pR2p$K<+?.$N$J$$J}$G$bK~B-$N=PMh$k<}F~$rF@$F$$$?$@$1$k$h(B
$B$&$K!"F~2q=g$K<+F09=C[
At 11:12 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
>"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
>
> > At 09:58 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
> > >OK, most people use Win9x. If one were to set up multiple user profiles in
> > >Win9x, would:
> > >
> > >a) Mozilla install its user files to that users directory?
> >
> >
Stuart, you are my hero ;-)
Stuart Ballard wrote:
> "Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
> >
> > >It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best possible cost
> > >versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
> > >management". Anyhow, the password would be far from n
Why are you assuming that most users are in a corporate network environment
("assuming the admin knows what they're doing")? Also, suggesting PGP as a solution
completely misses the reality of most users not being able to install/configure
this complex software (I am an "advanced" user and unistal
"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
> At 09:58 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
> >OK, most people use Win9x. If one were to set up multiple user profiles in
> >Win9x, would:
> >
> >a) Mozilla install its user files to that users directory?
>
> It should do, if it doesn't that's a bug.
>
> >b) would that
At 09:58 19/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
>OK, most people use Win9x. If one were to set up multiple user profiles in
>Win9x,
>would:
>
>a) Mozilla install its user files to that users directory?
It should do, if it doesn't that's a bug.
>b) would that directory be in any way protected fro
At 13:44 18/12/2000 -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
>"Simon P. Lucy" wrote:
> >
> > >It is an optimal solution if you define optimal to be the best
> possible cost
> > >versus benefit. Most users use win9x which has virtually NO "Permission
> > >management". Anyhow, the password would be far from no
OK, most people use Win9x. If one were to set up multiple user profiles in Win9x,
would:
a) Mozilla install its user files to that users directory?
b) would that directory be in any way protected from view by persons logging in
under another Win9x profile?
If either answer is NO, then Mozilla s
At 18:47 18/12/2000 +0100, Peter Lairo wrote:
>you guys just don't get it. Nobody is asking for some all inclusive security
>system. What is merely requested is a simple and convenient way to "hinder"
>casual,
I don't think anyone is under the misapprehension that you're suggesting
all inclusive
hello,
I have a problem with a page which is very long to display.
This contains a lot of TABLE. 20 or 30
Is it normal ? Is it a knowed bug ?
I would like to know from how many TABLE it's a bug...
thank you
Loic
29 matches
Mail list logo
